31 Aug 2015 23:22:16
what do people think of the eu?
should we remain part of it or leave asap?
01 Sep 2015 15:59:18
It's too late to leave, it has a grip on the UK and it's not letting go.
EU is bad for Britain and its people.
It's too late to leave, it has a grip on the UK and it's not letting go.
EU is bad for Britain and its people.
{Ed033's Note - The Eu has zero legitimacy as the only people who voted for it was the people of Eire and that was after the second time of voting. The Eu is banking on the idea that as long as it can stay around long enough, it will infest so much that you have to keep it at any cost. Not only that, people will think it legitimate the longer it stays around.
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
02 Sep 2015 11:34:23
The ECSC which laid the foundations for the EU was formed in 1951. Between then and now is a time period less than the average life span. There are examples of people having been under occupation for much larger time periods and that never stopped them from reclaiming control of their lives and future.
As Ed033 pointed out the EU is an imposed establishment. As such it is destined to fail. For that to happen though people need to be able to envision an alternative and before that, they must first be in a position to perceive what the EU is, how it affects peoples lives and what its aims are.
An argument as to why the EU should cease to exist.
Currently every continent has its own union, some more than one. They are the precursor to global governance. They are gradual implementations of regional federations which aim to revoke the ability of local societies to decide their future.
A parallel to this can be observed in the ongoing trend of de-emphasizing the need for self control and the concurrent gradual imposition of a set of externally decided guidelines that are aimed towards controlling people. In other words the legal establishment.
By employing the fallacies of authority and expertise self-anointed rulers seek to purge personal choice from the spectrum of possibility and replace it with unquestionable obedience and pseudo-choice, reaction to external stimuli through total control of environmental parameters.
The consequences of this are serious and require attention.
By removing personal choice one removes variability among our species and thus diversity. Diversity is a natural law existing because it eliminates the possibility of absolute system failure. When one organism, in the case of our species an idea, fails another replaces it. Thereby continuing the process of evolution without the need for alternating cycles of construction-destruction.
The reason for this is that said cycles require the expenditure of unfathomable amounts of energy to perhaps no benefit to the all. Efficiency is paramount as it influences when relative infinity is achieved. As an example, a watermelon can feed a nest of ants for a few months but that same watermelon can feed a human for a couple of days. By increasing efficiency we reduce the amount of required energy thus enabling us to achieve perpetuity easier.
Physics and mathematics set clear rules in natural laws as to how one should function both in regards to the self and on every scale between unit and all. Limit is called the natural logarithm for a reason, it exists to indicate the path towards perpetuity, infinity.
The ECSC which laid the foundations for the EU was formed in 1951. Between then and now is a time period less than the average life span. There are examples of people having been under occupation for much larger time periods and that never stopped them from reclaiming control of their lives and future.
As Ed033 pointed out the EU is an imposed establishment. As such it is destined to fail. For that to happen though people need to be able to envision an alternative and before that, they must first be in a position to perceive what the EU is, how it affects peoples lives and what its aims are.
An argument as to why the EU should cease to exist.
Currently every continent has its own union, some more than one. They are the precursor to global governance. They are gradual implementations of regional federations which aim to revoke the ability of local societies to decide their future.
A parallel to this can be observed in the ongoing trend of de-emphasizing the need for self control and the concurrent gradual imposition of a set of externally decided guidelines that are aimed towards controlling people. In other words the legal establishment.
By employing the fallacies of authority and expertise self-anointed rulers seek to purge personal choice from the spectrum of possibility and replace it with unquestionable obedience and pseudo-choice, reaction to external stimuli through total control of environmental parameters.
The consequences of this are serious and require attention.
By removing personal choice one removes variability among our species and thus diversity. Diversity is a natural law existing because it eliminates the possibility of absolute system failure. When one organism, in the case of our species an idea, fails another replaces it. Thereby continuing the process of evolution without the need for alternating cycles of construction-destruction.
The reason for this is that said cycles require the expenditure of unfathomable amounts of energy to perhaps no benefit to the all. Efficiency is paramount as it influences when relative infinity is achieved. As an example, a watermelon can feed a nest of ants for a few months but that same watermelon can feed a human for a couple of days. By increasing efficiency we reduce the amount of required energy thus enabling us to achieve perpetuity easier.
Physics and mathematics set clear rules in natural laws as to how one should function both in regards to the self and on every scale between unit and all. Limit is called the natural logarithm for a reason, it exists to indicate the path towards perpetuity, infinity.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0