26 Jul 2014 07:56:57
So there are a trillion feet of natural gas off the coast of Gaza, in palestinian waers ( isreali controlled)
If there was no blockade and gaza had a port an airport and some proper infrastructure, good education and health, power stations and water refinerys so they weren't dependant on isreal for water and electric, coupled with building the infrastructure to get the gas out.
They might become a tidy little country. could this be the real reason that isreal are trying to bomb them into insignifigance and destroy them
Fear, and to prevent them developing.
I think there is more to it that hamas rockets that are probbaly doing little to no damage, and certainly doestn warrent the response that isreal has had.
The gas is a side issue. With or without the gas, Israeli policy will be the same.
Ryan.
Ryan.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
I have heard hamas could be israeli funded and I am starting to think that now, let me run scenario this by you all.
i am a genuine hamas leader and I know my token bombs are not going to do anything but send my country back in the stone age with generations of families wiped out, I suddenly find out that we have resources that can make us all self sufficient and build a infrastructure for my people, so I decide to go down the peace route and sign a treaty, then I contact a nation that can help me get the oil out and give them a cut of any profits, like say venezuela (asking russia could be the start of ww3)then once the oil/money is rolling in I will build a port and do my own export and import deals, letting nato know everything.
thats what I would do anyway, I do not agree with any type of violence hamas or israel as it only plays into the zionists hands.
i am a genuine hamas leader and I know my token bombs are not going to do anything but send my country back in the stone age with generations of families wiped out, I suddenly find out that we have resources that can make us all self sufficient and build a infrastructure for my people, so I decide to go down the peace route and sign a treaty, then I contact a nation that can help me get the oil out and give them a cut of any profits, like say venezuela (asking russia could be the start of ww3)then once the oil/money is rolling in I will build a port and do my own export and import deals, letting nato know everything.
thats what I would do anyway, I do not agree with any type of violence hamas or israel as it only plays into the zionists hands.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
26 Jul 2014 13:45:24
I would suggest resources play a large part. Everything else is window dressing.
As for funding Hamas, its certainly a possibility. The Israeli secret services are one of the best at what they do. Via proxies and shell corporations. Maybe the funding comes from further afield?
Kim Philby
I would suggest resources play a large part. Everything else is window dressing.
As for funding Hamas, its certainly a possibility. The Israeli secret services are one of the best at what they do. Via proxies and shell corporations. Maybe the funding comes from further afield?
Kim Philby
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
26 Jul 2014 20:41:15
Frankyscouser. that would be the clever way to go about it. There seems like nothing to be gained from the violence but everything to be gained from peace.
NIV.
Frankyscouser. that would be the clever way to go about it. There seems like nothing to be gained from the violence but everything to be gained from peace.
NIV.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0