09 May 2012 13:21:34
Hi guys, I don't really post on here much but I read a lot of the stuff that's on here. anyway, it was my brother in-laws birthday bash Yesterday and both his side of the family and mine (my sisters) side of the family.
It worked out that I was sitting next to his Dad and having a good chat with him, I've met him once or twice before this and I knew he was a retired doctor. Although what I found out is that he specialized in Brain activity.
We must have been chatting for 2 or 3 hours about everything, football, rugby, etc. and then we started talking about his work, which made me think of the Pineal gland theories running round on here and I thought I tell you a little about what he told me about the brain and his understanding of Pineal Gland;
- Fluoride doesn't affect the Pineal Gland as such, yes it harms us but at the same rate that Mobile Phones do. It's not good for us but the damage is so minimal that it doesn't have a lasting affect on us.
- When somebody dies or loses brain activity the Pineal Gland doesn't shut down for around 3-4 Minutes after the person is deemed dead.
- Since in the introduction of Fluoride into Drinking water and toothpaste (as well as a LOT of other products) the number of children born with brain damage has increased severely.
those are the things that he's been taught over the years, but personally he believes that there is a 'conspiracy' so to speak but he believes it increases the years that we live and if we were to have them unblocked the population would dramatically increase and the worlds food resources would decline even further. he's got no evidence to support it but it's a belief that is apparently popular in the medical profession.
Oh, and he did mention something about the pineal gland being ignored a lot. when he was studying with brain activity he hardly ever came across matters involving it.
Just thought I would share that with you :). and for those of you wanting to know he retired in 2004.
The Moon.
frankyscouse
His other theory which he was still a little undecided on was that it would dramatically increase growth.
The Moon.
frankyscouse
Have a good day mate.
The Moon.
{Ed033's Note - It says, "It worked out that I was sitting next to his Dad"
Further, as far as I'm aware, the pineal gland is largely neglected in neuroscience because it does not appear to have a more profound function than controlling our circadian rhythm. Not since the days of Decartes has the pineal gland seriously been considered as the "seat of the soul" (or anything equally metaphysical).
Rikki {Ed001's Note - if you can't understand that the average life expectancy of humanity has increased because of the decrease in malnutrition throughout the western world, then I fear for you. Certainly nothing to do with flouride and there is no way of knowing if it is holding the life expectancy down or not. In fact the life expectancy in a number of countries has not increased, as you suggest, in line with flouride intake. You are also failing to take into account that life expectancies in the past were affected by things such as wars, flu epidemics etc. Then there is the fact that the main thing which affects life expectancy is child mortality. Child mortality has massively decreased which has improved life expectancy hugely. Not really difficult to understand for someone who claims to be so smart is it Rikki? Certainly nothing to support your line in the figures.}
In not a single post have I claimed to be "so smart", I merely express my opinion on some topics that interest me. I'm sorry such behaviour elicits personal jibes, Ed! {Ed001's Note - except that you have in no way shown anything to suggest you even have the slightest clue what you are talking about. You are talking about life expectancy, which is absolutely irrelevant, as I have shown. Life span is the measure you would need to judge by, which has not increased at all, unlike your attempts to suggest otherwise. You were basing your cynicism on complete nonsense, using irrelevant and misleading stats to try and make a point. There will never be a way to prove whether a chemical really does shorten lifespan, after all how do we really know for sure someone's lifespan? What we can be sure of, is that filling our bodies with toxic chemicals, such as flouride, is not healthy or good for it.}