26 Jun 2014 10:14:24
the star child skull is not human.
I agree.
Ryan.
Ryan.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Didn't the DNA analysis find he was human though?
Ryan.
Ryan.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Think it was inconclusive had part human and unknown dna, hybrid?
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
I watched a doc on it before was part human and inconclusive dna pal
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
{Ed033's Note - Maybe all except frankyscouser above should watch the below 2 videos to get up to speed (to 2010) on the Starchild skull
Lloyd Pye short video on the Starchild skull
Lloyd Pye short video on the Starchild skull
Starchild Skull 2010 DNA Result
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Interesting updates, I wonder if Lloyd pye got the funding?
{Ed033's Note - Lloyd Pye was looking like he was possibly starting to get the funding because of all the exposure he was receiving and then he somehow developed a really fast acting aggressive cancer (according to his ex-wife/girlfriend).
maybe someone didn't want the exposure to lead to enough money to pay for the new genetic results or we were all unlucky he developed a really fast acting aggressive cancer
maybe someone didn't want the exposure to lead to enough money to pay for the new genetic results or we were all unlucky he developed a really fast acting aggressive cancer
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Never knew he was dead, a crying shame that the good people seem to die when they can really make a positive contribution to the world and are met with a untimely death.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
28 Jun 2014 14:16:17
Sounds too suspicious to me.
Two important lessons I learnt.
1. There is no such thing as coincidence.
2. If something seems convenient then it should be trusted with suspicion.
Kim Philby
Sounds too suspicious to me.
Two important lessons I learnt.
1. There is no such thing as coincidence.
2. If something seems convenient then it should be trusted with suspicion.
Kim Philby
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0