24 Feb 2020 13:44:21
If you think about it, we can\'t have the alleged vacuum of \'outer space\' directly next to our atmosphere. On Earth, if we want to create an area of different pressure, it has to be held inside a container, so is it possible that Earth is in a container?
A container has a top, bottom and sides.
The Crystal Firmament could be the top.
The bottom would be as far down we could go.
I think the sides would be beyond the Antarctic ice wall in all directions, with other worlds (with life forms) similar to our own being beyond the Antarctic ice wall. With \'Outer Space\' being anything beyond the Antarctic ice wall.
If you have seen the video on here before that was possibly showing the Firmament, then this video shows more footage of the phenomenon at the Firmament.
It also attempts to show what could be the bottom and the walls of our enclosed system.
I really can not get my head around how a pressurised atmosphere and a vacuum can sit side by side with no barrier separating them. It just wouldn\'t work.
I have had discussions where people argue that the air thins and gradually turns to a vacuum, all held in place by gravity.
If gravity was holding the air in place, how is it we get different layers of clouds moving in different direction?
And if gravity does have artificial intelligence, then we must be in an amazing creation.
At the moment their gravity answer is an all in one catch word that they hope people repeat, but don\'t think about.
Look at the crazy answer to the Michelson-Morley experiment, that the measuring apparatus itself contracts in length and changes ellipsoidal shape the exact amount to give them the exact number they need to show the Earth is rotating at the correct amount around the Sun.
Haha, subjective gravity. Don\'t give \'them\' ideas, Ed.
The Michelson-Morley experiment explanation is a joke.
Actually, the same person I spoke to about the vacuum / pressurised atmosphere, I explained the M-M experiment to them. They looked perplexed. Not from the fact they didn\'t understand what I had explained. More the fact they couldn\'t compute what the experiment concludes because it goes against their programming.
It\'s frustrating not being able to talk to intellectuals that are boxed in by MSBS thought.
But it\'s great when you see you have got through to them, on some level.
Agree Ed gravity must be cleaver because like others have said.
It knows the difference between air and helium in a ballon lol.
Also when u thought ahh I just dropped the remote,
It actually got pull out of your hand.
And if u ever want to go sky diving u will be pull to earth not fall .
I do agree atmosphere next to vacuum is near impossible.
But I\'m still sat on a painfull fence sorry SM and ed.
Sorry for what, Southampton? .
In seeking the truth, I haven\'t found the answers. It\'s just made me see the lies.
That\'s it ed33.
Soz SM just see message
I\'ve been looking into flat earth theory for years but never gone full in till late.