Talk Sense

Message from the editors

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

27 Feb 2020 09:07Discussion #11605Talk Sense

27 Feb 2020 09:29:02
The 'Stars' (Luminaries) are not what we think.

For those of you interested about Sonoluminescence (Turning sound into light) Here is a study of the phenomenon.

Sound to light article

{Ed033's Note - Great stuff SM.

Reply to this post

26 Feb 2020 16:38Discussion #11604Talk Sense

26 Feb 2020 17:13:19
Duccablue, You asked why we can't see stars on the videos shot in space.

This was NASA's first attempt at filming the stars. After seeing this, that was a completely laughable attempt at showing stars, it seems they just don't bother trying to show them at all anymore.

"Stargazer" balloon launch.

There is some confusion though with astronauts and 'experts', as to whether you can actually see stars in space, or not?

Ed03326 Feb 2020 17:17

26 Feb 2020 18:13:36
Reposts of NASA faking outer space posted originally by Souther Monkey.
1. where someone's head outside the space shuttle gets in the way of the model and 2. recent video where NASA launches a satellite into a tank of water with the lights off.
Why do they need to always fake outer space?

This is NASA footage of the STS-8 Challenger mission, 1983.

At 3min 27s you can see the launch of the satellite from the cargo bay. Does anything catch your attention at this time?

Like the giant head floating in space?

Clearly the astronaut narrating missed it.

Also, at 4m 12s, get ready to turn the Earth on!

Here is the launch of the 'Solar Orbiter' a few days ago.

7m23s switch Earth on.

7m26s - 7m30s They don't think the Earth is curved enough. 7m30s ah that's better.

You can see the underwater satellite launch at 7m37s.

Mariana trench here we come!

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Southern Monkey26 Feb 2020 19:34

26 Feb 2020 19:42:26
Just to add to this thread.

The 'experts' tell us space in Sunlight is 250C and in darkness is -140C to -170C.

If you had a standard kitchen oven big enough to fit a car in and set to max temp, circa 250C, what do think would happen? .

If you had a freezer that could hit -140C or below and put a car in it, what do you think would happen.

If you put a car in a box that went from -140C to 250C in an instant, what do you think would happen?

Now think of the fakery of Tesla's 'Starman'. Earth glitches at 3:20 and 3m36 onward you see the flat earth satellite projection spread across the 3D globe model.

and you have to love a bit of Bowie (RIP)

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Southern Monkey26 Feb 2020 18:59

26 Feb 2020 19:48:14
People, as in you the reader of this post, SPACE AS WE KNOW IT IS FAKE.

{Ed033's Note - What! All the space agencies fake Outer Space because there is no Outer Space?

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Liv4Life26 Feb 2020 22:12

26 Feb 2020 22:48:36
Ok guys i'm pretty much on board with F.E etc, just wondering about the ISS onboard tour videos where they are supposedly inside the station floating around for ages showing you around the station, it's half decent fakery.

{Ed033's Note - Hi Liv4Life, They must have learnt a few things from the movie Gravity with Sandra Bullock. They are going to get better at the fakery. The ISS onboard tour videos are like the illusionists, Criss Angel, Derren Brown, David Blaine, David Copperfield; i don't know exactly how they do the illusions, but i know they're illusions.

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

southampton26 Feb 2020 22:31

26 Feb 2020 23:02:50
Respect Ed33 And southern monkey.
Persistence is what is needed. I have been looking at space for years and love lol Listening to cox and so on .

Since five or six years ago came across flat earth. And that is when I went down the hole so much. people need to wake up and smell the coffee.
Nasa is fake.
Mainstream Education is lies.

{Ed033's Note - Imo, Brian Cox et al are paid to hypnotise the masses to keep them believing in the mainstream consensus.

Yes, NASA is Not A Space Agency.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 7 replies

Reply to this post

26 Feb 2020 16:37Discussion #11603Talk Sense

26 Feb 2020 17:00:17
I had to watch this a second time just because I couldn't believe what I heard.

Nasa fail at launching 'mammoth balloon' to 'float a satellite' in space. Hahaha, why do they need a 'balloon' to float a satellite in space?

{Ed033's Note - Great find SM, if people don't know, all of our satellites are attached to high altitude balloons.

Southern Monkey26 Feb 2020 18:59

26 Feb 2020 19:24:05
I love watching through old archive footage, Ed. Back then, 'they' didn't have to worry about whether people believed 'them' or not.

Difficult to imagine a time, nowadays, where most had to go to the cinema to watch the 'Pathe News'.

A time where, 'We', the 'public' were just in awe of the 'moving pictures', 'flicks'. And things like, 'We', 'the public's trust' of those in power', were taken advantage of far more easily.

Hang on, is that no different from today? Just that we have a far more technological 'elite', with a greater budget?

{Ed033's Note - When everyone used to gather around the wireless and later on, the T.V., the 'elite' could get people to believe whatever the 'elite' wanted them to believe. Luckily some of us have broken out because of the www.

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

25 Feb 2020 22:16Discussion #6016Talk Sense

25 Feb 2020 23:14:18
Africa in the 1700s - Not What We've Been Told.

Reply to this post

25 Feb 2020 19:19Discussion #11602Talk Sense

25 Feb 2020 18:09:36
The Actornauts in the Zero G plane.

Reply to this post

25 Feb 2020 12:37Discussion #6015Talk Sense

25 Feb 2020 13:28:39
This is crazy. The European Space agency put out a video and said it was the ISS taken from a Soyuz spacecraft. Starting at 44 seconds into the video, A clear model of the ISS is being shown to us as the real ISS.

hsf25 Feb 2020 15:03

25 Feb 2020 14:29:30
Explain how this is a clear model?

{Ed033's Note - Wow, it's obvious

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Southern Monkey25 Feb 2020 15:47

25 Feb 2020 14:46:33
Here is the full video:

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Rian25 Feb 2020 22:13

25 Feb 2020 23:05:39
Explain how it isn't hsf.

It's so fake it's hilarious.

Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0

duccablue26 Feb 2020 08:31

26 Feb 2020 08:17:07
I'm not saying I know that this is for sure the real deal but it's not obvious to me that its a model. Being an unfamiliar shape, a one off machine, and the only other examples most of us see being actual models, I can see why that connection might be made but I've got to ask, if it is genuine footage of the ISS, how would you expect it to look? How would it differ from what we see here?

Silly question maybe but related and I'm sure some of you clever dudes can explain it to me. Why don't I see any stars in this video, I would have thought being above the light pollution of the Earth, I'd see billions up there?

{Ed033's Note - They haven't put stars in the background because it would be too difficult to figure out where all the stars should be placed and how they should look.

It appears that they can never get far enough away from Earth to photograph it as a whole, this is why the Earth presented to us is strips of photographs curved around a ball in photoshop or placed into a 3d modelling software and presented to us as CGI.

Also, on a lot of the Earth from allegedly outer space, you typically don't see any recognisable land masses. Do you see any land masses in the above video. If not why not?

Also you either see clouds moving and the Earth being stationary or the Earth rotating and the clouds still or both not moving.

If you don't know, in order for the heliocentric model to work, Earth spins at around 1000 miles per hour, the Earth rotates around the Sun at 66,000 mph, the Sun moves through the Milky Way at 500,000 mph, the Milky Way moves through the Universe at over 1 million mph.

What we see with any space agency video in outer space is not consistent with the heliocentric model.

Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

25 Feb 2020 11:59Discussion #9552Talk Sense

25 Feb 2020 12:20:51
I imagine this won't get posted, like the rest of my posts for the last two weeks, but who knows maybe this will get posted.

1). If there is a dome encasing the Earth, how is it supporting it's own weight?
It would need support beams to stop it collapsing in on its self.

2). Why is the dome made of crystal like you say? There are many more natural substances out there which would be better to use.

3). You've mentioned that the Sun is within this dome, can you explain why we're not all irradiated and/ or burned to death?

4). Assuming Betelguise goes Supernova within our lifetime, how will that be explained?

{Ed033's Note - 1). This is some awesome creation we're living in and whoever created it should be able to create an impenetrable weightless barrier if they wanted to. Maybe we'll be able to do it one day if we develop the technological know how.

2. I don't know what the Firmament is made from. It could be liquid. If someone was to came up against a see through impenetrable barrier, how would people describe it? It has been described as crystal like. People can watch the videos on here that are possibly showing the Firmament at timestamp 24 Feb 2020 13:44:21 and timestamp 18 Feb 2020 07:46:28 .

3. The mainstream theory of the Sun is incorrect. We know the Sun exists because we can observe it. I don't know where the actual physical Sun is exactly located and i don't know whether the Sun we see through our Personal Atmospheric Dome (P.A.D.) is a projection of the actual Sun, but we know that we're not being irradiated and / or burned to death becuase we haven't been irradiated and / or burned to death.

4. We don't know exactly what the luminaries above us are. They could be plasma? The mainstream notion that they are Suns is just a theory. We can give names to these luminaries (such as Betelguise) and they may fade out, grow or change from time to time.

Reply to this post

25 Feb 2020 08:17Discussion #11601Talk Sense

25 Feb 2020 09:14:43
Back to a lighter tone.
Wonder how 'Sunsets' work on the Flat Earth model?

Reply to this post

24 Feb 2020 18:47Discussion #11600Talk Sense

24 Feb 2020 19:34:46
OK, so I know if a true pandemic hit the Earth, it would be a catastrophe and something I'd never wish to happen.

I just wanted to make that statement so not to appear cold to what we are being told is happening. Life is a gift in whatever form.

So, there are rallies / riots in Hong Kong for independence. Some videos showing banners asking for Trump to set them free.

A virus then shuts down China. (possibly by CCP to clear the resistance? BY the US to cripple China? I don't know)

Same virus shuts down Korea and Iran with some reports saying a different strain.

Seems a very strategic virus.

If we start getting a rise in western cases and suddenly an antiviral vaccine is released, the true agenda will be clear.

I am just trying to figure out what is actually going on. Much like all things on these pages.

{Ed033's Note - Probably be shortages of certain products in the coming months at least.

Rian25 Feb 2020 06:34

24 Feb 2020 22:12:53
Coronavirus is deadly dangerous and should be taken very seriously but I think your post is cherry picking the facts my friend SM.

Korea (you donâ€™t say which one) and Iran have not been shut down as far as I can see. Maybe I am not as up to date as you. Why would South Korea of all places be targeted?

You donâ€™t mention Italy.

Itâ€™s truly awful, but insufficient evidence to suggest it is a strategic outbreak so far.

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Southern Monkey25 Feb 2020 08:13

25 Feb 2020 08:04:26
I did mention Italy but deleted that part to make a point more obvious, I guess.

As for cherry picking, that's exactly what I have had to do. If I put down all the 'facts' I have seen but can not prove (pretty much all the news we are getting) it would make one hell of a nightmarish read and I am guessing Ed wouldn't post it.

The MS and Independent (individuals, not the newspaper) news coming in from all countries, varies wildly. And it is extremely difficult to know what the actual truth of the matter, is.

The problem I have is that SARS Ebola and Covid-19 have all been reported to have come from animals (camels, monkeys, snakes, pangolin) but there has never been any proof of this. But its always the narrative.

I guess if I am honest, it's starting to worry me a tad, and I just wanted some perspective from Ed and fellow posters.

I apologise if it appeared that I am trying to twist this into a conspiracy by omitting certain things. This was never my angle, I am just trying to figure it all out.

{Ed033's Note - At the moment if you're outside of China, you can prepare for a bad scenario the best you're able to.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

southampton25 Feb 2020 11:15

25 Feb 2020 10:44:25
It could be like the terror security link.
Coronavirus is apparently bad for 1 in 5, also bad news for people with breathing, heart problems basically people of pension age. (depopulation)

Japan just went into technical economic recession.
They blamed brexit on the older generation.
Greece, italy same as japan, china massively over populated.

They're smashing the life out of the middle east.
Australia part of agenda 21 is was burning.
Agenda 21 in full swing maybe.
Not making a joke just an opinion.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Rian25 Feb 2020 21:48

25 Feb 2020 21:52:54
Didn't mean to give you a hard time SM. I just think if you want to target specific groups a virus is probably the worst way to do it.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Southern Monkey25 Feb 2020 22:13

25 Feb 2020 23:11:01
Not if all the people 'they' wanted to be immune had, had an anti-vaccine. Either knowingly or unknowingly. Not too much of a stretch of the imagination.

This is conjecture. I don't wish to scaremonger.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 7 replies

Reply to this post

24 Feb 2020 12:46Discussion #6014Talk Sense

24 Feb 2020 13:44:21
If you think about it, we can't have the alleged vacuum of 'outer space' directly next to our atmosphere. On Earth, if we want to create an area of different pressure, it has to be held inside a container, so is it possible that Earth is in a container?

A container has a top, bottom and sides.

The Crystal Firmament could be the top.

The bottom would be as far down we could go.

I think the sides would be beyond the Antarctic ice wall in all directions, with other worlds (with life forms) similar to our own being beyond the Antarctic ice wall. With 'Outer Space' being anything beyond the Antarctic ice wall.

If you have seen the video on here before that was possibly showing the Firmament, then this video shows more footage of the phenomenon at the Firmament.

It also attempts to show what could be the bottom and the walls of our enclosed system.

Southern Monkey24 Feb 2020 17:26

24 Feb 2020 17:20:56
I really can not get my head around how a pressurised atmosphere and a vacuum can sit side by side with no barrier separating them. It just wouldn't work.

I have had discussions where people argue that the air thins and gradually turns to a vacuum, all held in place by gravity.

If gravity was holding the air in place, how is it we get different layers of clouds moving in different direction?

{Ed033's Note - I guess gravity has artificial intelligence and knows to hold down certain stuff and let other stuff do its thing.

And if gravity does have artificial intelligence, then we must be in an amazing creation.

At the moment their gravity answer is an all in one catch word that they hope people repeat, but don't think about.

Look at the crazy answer to the Michelson-Morley experiment, that the measuring apparatus itself contracts in length and changes ellipsoidal shape the exact amount to give them the exact number they need to show the Earth is rotating at the correct amount around the Sun.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Southern Monkey24 Feb 2020 18:36

24 Feb 2020 19:17:02
Haha, subjective gravity. Don't give 'them' ideas, Ed.

The Michelson-Morley experiment explanation is a joke.

Actually, the same person I spoke to about the vacuum / pressurised atmosphere, I explained the M-M experiment to them. They looked perplexed. Not from the fact they didn't understand what I had explained. More the fact they couldn't compute what the experiment concludes because it goes against their programming.

It's frustrating not being able to talk to intellectuals that are boxed in by MSBS thought.

But it's great when you see you have got through to them, on some level.

{Ed033's Note - A lot of people seem to have been hypnotised by people like Neil deGrasse Tyson and Brian Cox.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

southampton24 Feb 2020 20:10

24 Feb 2020 20:07:14
Agree Ed gravity must be cleaver because like others have said.
It knows the difference between air and helium in a ballon lol.
Also when u thought ahh I just dropped the remote,
It actually got pull out of your hand.
And if u ever want to go sky diving u will be pull to earth not fall .

I do agree atmosphere next to vacuum is near impossible.
But I'm still sat on a painfull fence sorry SM and ed.

{Ed033's Note - We all have to figure it out for ourselves.

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Southern Monkey25 Feb 2020 06:34

24 Feb 2020 21:49:20
Sorry for what, Southampton? .

In seeking the truth, I haven't found the answers. It's just made me see the lies.

{Ed033's Note - It's difficult to come up with an overall theory.

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

southampton25 Feb 2020 06:34

24 Feb 2020 23:25:25
That's it ed33.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 6 replies

Reply to this post

24 Feb 2020 05:52Discussion #11599Talk Sense

24 Feb 2020 06:10:38
The 'Waters Above'?

A closer look at one of the lighter than air gases that causes daylight, its colors and its energies.

{Ed033's Note - Great video, thanks, SM

Reply to this post

23 Feb 2020 20:08Discussion #11598Talk Sense

23 Feb 2020 19:48:43
Petrified Remains Of A Titan - 100% Biological

{Ed033's Note - Nice find, SM. If people have seen other videos of petrified giant fauna and flora, then this looks 100% biological. Definitely looks like biological fauna to me.

However, if people haven't seen previous videos of petrified giant fauna / flora, then they'll likely think this guy is nuts.

He isn't nuts.

Southern Monkey24 Feb 2020 05:19

23 Feb 2020 22:02:52
I did think it would be a big step watching this, for someone that hadn't look into Our ancient petrified past before. But hoped it would spark a few to think about it. As you say, this is obviously petrified biological matter.

I don't believe he is nuts. But I suspect the people who do, think the same about us, Ed, and are probably on the wrong page.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

Talk Sense

Create a new post

Create New Post