Talk Sense discussion

06 Oct 2011 22:19Discussion #278Talk Sense

06 Oct 2011 23:18:54
Guys this is not really a conspiracy, this is what I think happened at Shanksville. I have no supporting texts but just my thoughts.

In Pennsylvania is a U.S fema camp (Camp Hill) this was apperently being renovated early in 2001. In case that some disaster happened the population could be supported. Would it not make sense to land the plane at camp hill which does have a landing strip of 1.8km. Remove the passengers, make use of the facility to see how they would cope if such an event where to happen. Then to fly the plane to the spot at shanksville and then blow it to pieces. The reason I suggest an explosion is that there were thousands of very little pieces. and a creator. this usually means an explosion. aslo the fragments that were recovered were displaced in a circle.

What do you guys think? and yes I might have a vivid imagination.

TReVoR

07 Oct 2011 09:37

You know this a Conspiracy forum right!

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

07 Oct 2011 19:11

Trevor i'm not going to discount that, something happened with that plane and that makes a lot of sense to me. {Ed033's Note - The small pieces of debris at Shanksville were allegedly spread over several miles. This would be more consistent with a plane being blown up in the air rather than on the ground. The crater on the ground could have been dug with a digger and random debris dumped into the hole using a dump truck.}

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

07 Oct 2011 20:29

A plane shot down either by air to air or surface to air missiles would leave large recognisable debris. Also, a plane blown up by onboard explosive would leave the same easily identifiable debris despite the distance the debris is spread over. It would never be reduced to small pieces. You only need to look at Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie.

Quite simply, there is no downed plane or passengers in or around Shanksville.

Paragon

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

07 Oct 2011 21:08

Flight 93 MUST have been diverted and landed safely elsewhere. What of the passengers? God only knows.

Interestingly, Flight 93, tail number N591UA was deregistered on 28th September 2005 and listed as cancelled.

Under Federal law, you are obliged to inform the FAA as to the status of a registered aircraft. In this case it would be going through the motions to obtain a death certificate if you like!

Flight 93 (Shanksville) and 175 (South tower) listed as CANCELLED 4 years later.

Flight 11 (North tower) and 77 (Pentagon) deregistered 14th January 2002 - DESTROYED

See the problem here? A plane flown into a tower and seen on TV is still around until 2005 and a plane flown into the pentagon but no one saw it is struck off in 2002.

Paragon

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

07 Oct 2011 21:54

And another point, American Airlines and United Airlines allegedly lost aircraft at the World Trade Centre. How can their planes be deregistered so far apart and how can one be DESTROYED and one CANCELLED if they suffered the same fate on the same day as we are told?

Paragon

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post