05 Dec 2011 18:02:20 Hi Ed just a quick question about your moon land… · #593

Discussion #593Talk Sense

05 Dec 2011 18:02:20
Hi Ed just a quick question about your moon landing convo earlier i have always believed that a portion of the moon landings were real and never really paid much attention to the van allan belt although i did know it was a band of radiation, So is it impossible to pass through it in a space shuttle? would you get Baked by the intensity of the radiation?

Thanks Ed

MJ

{Ed033's Note - Richard Hoagland reckons that they flew so fast through the Van Allen belts that the astronauts were only minimally affected.

There are rumours that built into the capsule around the astronauts was black technology radiation shielding which was light enough in weight to take off which was given to NASA from the secret space program separate from NASA - Anomalies on the Moon - www.youtube.com/watch?v=nK-2N4L5rCA&feature=fvsr}

 

{Ed033's Note - The secret space program allegedly encompasses a number of countries including russia and america but at a higher level than the presidential level.

There was a report called the Brookings report which all governments agreed to and that was to hide any evidence of ETs. As there is allegedly evidence of extraterrestrial activity on the moon every government has to keep quiet.

The russians can't mention black technology either so they keep quiet about the moon.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
On my flimsy knowledge it would have to have been some sort of tech we don't know about. The amount of lead needed would have doubled the weight of the rocket, which would have needed to have been double in size again, this of course leads to several obvious problems.

{Ed033's Note - Haven't you heard of black technology. Possibly et technology or ancient technology that could be 100s more advanced than you think we have.}
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Ed thats what i was alluding, some sort of tech that we, ordinary joe public don't know about.

{Ed033's Note - Ok sorry. The Nazi's had some pretty high tech as well at the end of the war with the Bell project.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Yeah thats just odd. Why did they throw so much money, time and effort into all this high end research when they were losing the war?

Ok i know the theory that they just moved underground, but its just odd to me. {Ed001's Note - because they thought it might turn the tide, the right weapon could have turned the tide if it was powerful enough.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Well the bomb certainly would have, but jet fighters and v1's wouldn't have, desperate gambles really.

{Ed033's Note - Allegedly the 2 atomic bombs dropped on Japan actually were stolen from the Nazis by General Patton. The Nazis didn't use the atomic bombs possibly because they had a far greater weapon that wasn't ready at the time which was the technology used in the Nazi Bell project - Joseph Farrell wrote a book on the Nazi Bell - here is an interview with him - www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wJboIFKCFU
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
If there were such a thing as black technology used on space shuttles y is the same material or similar used 40 years later on nuclear submarine to shield from radiation. Instead of using lead
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.