18 May 2014 10:12:43
yeti and bigfoot imo have to be related, to many consequences on being allusive walking upright /food source etc etc.
to be honest I am quite surprised there was more people who thought bigfoot never existed.
{Ed033's Note - The evidence for big foot is fairly extensive, including dna. The problem is, if you have some anomalous dna which doesn't match up to any dna in the database of known living entities on Earth, mainstream science and mainstream media ignore it.
We find different species every day but the question has to be asked if they found a bigfoot it would open a can of worms about our dna and where we really came from.
{Ed033's Note - yes, it would open a can of worms
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
18 May 2014 13:27:30
I don't know much about the subject so I didn't vote. To be honest it is an area I know little about and that only thanks to this site and people on here who are interested in it. I do think it exists but I would like to raise two points.
1. Academics tend to be extremely blinkered and only look for evidence that supports their theory. Any little inconveniences that go against their work tend to be ignored at best and suppressed at worst. It gets worse when you take into account commercial funding as then they are paid to support whatever view their sponsors are pushing.
2. Who's to say that they haven't found one or at least the proof and have suppressed it as it would raise far too many questions and blow too many holes into the established wisdom
Kim Philby
I don't know much about the subject so I didn't vote. To be honest it is an area I know little about and that only thanks to this site and people on here who are interested in it. I do think it exists but I would like to raise two points.
1. Academics tend to be extremely blinkered and only look for evidence that supports their theory. Any little inconveniences that go against their work tend to be ignored at best and suppressed at worst. It gets worse when you take into account commercial funding as then they are paid to support whatever view their sponsors are pushing.
2. Who's to say that they haven't found one or at least the proof and have suppressed it as it would raise far too many questions and blow too many holes into the established wisdom
Kim Philby
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Like KP I have little knowledge so won't be voting on this one, I am open minded though and interested in any links/sources that can be shared.
Franky, I have seen the Patterson tapes before but due to my limited imagination on the subject find it hard to believe as the real thing. But then I have nothing to base this on or to compare with I just find it hard to believe the way it walks and turns around towards the camera.
I would be interested in a poll, do the patteron tapes show a real bigfoot? To see what the consensus is.
Harold
P.s. Predictive text (annoying) always changes 'franky' to 'cranky' on my phone so don't be offended if I ever refer to you as the latter it will be a mistake :D
Franky, I have seen the Patterson tapes before but due to my limited imagination on the subject find it hard to believe as the real thing. But then I have nothing to base this on or to compare with I just find it hard to believe the way it walks and turns around towards the camera.
I would be interested in a poll, do the patteron tapes show a real bigfoot? To see what the consensus is.
Harold
P.s. Predictive text (annoying) always changes 'franky' to 'cranky' on my phone so don't be offended if I ever refer to you as the latter it will be a mistake :D
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Wife calls me cranky so no sweat, the patterson tape shows no human was in a suit, the way it walks is not human like the arms are huge and swing in a ape like manner and as it turns it head you can see the muscle definition in its back and buttocks, put it this way if footage today was found I would be a lot more skeptical with hoaxes and things they can do now days , this tape is over forty years old and to stood up the test of time in my opinion.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
19 May 2014 09:30:50
Do you think Yeti and Big Foot are the same creature or separate? They could have started from a common ancestor then evolved to fit habitat?
Kim Philby
Do you think Yeti and Big Foot are the same creature or separate? They could have started from a common ancestor then evolved to fit habitat?
Kim Philby
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not same creature no but more like a cousin due to the habitat it lives in for example certain bears are similar but you can notice the difference.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0