11 Mar 2016 13:56:38
i wrote a topic about the Paris shootings a few weeks after the event and the link with the Eagles of death metal who played in the Bataclan, it was uncanny they were there when the shooting happened and also there link to the san bernardino shooting with there song
i did say at the time I found there interview after the attack seemed fake and staged but if I find out anything to contradict myself I will put it out .
i found this link about the lead singer who said things were not right that night behind the scenes.
http://goo.gl/d0vuhF
for the record I never once said they knew anything about a attack , I just found the crying staged, but that could have been shock.
on a new point I am in the process of doing a new podcast about a subject I am keen on lately, hopefully will get that out in a few weeks so edd033 will be in touch.
One thing I did find strange about the concert hall shooting.
If you were a "terrorist" and wanted to make a statement, you'd 100% shoot the guys on stage, right?
I mean if you really wanted to make the news, you'd sneak in, get on stage, shoot the band and then take aim at the crowd. At least, that's how I would have done things anyway, but luckily for the world, I am not a loonie and don't intend on shooting anyone.
the lead singer has just issued a statement apologising for suggesting the shootings were the result of an inside job, make of that what you will.
Hsf "quantity has a quality all of its own. "
Sorry but if I shot a famous person as an example - Piers Morgan, it would make the news immediately, there would be national and international tributes in the papers, social media and a huge amount of celebrities would be taking to the media to talk about it.
If I killed 10 people who were not even domestically or locally famous, then no one would care except for the family of the victims.
There would be a small bit in the paper, the local news station and radio station.
The Paris attacks made the news, sure. But only because of the attacks on Charlie Hebdo earlier on. If the lead singer or drummer got killed from the band that was playing, then we'd still be seeing it everywhere, there would be a daily countdown to the anniversary and all sorts.
When was the last time you saw a news article on the Madrid Bombing or the 7/ 7 Bombing in London? Yet we still talk about JFK and John Lennon.
I think if you killed 10 people there would be a comprehensive cover from all media for weeks.
Jfk was a world leader and probably one of the most popular presidents ever. John Lennon was one of the leading musicians of the last century. Hardly good comparisons to piers Morgan or an obscure band most people had never heard of!
Terrorism is about creating terror. Disrupting peoples lives, stopping business as usual. Slaughtering people by the dozen creates terror. Assassinating piers Morgan not as much. Its about creating the thought if we can get to them we can get to you. Articles on 7/ 7 come out every anniversary.
that's the way it has always been hsf, you could massacre 100 people in a cinema for example but if you shot dead harry styles his death would get get far more coverage, plus you would give him automatic legendary status, why? because we turn entertainers into false idols look at Hollywood, that whole place is designed for the shallow and selfish in society, whilst still being evidently racists, but they don't give a damn as long as they get awarded a Oscar to show how great they are.
it still shows where "normal folk" are in the pecking order our lives are not as important as that of famous people, plus the msm don't mention the 7/7 bombing because there are more questions than answers as regards to that incident, they don't mind us mentioning lennon and jfk as enough time has elapsed to muddy both murders, with the amount of books that have been published on both subjects.