18 Jul 2014 11:20:24
I do wholeheartedly agree with the 9/11 conspiracy, and don't think there was a plane.
One of the arguments is that aluminium cannot go through steel (which is obvious ) but the counter argument is suggesting that a straw can peirce trees in high speeds.
My question is depending on how fast the 'plane' was going, would it have been able too highly damage the steel (say going 10 000 km/h (sorry live in aus, don't know mph) ) would it alter it and would aluminium be able to go though steel.
Sorry, I haven't worded it well but could anybody englighten me? Cheers
{Ed033's Note - The speed of the alleged plane that hit the 2nd tower was travelling faster that it was capable of so therefore your point is mute as there was no plane. Please take notice of the below video especially after the 19 minute mark for the evidence of no plane
18 Jul 2014 13:44:41
Yeah never thought there was a plane
Cheers for the vid, will give a watch
Thanks again
Yeah never thought there was a plane
Cheers for the vid, will give a watch
Thanks again
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
It was a US drone
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0