Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.
15 Nov 2016 09:10:56 Embarrassing, the comments made and not by the male.
{Ed033's Note - i bet there's loads of people about who think they're totally up to speed watching the BBC news, BBC Newsnight and BBC Question Time and don't realise how incorrect they are.
15 Nov 2016 11:23:59 She failed to explain how Trump is racist. Then she says as a white man you don't get to define what racism is. What patronising garbage. Media now talking about white privilege, white supremacy etc. This stuff is poisoning. I detest the BBC. The institution is not only corrupt but filed with Jimmy Savilles as well.
{Ed033's Note - yes, British Brainwashing Corporation that exists for one only purpose.
15 Nov 2016 13:45:45 There are disgusting levels of racism in the US, but rather than direct her anger at Trump, this woman might want to ask Barack Obama why did things actually get worse for black Americans under his presidency?
{Ed001's Note - I think that can be explained by everything Obama tried to do being blocked by a Republican congress etc. As for Trump, it can be explained by the simple fact he labelled all Mexicans as rapists. That is a racist statement right there. Any moron that believes the son of a KKK head, as Trump is, that has shown no inclination to distance himself from the beliefs of his father, in fact going so far as to talk about what a wonderful man his father was, is not racist, needs to really look at themselves in the mirror.
All this pointing fingers at the BBC is irrelevant. Hiding away from the real issue of everyone jumping behind a member of the establishment, a man born into billions and then not realising they have been duped into doing exactly what the powers that be wanted. Trump is one of the boys, born into wealth, with a vice-president that makes Clinton seem like a nice person. Still he has been endorsed by the KKK and Nigel Farage, so he must be ok right?}
"When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people. "
He did insult Mexicans, but I haven't seen the quote where he says all Mexicans are rapists.
I don't like Trump, but Clinton would have been a nightmare for Russia and the middle east.
It's disappointing to hear Chimamanda Ngozi Adichiesay say that as a white man you don't get to define what racism is. By saying this, she is trying to create a hierarchy on the subject, and narrow the conversation, which is a pity.
{Ed033's Note - Another typical BBC set up to try to get people to dislike Trump before he has even done anything and continue to press the racist, politically correct agenda. The American people endorsed Trump when they elected him, now we wait to see what he will do and can do.
15 Nov 2016 18:09:26 If you can read that quote and not see the racism then take yourself outside for a stern chat. Even a generous interpretation of this quote is that he's only calling illegal immigrants rapists and drug dealers, but seeing that represents 6.5 million Mexicans that's a hugely derogatory statement which is based on zero factual information, it is textbook bigotry against a racial minority, so yes, it absolutely is a racist statement. And don't try the 'he obviously didn't mean all of them' card because the message he gave was very deliberate.
As for the who gets to define racism it is not for the person accused of racism to decide whether their actions are racist or not, funnily enough, very few racists can admit that is what they are. In the above video it is not that the KKK have endorsed Trump that is important, all candidates have crazy groups on their side. What is important is that Trump has said nothing on the subject, by not condemning them he shows that the support of racists is more important to him than the issue of racism itself and that is why he is being so strongly condemned.
{Ed033's Note - That's a funny read as you seem to be either repeating the MSM who think they can read Trump's mind or you're saying yourself that you're capable of reading Trump's mind.
Let's face it, no one can read Trump's mind. And no one knows yet how Donald Trump will perform as President.
15 Nov 2016 19:31:20 Donald Trump turned 1 million (given to him by his father) into billions. Not something many would and could do. He didn't generalise all Mexicans as rapists either. He also denounced the KKK endorsement. He's far from an angel and has had bankruptcies, however I'm glad people are not voting for personalities anymore, even long pasts.
Nigel Farage was at the forefront of Brexit, I couldn't care less about the man. He achieved something great there. The BBC comments aren't irrelevant either, spewing garbage as it usually does and corrupt media I doubt is irrelevant.
On Obama, Congress didn't stop him from the mess in the Middle East and the shambles of Obamacare. His insults towards Christianity and his silence on radical Islam.
Obama Has Sentenced Whistleblowers to 31 times the jail time of all prior U.S. Presidents combined. If the truth was to come out on Bengazi, Obama would be impeached. Obama is as evil and corrupt as they come, he is another globalist puppet. I could go on, give me a break.
I'm willing like many to give Trump a shot. You can generalise me with many as a moron, I couldn't care less.
14 Nov 2016 11:17:53 Can the crooked Clintons bribe 33 electors of the Electoral College to steal the Presidency on December 19? Yes, it is possible, but highly unlikely.
13 Nov 2016 22:14:59 More scaremongering from the climate change brigade. But there is plenty of uncertainty and disagreement within the scientific community if you look beyond the headlines. They really don't know, and opinions vary greatly from one scientific group to the next.
Of course the biggest shock here is that the scientists allow their names to be attached to their findings. Unlike the carbon dating scientific community where everyone is working in secrecy according to KP and Ed001. Well, apart from any of the published lists of hundreds of carbon dating laboratories around the world anyway :)
A couple of quotes from the article Ed033 kindly shared.
Dr Tobias Friedrich, one of the authors of the paper, said: “Our results imply that the Earth’s sensitivity to variations in atmospheric carbon dioxide increases as the climate warms.
“Currently, our planet is in a warm phase – an interglacial period – and the associated increased climate sensitivity needs to be taken into account for future projections of warming induced by human activities.
Dr Andrey Ganopolski, who was involved in the research and on the IPCC’s latest report, admitted their work was controversial with some scientists disagreeing and others agreeing with their findings.
14 Nov 2016 12:09:18 There is plenty of disagreement about the details but there is a tiny amount of disagreement that climate change is happening, is effected by man or that it will impact us negatively.
14 Nov 2016 15:40:37 If you mean affected by man, as in, impacted upon by us, then yes I am inclined to agree. If you mean effected by man, as in brought about by us, then no, I don't believe so. We're almost certainly making things worse, but we're not the cause per se. Climate change is an inevitable consequence of climate.
