06 Feb 2021 17:32:12
Sorry Ed033 can\'t find the vid I saw or confirmation on Government website. But some say the C.V. regulations were changed to law this January. Some say this could mean the Vaxx is therefore mandatory? Heard or seen anything on this? Which would also prove the Police were lying about regulations being law. Could they be prosecuted for that after the affect?
{Ed033\'s Note - People have to realise that if the government say the word \'mandatory\', it doesn\'t mean [like most everyone has been mind controlled to think] that we all have to unconditionally surrender and submit to whatever the mandatory word is attached to.
Watch the video below, \"The way we police is by consent\". Government \'laws\', rules, regulations, ordinances, statutes, acts etc are only given the force of law by the consent of the governed.
So, as long a you don\'t consent by getting into an agreement with government, this word \'mandatory\' doesn\'t mean anything to you.
Here\'s the thing, if you signed the furlough agreement, what were the full terms and conditions? Did you ask for full disclosure? If not what did you agree to?
From now on people have to do their due diligence before signing any agreement. You require full disclosure of their full terms and conditions, you might want to add in your conditions and then you can negotiate their conditions and they can negotiate your conditions. The parties then either come to agreement or not.
If you ask for full disclosure and you later find out they didn\'t give full disclosure, the agreement is void. If they won\'t allow you to negotiate the agreement, then there can\'t be agreement, because there can\'t be such thing as a unilateral agreement.
On duty Police lie anyway. The idea being [in Police handbooks] that in order to catch criminals, you might have to lie.
Watch the video below, \"The way we police is by consent\". Government \'laws\', rules, regulations, ordinances, statutes, acts etc are only given the force of law by the consent of the governed.
So, as long a you don\'t consent by getting into an agreement with government, this word \'mandatory\' doesn\'t mean anything to you.
Here\'s the thing, if you signed the furlough agreement, what were the full terms and conditions? Did you ask for full disclosure? If not what did you agree to?
From now on people have to do their due diligence before signing any agreement. You require full disclosure of their full terms and conditions, you might want to add in your conditions and then you can negotiate their conditions and they can negotiate your conditions. The parties then either come to agreement or not.
If you ask for full disclosure and you later find out they didn\'t give full disclosure, the agreement is void. If they won\'t allow you to negotiate the agreement, then there can\'t be agreement, because there can\'t be such thing as a unilateral agreement.
On duty Police lie anyway. The idea being [in Police handbooks] that in order to catch criminals, you might have to lie.
07 Feb 2021 12:38:36
Agreed Ed and am fully aware of the facts above. Due to my ill health and small private pension I’m not furloughed. My concerns aren’t for myself but for others no matter what age, colour or religion. I try and participate in a conversation with people, they look at you weirdly and say it is what it is. Even when you discuss stock markets, banks etc, most shrug their shoulders and say what can I do about it? It’s as if they are accepting their fate.
Agreed Ed and am fully aware of the facts above. Due to my ill health and small private pension I’m not furloughed. My concerns aren’t for myself but for others no matter what age, colour or religion. I try and participate in a conversation with people, they look at you weirdly and say it is what it is. Even when you discuss stock markets, banks etc, most shrug their shoulders and say what can I do about it? It’s as if they are accepting their fate.
{Ed033\'s Note - The idea being if we don\'t consent as a large group, we win, but they can\'t comprehend not consenting. How about for a start people take the masks off?
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0