23 Mar 2012 22:52:21
Ed, something that always bugs me about aliens (no pun intended), if they are more sophisticated and clever than us, why haven't they taken over our planet and killed/enslaved us all? Why is it not like the Spanish and the Aztecs in S.America or the Brits and native Americans in North America?
Adam
{Ed033's Note - The idea is that with most entities, the more technologically sophisticated/clever they become, the more benevolent they become. We may be being protected from 1 or more malevolent ET group(s) by 1 or more benevolent ET group(s)
Maybe on the line of we are superior to our pets and protect them.
frankyscouse
frankyscouse
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Or just maybe , its us that are the special ones , its just we dont know it , but some of the et groups do , and are fighting against us , by putting all the religion bullsh@t in our heads to mess us up and war with each other..............lfc
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Hmmm, that is a very interesting theory ed. I guess it would mean the first ETs to discover us were benovolent otherwise we would have been attacked without protection.
Adam
{Ed033's Note - We are ETs ourselves and have ET dna. We are earth dna / ET dna hybrids. ETs didn't discover us, they've been here longer than we have.
Adam
{Ed033's Note - We are ETs ourselves and have ET dna. We are earth dna / ET dna hybrids. ETs didn't discover us, they've been here longer than we have.
Agree · 4 · Disagree · 0
Perhaps they do have us enslaved? Economic crisis, fluoride etc. Perhaps they have us all trapped on this planet? We are not going anywhere because we can't. The Human race could be being managed chemically and through psychology. SJB
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Ed033 - can you direct me to the fragments of any genome that are thought to contain "ET DNA", please? My subdued pineal gland must have inhibited my recognition of this breakthrough.
Rikki
{Ed033's Note - Starchild Skull 2010 DNA Result
Rikki
{Ed033's Note - Starchild Skull 2010 DNA Result
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Just read your reply ed, crikey. The possible fact that there were ETs here before us is a bitter pill to swallow.
I thought we were the significant ones.
Adam
I thought we were the significant ones.
Adam
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Ed033 - I wouldn't usually count a video as evidence, but after looking at the website I figured it was the least flawed thing they'd produced.
All the video presents is an enlarged and deformed skull (independently suggested to be a child suffering from congenital hydrocephalus), and incoherent genetic jargon (presumably aimed at confusing people who aren't familiar with it - I had to watch it twice).
This is what I got from reading their official website and a couple of other sources: the first two independent analyses of the DNA found that it had human chromosomes, and haplogroup C mtDNA, but these two studies have been conveniently dismissed. The (outdated) procedure of shotgun analysis is usually used to reconstruct large fragments of, or entire, genomes - but here they reconstruct ~300base pairs of DNA?? The fact that this mtDNA (which has previously been independently identified as human) suddenly resembles nothing remotely human seems to suggest that the sample was either purposely contaminated, or they chose such an inefficient method of analysis to skew the results.
Before you start to bash any of the scientific "assumptions" made by me or any other dissenters here, they are the same universal assumptions made for any test, even the ones they advocate on that video as evidence for aliens.
Finally, it's a sample size of one. Even if it was an alien (it wasn't), there is no way to ever do anything more than "suggest" with a sample size of one.
Rikki
{Ed033's Note - The above video and the web site it came from is only for those with eyes to see and ears to hear.}
All the video presents is an enlarged and deformed skull (independently suggested to be a child suffering from congenital hydrocephalus), and incoherent genetic jargon (presumably aimed at confusing people who aren't familiar with it - I had to watch it twice).
This is what I got from reading their official website and a couple of other sources: the first two independent analyses of the DNA found that it had human chromosomes, and haplogroup C mtDNA, but these two studies have been conveniently dismissed. The (outdated) procedure of shotgun analysis is usually used to reconstruct large fragments of, or entire, genomes - but here they reconstruct ~300base pairs of DNA?? The fact that this mtDNA (which has previously been independently identified as human) suddenly resembles nothing remotely human seems to suggest that the sample was either purposely contaminated, or they chose such an inefficient method of analysis to skew the results.
Before you start to bash any of the scientific "assumptions" made by me or any other dissenters here, they are the same universal assumptions made for any test, even the ones they advocate on that video as evidence for aliens.
Finally, it's a sample size of one. Even if it was an alien (it wasn't), there is no way to ever do anything more than "suggest" with a sample size of one.
Rikki
{Ed033's Note - The above video and the web site it came from is only for those with eyes to see and ears to hear.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Of course, this youtube video proves that aliens bred with humans! The fact that the skull has been proved to be 100% genetically human- which was clearly the most likely explanation anyway- is irrelevant, because, just like creationists and other religious fundamentalists, you choose disregard any science that doesn't fit your beliefs as part of the 'conspiracy'. But yes, you are part alien. Of course.
WizardOzmand
WizardOzmand
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0