06 Jun 2013 23:26:19
just watched a documentary about the french alps murders, well I am more confused now then I was before, the documentary have said he could have been a spy or terrorist, he could have got killed by mossad or the cia or his brother could have paid for the hit. then one I have not heard before the cyclist who got shot was the intended target, one thing remains who ever paid for the assassination deemed the victims knew or had important information that got them killed.
{Ed033's Note - If it was on youtube, maybe you could reply with the youtube page url
Was that the one on More 4 or channel 4 Franky? I just watched a doc and agree its even more confusing. Can't tell who was the target. the narrator says the cyclist. the french police say no way. Confusing is right.
Captain Needa
Captain Needa
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Channel 4 mate.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
07 Jun 2013 10:19:57
TV documentallys never tell you the outright truth. They provide just enough information for both or all of the theories to seem plausible, people will split into camps depending on there beliefs, maybe have a 'mass-debate' over it and with a bit of luck want to whack each other over the head. When they say the truth is 'unknown', they are speaking with fork-tongue - it is 'known-to-one' (un-known). pea
TV documentallys never tell you the outright truth. They provide just enough information for both or all of the theories to seem plausible, people will split into camps depending on there beliefs, maybe have a 'mass-debate' over it and with a bit of luck want to whack each other over the head. When they say the truth is 'unknown', they are speaking with fork-tongue - it is 'known-to-one' (un-known). pea
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
True pea.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Speaking of TV Documentaries I watched the one on the moon landings the other night, time an time again I have said on this site that it could not be faked as the Russians would have exposed it, however after watching this doc I found myself doubting my view, it may actually be the case that it was that well done it fooled everybody!
Jonty
Jonty
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
My thinking is that it did happen but as audio you can hear on youtube the astronauts speak of see unussual crafts and being watched so NASA trying to hide this by filming the landing back on earth where would be no aliens on footage so therefore both theories are technically correct!
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
For years I believed there was no way they could discredit the moon landings, but over time I've began to have doubts. I've always wondered why the Russians never even tried to go to the moon.
The video where the same backdrop is used on two separate occasions on the moon worries me. If they really went, the Van Allen radiation belts should have been dismissed long ago, but not one astronaut has been affected.
There are just too many questions and not enough answers. After all this is the same country (corporation) that gave us JFK, 911, etc.
Ryan.
The video where the same backdrop is used on two separate occasions on the moon worries me. If they really went, the Van Allen radiation belts should have been dismissed long ago, but not one astronaut has been affected.
There are just too many questions and not enough answers. After all this is the same country (corporation) that gave us JFK, 911, etc.
Ryan.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0