16 Sep 2013 00:54:52
i found it amusing in a dark type of way that john Kerry said "the threat is real" if Syria do not give all the locations of the chemical weapons as he is sitting next to his mate Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, human rights and chemical weapons not to mention nuclear are OK for israel but my point is since Obama and his cronies have had a bloody nose over its arrogance that everyone would except their version of Assad gassing his own people, its a setback but I really think it is not over, even when Syria give NATO a map of all its cw no doubt rebels will gas some other poor victims then the Calvary will arrive like a cowboy and Indian movie, as we know now the real victims were not wearing stetson hats.
I think something major will happen in the next couple of weeks either another chem attack in syria or a " terrorist " attack on a neutral country ( canada, australia ) to try and get around the u. n. you can feel how anxious the are to get in there by the language they have been using. People are getting wise to the b. s. now franky mate!
Liono74
Liono74
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
"The threat is real. " The threat --> israel.
Part of Obama's interview on ABC broadcast on Sunday. "I think what the Iranians understand is that the nuclear issue is a far larger issue for us than the chemical weapons issue, that the threat. against Israel that a nuclear Iran poses is much closer to our core interests. My suspicion is that the Iranians recognize they shouldn’t draw a lesson that we haven’t struck [Syria] to think we won’t strike Iran. "
Syria is just a stepping stone, sooner or later they'll find/create the excuse they need to justify an all out invasion. The actual target is Iran, the only sovereign country left in the Middle East with the power to resist the controllers and influence others to do the same.
The day they get Iran, I bet you, they'll create the United States of the Middle East with its base in Israel. Then they halt their destabilizing influence in the Middle East and sell it as proof to the functionality of a one world government.
Zari
Part of Obama's interview on ABC broadcast on Sunday. "I think what the Iranians understand is that the nuclear issue is a far larger issue for us than the chemical weapons issue, that the threat. against Israel that a nuclear Iran poses is much closer to our core interests. My suspicion is that the Iranians recognize they shouldn’t draw a lesson that we haven’t struck [Syria] to think we won’t strike Iran. "
Syria is just a stepping stone, sooner or later they'll find/create the excuse they need to justify an all out invasion. The actual target is Iran, the only sovereign country left in the Middle East with the power to resist the controllers and influence others to do the same.
The day they get Iran, I bet you, they'll create the United States of the Middle East with its base in Israel. Then they halt their destabilizing influence in the Middle East and sell it as proof to the functionality of a one world government.
Zari
Agree · 4 · Disagree · 0
16 Sep 2013 14:51:07
Interesting theory Zari. Question, why have they never created a united states of south America or pulled Canada into the USA proper as both are on the doorstep. Mort
Interesting theory Zari. Question, why have they never created a united states of south America or pulled Canada into the USA proper as both are on the doorstep. Mort
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
16 Sep 2013 16:01:27
Thanks for amending that opening sentence, Zari.
Speaking of dark comedies, anyone seen 'World War Z'?
In it, 'we' were saved by Isreal and the W.H.O. pea
Thanks for amending that opening sentence, Zari.
Speaking of dark comedies, anyone seen 'World War Z'?
In it, 'we' were saved by Isreal and the W.H.O. pea
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Yeah pea funny enough I watched it a few weeks ago and at first the movie is a sub plot that was secretly saying israel were the bad guys then typical Hollywood it made out israel were trying to help Arabs from the virus, it was all downhill from there.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Hey Mort. A Union of South American Nations and an African Union are already in existence. There are also proposals in place for a Central Asian Union and a South Asia Union.
You might also want to look up NAFTA, which is a free trade agreement signed between USA, Canada and Mexico. The DEA are already active in Mexico which means that further agreements already exist between North American nations.
It doesn't really matter what name you give it or if you don't label it at all, the world is already split into "Unions". Only thing missing to formalize things are common currencies.
Zari
You might also want to look up NAFTA, which is a free trade agreement signed between USA, Canada and Mexico. The DEA are already active in Mexico which means that further agreements already exist between North American nations.
It doesn't really matter what name you give it or if you don't label it at all, the world is already split into "Unions". Only thing missing to formalize things are common currencies.
Zari
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0