10 Feb 2014 14:03:40 One of the five olympic rings failed to open dur… · #2003

The Daily Currant mentioned in the article is a satire site.
If the Seattle site wasn't a wordpress blog, I'd be more inclined to believe it, but as it is, they're not credible sources.

10 Feb 2014 16:12:40
Red is also the colour of Revolution, world Socialism, and the communist party of the soviet union.

It would not surprise him turning up dead. What surprises me is the method used, very sloppy. Maybe mokrie dela are slipping. And I cannot see an official making a statement like that. Internally we all know such things happen.

Kim Philby

Yeap you are right anon. It was a story that came from the Daily Currant and reposted everywhere. It was meant as satire but as nobody was listing the source it went unnoticed.
Zari

And yet zari you were all over it. that's the kind of conspiricy mongering that puts people off, what colour was the ring and what does it signify? iv read this page for a long time and you are definitely thee worst for this,

Unnamed poster would it not be better if you made a constructive criticism on why this topic seems fake?i tend to stick to subjects I have read or watched about but will also read other peoples links on subjects I have no idea about, instead of sniping mate give your thoughts on what you do think are real conspiracies.

Well in all honestly the unnamed poster has a great point. The story was satire, yet zari has still managed to see something that he deems a 'conspiracy' and has even added on to it by stating the colour red is significant in it. Like all conspiracy 'nuts' he is seeing far to much into things that are usually a simple!open and shut case, but even better is the fact this story is a mock. U call us sleepers and sheep for following the mainstream media and yet people like zari and co follow utter mince they see on the Internet or YouTube.

Well put it this way I would question everything good and bad that is presented to me, enjoy your sky news/bbc.

'don't know how reliable it is'

I think that means Zari was not presenting it as fact, but rather as opening a conversation.

'U call us sleepers and sheep for following the mainstream media'

You do seem to be a bit touchy about being labelled, although that is bit odd since nobody here knows your name so how could they call you anything?

Maybe you are just worried if you leave a name at the end of your paranoid little rants that over time people will see you are really quite a bitter person and have nothing constructive to add to a conversation.

Ryan.

11 Feb 2014 13:23:42
We are all here to learn. Like Mr Franky says there is a lot I do not know. We are here to share knowledge as we know things are wrong.

Kim Philby

At franky. It's great every1 has an opinion but as soon as any1 disagrees with the usual suspects on the page they get called a sheep or are told they are sleeping. I'm not the most enteligant person and I love reading what all u guys have got to say. I've learned so much reading so much on this site agreeing and disagreeing with posts but just because some off us that like the page disagree sometimes it does'nt mean we are sleepers. Thanks Stevo7

Fair point stevo I have no problem with anyone disagreeing but it bugs me when people criticize other people's post without a valid reason apart from calling someone conspiracy mongering!

I think its a conspiracy against conspiracy mongers.

The valid reason is that it was the death was a hoax, and put on the Internet. Zari believed the death, then added his own little conspiracy by claiming the colour red was a significant factor. He was duped into believing the death in the first place and then went 1 further. Next he woulda rambled on about the NWO and black tech playing a part.

Zari stated he did not know how reliable the links were and also pointing out how significant certain colors are, if you would take time to check that out you might find out something new!

To any ed, people have kept posting on this thread for a while now, while my multiple posts are not being posted.
They are evidently personally attacking me and not merely commenting on the mistakes in my post, with no other purpose but to label, distort reality and spread disinformation.
With any decency you will allow me to defend myself by allowing my post to go through.

When one goes through a lot of information they are bound to accept some of them as true when they are not.
I made a mistake and have accepted it as such as soon as it was pointed out to me. I am not infallible and have never claimed to be.
When dealing with current events it is much easier to make a mistake, as there is no clear line of sight before the dust settles.

Having said that, personally attacking someone from anonymous posts, not on a case to case basis but on all of their work because of two recent mistakes speaks volumes of your aims and characters in of itself.
Have you participated in any constructive discussions at all on this page, infallible long time readers?
Additionally, where are your factual arguments?
I have actually defended people from being labeled as sheeple etc. as we are all ignorant at one level or another. Evident use of double standards, complaining about supposedly being labeled while labeling others as "conspiracy 'nuts'".

As for one of the olympic rings not opening, that indeed happened.
But I guess all you were after was an excuse, facts don't seem to interest you.
(Imagine if I used the examples of your behaviors as a guideline for mine, what I would say now. )

http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2014/02/07/russian-music-dancing-kicks-off-olympics-opening-ceremony/

The part that came from the satiric
article and was mistakenly mixed with the real event, was the murder of the technician and the investigator's statement.
The connection made with the corresponding color of the ring in the classic colored olympic ring arrangement still stand.
Zari

Zari you made a very small error, which you graciously acknowledged very quickly. An anonymous poster jumped all over it. We all know someone like this. Someone who contributes nothing constructive or positive to anything. Someone who is too insecure to leave a name every time they post, in case they are subjected to the same level of scrutiny they apply to you.

Ryan.

Zari your input to this site is invaluable, everyone makes mistakes, you got personally attacked almost immediately after, then the poster defended himself by accusing people on here of exactly the same thing he was doing originally. You have no reason to defend yourself. You simply shared a story you read.

Hey ed, any reason why my multiple posts haven't come through?
Zari

Couldn't agree more with Zari, Ryan and other's. There is no reason to explain yourself Zari as the people who use this site for the right reasons fully appreciate the perils of searching for the truth i. e. that we will stumble across something we get wrong once in a while. Without forums like this we would have less ability to work out what is the truth in a timely manner, that is the beauty of the site. The poster who attacked you gives off the impression that he has been waiting in the wings for someone to get something wrong so he can point it out!

Zari, I have learnt a lot from your posts as well as other's so I thank you for that.

Harold

Thank you for your support guys.
Zari

Yes they have ed033. Thank you.

That was inexcusable behavior on my part. I let my frustration get the better of me. Thank you for your understanding.
Zari