18 Jun 2014 13:11:15
no plane hit the pentagon.
A missile possibly. Definitely not a commercial jet.
Ryan
Ryan
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Agreed, one of the clearest red flags when it comes to 9/11.
Harold
Harold
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
The Pentagon and Shanksville incidents share common ground. There is no evidence whatsoever of AA77 and UA93 crashing at either location.
For those that haven't looked up the tail numbers of all four aircraft on the FAA register; you should! It'll whet your appetite.
Look up the "N" numbers. note the dates and status of those aircraft.
I have not been able to reconcile these differences within my own mind and I have not seen or heard any compelling explanation via media outlets that could put my thoughts to bed.
Eric
For those that haven't looked up the tail numbers of all four aircraft on the FAA register; you should! It'll whet your appetite.
Look up the "N" numbers. note the dates and status of those aircraft.
I have not been able to reconcile these differences within my own mind and I have not seen or heard any compelling explanation via media outlets that could put my thoughts to bed.
Eric
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Why wouldn't you use the hologram of a comercial jet? it was dark with no logo or windows? that's what i'm having trouble with, but at the same time it does seem to melt into the building
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
I don't need to hear about holograms and other high-tech/fantasy explanations.
In one case, the pilot wasn't able to able to fly a Cessna safely. And yet an impossible high speed (above the plane's design threshold) circular descent into a building armed with anti-aircraft missiles is carried out by an inexperienced pilot who manages to hit the least precious part of the building in a manner which causes the least damage.
If you want to talk to people down the pub about 9/11, don't mention holograms, their eyes will glaze over. You don't need to; the Commission Report doesn't stack up using simple logic.
Pablo
In one case, the pilot wasn't able to able to fly a Cessna safely. And yet an impossible high speed (above the plane's design threshold) circular descent into a building armed with anti-aircraft missiles is carried out by an inexperienced pilot who manages to hit the least precious part of the building in a manner which causes the least damage.
If you want to talk to people down the pub about 9/11, don't mention holograms, their eyes will glaze over. You don't need to; the Commission Report doesn't stack up using simple logic.
Pablo
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0