16 Jan 2012 01:43:31
what u think of the whole faul mccartney debate ed?
{Ed033's Note - I haven't seen enough info yet to believe Paul McCartney did die in 1966 and was replaced by Faul. I'm open to persuasion though. This is the newest info, I have seen - www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/FromOthers/Paul-McCartney-Italian.html
Saw a few things on this and not sure I believe it. I'm from Liverpool and let me tell you if he'd died in 66 then that would be an urban legend that'd be still going strong to this day! The fact that it is only gathering much more credence makes me think that this is one of those stories invented to debunk all conspiracy theories. 'don't you lot think there are aliens are here, oh and Paul McCartney died in 66'?
It just gives em bullets for the gun.
That's my opinion anyways.
NoneTheWiser
It just gives em bullets for the gun.
That's my opinion anyways.
NoneTheWiser
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Always liked this conspiracy as its more 'light hearted' than the stuff i normally look into, but i have to say im not a believer of the Paul is dead thing, really is joining a lot of dots up, Enjoyed researching the Elvis one too, i found that more convincing with the mispelt tombstone etc,
p.s, Anyone seen the Home Alone clip with 'Elvis', worth a watch for comedy value only
LIAM
p.s, Anyone seen the Home Alone clip with 'Elvis', worth a watch for comedy value only
LIAM
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
This article is bitter and twisted towards jews and therefore doesn't get my vote. Who would benefit from a replacement anyway?
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0