15 Feb 2020 13:34:07
This is the 'Starman' live stream footage from SpaceX.
Now, I haven't been sad enough to sit through all of the, more than 4 hours, of footage. But I am sure if I did I would be able to spot other proofs of fakery. I just stumbled across this by chance.
At the 3hr59m36sec mark, the screen goes black for several seconds. I am not sure why this is.
At 4hr00m11secs 'Starman' reappears and if you watch from 4hrs00m26secs you will start to see bubbles rising from the car just behind 'Starman's' head.
{Ed033's Note - This couldn't work even if there was an outer space because of the temperatures and vacuum pressures of the alleged outer space?
15 Feb 2020 16:47:14
You would expect the tyres (amongst other things) to blow up from the vacuum, but I don't know if that's before or after the whole car turns in to a fireball from the 250C temperature we are told things in space are, when in the Suns light.
But which bit of MSBS do you want to choose as the truth? (probably none of it haha) . Michelle Thaller say's "The air around the Earth is millions of degrees hot, and that's fact. ". So, I am not quite sure how Elon got past that small problem.
You would expect the tyres (amongst other things) to blow up from the vacuum, but I don't know if that's before or after the whole car turns in to a fireball from the 250C temperature we are told things in space are, when in the Suns light.
But which bit of MSBS do you want to choose as the truth? (probably none of it haha) . Michelle Thaller say's "The air around the Earth is millions of degrees hot, and that's fact. ". So, I am not quite sure how Elon got past that small problem.
{Ed033's Note - We're trying to find the real truth.
Is the truth that they have to fake outer space because there is no outer space?
Is there a certain number of miles up then there is the Firmament?
Is the truth that they have to fake outer space because there is no outer space?
Is there a certain number of miles up then there is the Firmament?
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
15 Feb 2020 18:30:21
I don't really know, but I am open to the possibility that we are in an enclosed system of sorts. Quite how it all works, again, I don't know.
I do see the remnants of ancient trees everywhere I look, now. So the 'waters above the Firmament' could be an answer. I have seen a lot of things that would suggest this.
There is also the possibility we are in an enclosed 'Matrix/ Tron' style system and beyond low Earth orbit just hasn't been coded into the program.
I don't really know, but I am open to the possibility that we are in an enclosed system of sorts. Quite how it all works, again, I don't know.
I do see the remnants of ancient trees everywhere I look, now. So the 'waters above the Firmament' could be an answer. I have seen a lot of things that would suggest this.
There is also the possibility we are in an enclosed 'Matrix/ Tron' style system and beyond low Earth orbit just hasn't been coded into the program.
{Ed033's Note - yes, most everywhere i look outside is what's left of petrified giant trees.
Be interesting to look at old coins to see what date the prefix I (meaning after Christ) was changed to 1. i.e. when the 1000 years was added to coins. Is it the same year for all coins worldwide?
Be interesting to look at old coins to see what date the prefix I (meaning after Christ) was changed to 1. i.e. when the 1000 years was added to coins. Is it the same year for all coins worldwide?
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
15 Feb 2020 22:53:23
I brought a A. Fomenko book, and I am struggling TBH. Not read that much but it would be beyond what I have, to try and pick apart his works to know the truth.
So on that basis, in my mind, a waste of time? . Or I just take it as so? . The fact most if not all of his studies are based around the Russian empire's history make's me want to step away.
There are TOO many things I have seen, that says that, the mainstream narrative is bull. This makes everything else have more sparkle, and I have to be mindful over what I 'See' as so.
I brought a A. Fomenko book, and I am struggling TBH. Not read that much but it would be beyond what I have, to try and pick apart his works to know the truth.
So on that basis, in my mind, a waste of time? . Or I just take it as so? . The fact most if not all of his studies are based around the Russian empire's history make's me want to step away.
There are TOO many things I have seen, that says that, the mainstream narrative is bull. This makes everything else have more sparkle, and I have to be mindful over what I 'See' as so.
{Ed033's Note - You probably know this, but there are a series of videos (around 13 of them) based on some of the data in the A. Fomenko books. There are a few on youtube, but only one is in English that i can find, which shows that when the Bible (Book of Nehemiah) is talking about the restoration of Jerusalem, it actually is talking about the building of the Kremlin in the 16th Century. I posted it on here before on here, but if you haven't seen it:
History: Fiction or Science? Part 11. - The Moscow Kremlin
History: Fiction or Science? Part 11. - The Moscow Kremlin
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0