19 Jan 2014 11:24:29
Anyone see this in the Telegraph a few days ago?
A couple of interesting admissions near the bottom, one being that there's one UFO detected by air traffic controllers every month.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/ufo/10551201/Jet-in-near-miss-with-UFO.html
These types of sightings don't make much sense.
With publicly available technology (pc & internet connection) one can track the position of every commercial airplane around the world. Why would a ufo fly into their path if whoever is piloting it did not wish to be spotted?
Concerning air traffic control, the US military has had stealth aircraft for a while. Are we to believe that someone with enough knowledge to invent an anti-gravitic propulsion system does not know how to manipulate simple electromagnetic waves?
Zari
With publicly available technology (pc & internet connection) one can track the position of every commercial airplane around the world. Why would a ufo fly into their path if whoever is piloting it did not wish to be spotted?
Concerning air traffic control, the US military has had stealth aircraft for a while. Are we to believe that someone with enough knowledge to invent an anti-gravitic propulsion system does not know how to manipulate simple electromagnetic waves?
Zari
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
He is pic, and he is not going to go on the record and report it unless he is certain about what he saw. I wouldn't be too inclined to dismiss it just because I don't understand what he saw.
Ryan.
Ryan.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Ryan, I am not dismissing the claim that a ufo was sighted. I am rather wondering as to what purpose, if any, such sightings serve.
If whoever is piloting the ufo wishes to make their presence known then there are better ways of achieving that.
They do not seem to wish to remain hidden as they certainly have the technology to do so but do not use it.
Perhaps they have no interest in us and are simply performing their tasks without care of implications.
I am trying to make sense of their agenda and sharing my puzzlement with everyone in hope of a better idea.
Zari
If whoever is piloting the ufo wishes to make their presence known then there are better ways of achieving that.
They do not seem to wish to remain hidden as they certainly have the technology to do so but do not use it.
Perhaps they have no interest in us and are simply performing their tasks without care of implications.
I am trying to make sense of their agenda and sharing my puzzlement with everyone in hope of a better idea.
Zari
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Zari your comments do usually come across as somebody who has all the answers,, answers to questions that remain unanswered
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Maybe it was that kid from Flight of the Navigator ;)
Ryan.
Ryan.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Hey anon,
I have to admit that you are not the first person to share that with me. An American ex of mine used to say the exact same thing. Perhaps, it is due to a cultural barrier.
In the culture I was brought up, people's speech is direct and laconic (evidently not my strong suit) while we rely on body language and intonation to signify politeness. Using that same example and to differentiate from one another, I would consider the American way of expression as the boundary between cordiality and "sugar coating".
Granted, my social skills require refining to appeal to international audiences but as the language used in communication is subject to interpretation and thus dissimilar to scientific language, chances are someone will perceive my speech as either sugar coated or pompous irrespectively of my attempts.
In the end of the day everyone has their own filtering mechanism for analyzing information. I consider that to be the regulatory system which controls ego interference in regards to analytical processes.
Allow me to assure you that were we communicating telepathically you would not detect pompousness nor condescendingness (patronization) in our communication or perhaps I am more ignorant than I think.
Zari
I have to admit that you are not the first person to share that with me. An American ex of mine used to say the exact same thing. Perhaps, it is due to a cultural barrier.
In the culture I was brought up, people's speech is direct and laconic (evidently not my strong suit) while we rely on body language and intonation to signify politeness. Using that same example and to differentiate from one another, I would consider the American way of expression as the boundary between cordiality and "sugar coating".
Granted, my social skills require refining to appeal to international audiences but as the language used in communication is subject to interpretation and thus dissimilar to scientific language, chances are someone will perceive my speech as either sugar coated or pompous irrespectively of my attempts.
In the end of the day everyone has their own filtering mechanism for analyzing information. I consider that to be the regulatory system which controls ego interference in regards to analytical processes.
Allow me to assure you that were we communicating telepathically you would not detect pompousness nor condescendingness (patronization) in our communication or perhaps I am more ignorant than I think.
Zari
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0