18 Dec 2011 15:46:28
I watched a youtube conference last week, (cant remember who was talking) but he mentioned the so called riots a few months ago, and he said that london liverpool manchester in fact everywhere, did you actually see anyone rioting?. We saw looting, we saw that tv getting ripped off the wall three times an hour every hour, we saw buildings burning but no petrol bombs thrown, going back to the toxteth riots when i was 12, we all seen the rioters on cameras/video but with all the cctv we have now, sky itv bbc show a few shops getting robbed and a crowd watching, the mainstream media done their job because people on social network sites calling for the army and real bullets, tezting the water for a police state me thinks.
Frankyscouse
{Ed033's Note - The following link is similar to what you describe above - www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=80&part=1
Basically striking never achieves anything it only costs you support. The last major successful strike in this country was the 1974 general strike which toppled the Heath govt and in the end that only caused the downfall of the unions as it helped the rise of Thatcher. When the NUM tried to repeat '74 by coming out in 1984 they had an enemy who was far tougher than Heath and she used to to break the unions. Its taken the unions 30 years to recover and there's only the public sector ones left. The over 50's fat cats that run these public sector unions remember the glory days and all they care about is getting revenge on the Tories for the 80's and trying to give Cameron a bloody nose. They will fail because like '84 they don't have widespread support, if anything they have less than they did in '84. Incidentally mnay families of the striking miners from the '84 strike are still in debt to this day.
Onto your example of France. Do you think constantly being on strike has achieved anything in France? By allowing people to retire in the early to mid 50's they have pushed up the welfare state budget massively over the years and now they cannot cope with it. This is why France is starting to creak. This is why Sarkozy wants to raise the retirement age because he knows they can't afford it. But the barricades will soon be out and they'll be on strike, maybe even win concessions and France's debts will carry on going up. So yeah the Fench have had their fun out of striking but never considered the long term consquences and now the chickens are coming home to roost because Socialists can never do long term sums.
Many working men ended up massively in debt through that strike. Where was union solidarity then? They backed the '74 strike cos they did very well out of it. In '84 they left the miners to face Thatchers crackdown. Crack police riot units bused in to smash into working guys twice there age, but the other unions did nowt to assist, barely even helping wives and young kids out in a time of need.
I come from an (extinct) mining family.
I agree there has to be balance, but i get the feeling that a lot of the modern union big wigs couldn't give a toss for the members, their too isolated away from the rank and file with their massive salaries and big houses, they've become what they once fought against, o the irony. They just want to stick it too the Tories but don't realise they have no support. They claim it was some sort of success to have 2 million out on the streets. It did nothing for them, look at how some of them have been back tracking in recent weeks.
Don't get me wrong i like France, but they always kick off over the wrong things, they've had it soft for 40 years and now its a crisis they can't cope, as usual.
frankyscouse
Tony the Tory went sucking up to the middle class to get elected whilst Gordon went bunging well off middle class doctors and teachers tax credits whilst scraping the 10p tax rate which hit the low paid working class. Now i expected that off the Tories, not my own party which is why i did not vote for them at the election and i told my sitting Labour MP that to his face. He ended up losing his seat (with re-drawn boundaries) by just 6 votes. Think it was the 2nd closest seat in the country.
Now Labour have Milliband the younger in charge, another middle class posho who doesn't know what life is like and he's a clueless muppet. Now i expect an Ed will say no mp's do know what life is like, but once Labour had people like Blunkett for example who were working class in origin, and who had respect of the core Labour voters. Now we have what?
frankyscouse
{Ed033's Note - Ed Milliband's nickname in political circles is allegedly Forest Gump.}