02 Oct 2014 06:01:33
{Ed033's Note - After David Cameron, told the United Nations that people who question 9/11 and 7/7 were non violent extremists, Dr. Nick Kollerstrom author of the book Terror On The Tube, which was about the anomalies of the Flase Flag 7/7 bombings, attempted to hand himself into police.
Press TV video here:
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/10/01/380620/911-uk-activist-hands-himself-in/
Cameron stooping to a new low with this one.
Ryan.
Ryan.
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Never thought myself as a extremist before.
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Lets be honest, in Cameron's world view we are extremists. When ones idea of equilibrium entails authoritarian masters and obedient slaves, then for that person we do inhabit the fringes. I honestly expect nothing more from the establishment or its pawns. Their propaganda machine reached its peak a few decades ago and is now resigned to rehashing old labels or using foreign words.
An etymological dictionary is a mans best friend when dealing with prejudice.
zari
An etymological dictionary is a mans best friend when dealing with prejudice.
zari
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Bush and Blair lied through their teeth about the existence of phantom WMD's to propagate a war against Iraq.
To me they are the real extremists and violent ones at that.
Ryan.
To me they are the real extremists and violent ones at that.
Ryan.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Hey Ryan, another reason I wouldn't call them extremists in return, is that I consider the word extremism as representing a useful teaching method.
Allow me to elaborate. Through the establishment's conditioning humans are restrained by vague notions of morality, ethos and principles. These are not evaluation systems but rather static limiting mechanisms, as they are inherited or imposed and not dynamically self created. Thus, they are not tuned to resonate with each individuals world view and as such place ones consciousness in stagnation.
For that reason extremism, or shock and awe practices, are useful for expanding ones sphere of consciousness. When a mind is trapped in a duality of e. g. what is proper and improper, both extremes of that world view must be considered so that the mind can find a new way of perceiving said duality.
The following exemplifies what I am attempting to communicate.
"Tell the devout christian you are the devil. Tell the atheist you are god. Show the mirror your reflection, for that is the masters path. "
Even though the above appears to be a philosophical analysis rather than a psychological and linguistics one, it is non-the-less a useful method for unhinging ones mind.
Having said that, everyone is entitled to their world view and is individually responsible for correlating word and meaning.
zari
Allow me to elaborate. Through the establishment's conditioning humans are restrained by vague notions of morality, ethos and principles. These are not evaluation systems but rather static limiting mechanisms, as they are inherited or imposed and not dynamically self created. Thus, they are not tuned to resonate with each individuals world view and as such place ones consciousness in stagnation.
For that reason extremism, or shock and awe practices, are useful for expanding ones sphere of consciousness. When a mind is trapped in a duality of e. g. what is proper and improper, both extremes of that world view must be considered so that the mind can find a new way of perceiving said duality.
The following exemplifies what I am attempting to communicate.
"Tell the devout christian you are the devil. Tell the atheist you are god. Show the mirror your reflection, for that is the masters path. "
Even though the above appears to be a philosophical analysis rather than a psychological and linguistics one, it is non-the-less a useful method for unhinging ones mind.
Having said that, everyone is entitled to their world view and is individually responsible for correlating word and meaning.
zari
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0