20 Dec 2011 22:03:40
Was watching a documentary on how supposedly Princess Diana was killed by the security services what is your view on this Eds as you seem to be in the know for most things?
Halewood Red
{Ed033's Note - Several books were written about that it was no accident - Jon King and John Beveridge wrote Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence - books.google.co.uk/books?id=AI0ui3cazTcC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Looking at the available evidence, I don't think it was an accident. For example we have:
1. All the cameras near the tunnel switched off
2. The mercedes used had been stolen at gun point earlier and then abandoned a while later (possibly to add devices)
3. The strange route to the tunnel which was the opposite direction
4. The bodyguard that survived told to keep quiet afterwards
5. The Henri Paul "drunk driver" false accusation
6. The ritual date change and ritual place of the crash
7. The quick clean up of the crime scene after the crash
8. Allegedly no one knows who the ambulance people are who took Diana to the hospital
9. The ambulance bypassed the first hospital and went to the second hospital further away
10. The ambulance took about 40 minutes to arrive at the second hospital but the journey should have taken 10 minutes
11. Diana was allegedly just seen with an injured arm and was walking about after the crash
Chris Everard produced a documentary about this called Lady Die
The driver may of been drunk too.
Its 2000', people dont care if a di was prego with a muslim b**tard child {Ed001's Note - actually there is a lot of doubt about the driver's drunken state, nothing about his driving supports that 'find'. In fact numerous tests tried out since then have shown that even hardened drinkers struggled to stand up, let alone walk naturally to a car and drive it, with the amount he was said to have drunk. I remember waking up in the night when it happened, the initial on-the-spot radio report, from a reporter who said they were at the scene reporting it, said that Di was put into the ambulance conscious. I have always wished I had taken notice of the name of the reporter etc so I could find out if they really were there.}
Its logical. {Ed001's Note - not with the amount of alcohol said to be in his system you wouldn't.}
They where on the scene in seconds and watched di die in front of them. All the time taking pictures instead of helping.
So really who is really to blame. The reporters or a drunk driver or was it a sniper who shot out one of tyers.lol {Ed001's Note - you saw it happen live on Sky News? Strange that, it wasn't live on Sky News. The reports were only coming through after the event happened. Even their initial reports from 3:24am UK time said that she had concussion and a broken arm but was alive.}
Sorry but what do you mean?
{Ed033's Note - Diana was allegedly ritually sacrificed on a ritual date and place. Pont de l'Alma in Paris where the crash took place is an ancient sacrificial site, used for the worship of the Roman Goddess, Diana. It's also allegedly a place where the european royalty went if they had an argument with each other and they would settle matters there. Diana was allegedly upsetting multiple people in "high places" for several reasons so they allegedly hatched their ritual at this location.
13 is a sacred number of Goddess Diana worship. The Mercedes car allegedly struck the 13th pillar of the tunnel. Goddess Diana was traditionally worshipped on August 13th. However in their ritual numerology if you reverse the number it would essentially mean the opposite, so if you don't want to worship diana but want to ritually sacrifice you would reverse 13 and would get 31. So August 31st would be the obvious ritual date. Princess Diana allegedly wanted to return to UK before August 31st but was allegedly told that this was impossible by the people around her. The crash happened on August 31st.
Might be something in it, might be a stratch.
Any other ritual bumppings off?