08 Mar 2015 20:56:28
Was reading on the net the other day about the court case of the 'Boston bomber'. They are saying he has now admitted he is guilty of the charges levelled at him. Now, I watched a few videos at the time it happened and it seemed quite dodgy to me, something didn't sit right or add up. Anybody who watched the vids would remember the man who's leg(s) were blown off in the blast (possibly named Jeff Beauman, not sure off memory) and experts claimed he wouldn't have survived to tell the tale. He was giving evidence at court. I'm going to take a more detailed look at the case when time permits, was just wondering what you all thought of the updated proceedings. Is it all another smokescreen or was I wrong in originally believing Boston was a false flag of some description?
This all ties in with Chris Kyle, the sniper the USA are trying to paint as some type of hero. Am I right in thinking he owned the company that was used as security that day? It's been a while since I watched anything on these subjects
