Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.
11 Jun 2016 19:20:58 Should we here in the UK decide to vote to leave the sham that is the European Union this month, would anyone put it past Westminster to deny us the break away or make us all go through this again with another referendum. And if they were to deny us'could anyone see there being widespread civil unrest?
12 Jun 2016 01:12:14 Big amount of England fans French and Russian fans in mass fighting Not seen that in awhile from fans And England fans have been heard singing Before fights kicked off F**k you Europe Were all voting out.
12 Jun 2016 15:28:27 French has been on tenterhooks, the Russian football fans have previous as do some English fans. The scenes are unsavoury but shouldn't be wholly surprising.
As for the vote still don't expect us to leave think most will vote remain at the final moment, the best we can hope for if we remain is another election. I expect that to be highly unlikely though.
12 Jun 2016 23:57:42 If we stay I think it will be rigged not that people didn't vote out Only reason cons won like they did is becuase a lot of people knew that was the only real chance of EU referendum other option ukip would never get in A lot if not more of the original cons voters will never vote in Most labour voters will not vote in as the hole reason labour are there is to be the oppersiton that stood for the working class Lib dem voters just 1000 percent deluded just look at clegg and they loved him and most students are lib dem Then there are the thousands of family members with children unable to move out My mate was on the phone earlier saying that it's hard to move and he run two small company's.
11 Jun 2016 13:29:07 So you can now buy a spray to be black? What next? Gay for the day spray? All this marketing of products playing a small roll in the creation of an non raced non gendered human.
11 Jun 2016 17:39:00 So are you saying its now acceptable in the eyes of SJW's to "black up"? A few years ago you would have been dragged into court for it. Why would anyone want to be black or any other colour for that matter for a day? Just be happy with the skin colour you were given.
11 Jun 2016 08:19:35 Anything significant about two major, and I mean major archaeological finds in the last two days? One under Petra and one sprawling metropolis near Angkor what - both seemingly will change the way we view these areas and each civilisation.
09 Jun 2016 22:17:58 Ed I apologise in advance but the media coverage is grinding my gears again. I decided to watch the debate on ITV, I am genuinely interested and I also how the arguments play out. But on the news after rather than giving a 50/ 50 split it was all how the remain campaign was going after Boris. This whole thing is much bigger than the characters it's about our futures. But I'm surprised how little the arguments about TTIP are being focussed on or even the closer union of Europe.
The leave campaign really haven't got an argument against this £350m figure that or what will happen to the economy. However if we do leave, do you expect are membership to be repackaged and sold to us as something else?
{Ed033's Note - You just have to remember one thing; when the controllers show you an individual agenda, then they will keep with it until they succeed with it.
For example, turning the whole of Palestine into Israel and removing all Palestinians/non Jews from Palestine. That has essentially happened in our lifetimes.
Another individual agenda is creating 'Greater Israel', which is an area from the Nile to the Euphrates and removing all non Jews from that area and sending them into Europe.
Another individual agenda is to have 100% of human food being genetically modified, which would mean (as shown on this site many times before, humans would become sterile in about 5 generations afterwards) that humans would have to become genetically modified and / or 'robotised' in order to continue. Futurists see humans becoming genetically modified and 'robotised'.
As the controllers always require slave units to carry out work for them, it is obvious that they are going to modify humans into 'better' slave units than we currently are. The NASA 'War Document', which i have put videos about on this site many times before, calls for humans to be modified or replaced as they are too weak, too soft, too big and use up too many resources.
In America they have genetically modified food that doesn't have to be labelled as GMO, however in Europe it's currently different with GMO foods as we've largely rejected GMOs, but part of TTIP is to get GMO food into Europe without it being labelled as GMO, to forward the genetically modified food individual agenda.
What i'm saying is; it is irrelevant whether UK 'Remains' or 'Leaves' because the individual agendas will continue, because it doesn't matter which 'Party' people vote in, the 'government' will continue to forward the individual agendas of the controllers.
What do you make of the registration period to vote being extended?
{Ed033's Note - It appears that the government seems to think that there will be more 'Remain' voters registering if they extend it than 'Leave' votes, so they are extending it for extra 'Remain' votes.
08 Jun 2016 21:12:09 If they will rig it anyway what is the point?
{Ed033's Note - At Cameron's level, they have no power to rig and don't know about rigging taking place, At Cameron's level, they only know that the 'Remain' vote is what they're looking for.
08 Jun 2016 22:58:32 Stinks of "fright" to me, remain must be s*****g blue bricks to pull this stunt, I'm hoping it blows up in their collective faces.
08 Jun 2016 23:04:10 Ahh I see. I see you mention Cameron's level. Who would be above his level?
{Ed033's Note - i don't know their names, but think about it, cameron has very limited power to do anything. How can he possibly have any power to create any false flag, and yet false flags happen. They are instigated above his level.
07 Jun 2016 09:52:13 Seen the richplanet video below, I like Richard D. Hall a lot and it was no great shock his tv show was taken off.
one thing stood out for me it was the power of questioning holocaust. hall would not touch or should I say even give his opinion. we have hall question the official verdict of murder of a child and innocent civilian's like 9/11, 7/7.
I am not blaming him, but I was took aback by his thoughts and not give the dr. his platform, it does not mean he had to agree with him.
another thing, if his tv show was on the line and they warned him, then I could sort of see his view, but it had already been taken off?
{Ed033's Note - That's why there should be a frankyscouser tv show.
07 Jun 2016 10:57:01 cheers edd, any thoughts on why icke and hall who are very outspoken will not touch this?
I get the anti semitic card and I know from personal experience how it is played out, I have been accused of that crap from the jewish chronicle editor to a guy from Australia who tried to goad me.
since they cannot find anything anti semitic, I am now classed as a holocaust denier, even though I maintain I am open minded and it should be debated on msm from both sides but at least have the debate.
{Ed033's Note - imo, in order to stay as a 'respectable' evidence based researcher, Richard D. Hall cannot get into certain issues as it would ruin the whole 'respectable' image and he would lose a percentage of his audience.
What's the only funny thing about David Icke is when he talks about people having limits on what they think, say and do [and he is saying he has no limits], but David Icke has limits and there is an edge he won't go beyond because a lot of his audience has limits and edges themselves and he would lose a large portion of his audience if he was to go beyond where he currently stays.
07 Jun 2016 14:47:45 correct, he mentions we never think outside the box but that is never brought up?
hall is a clever guy and reading between the lines if he never believed the professor beliefs he would have made it perfectly clear and put his own take on it, like he has done on many other subjects .
funny enough I had a great free thinking video made by some guy who was asking followers for subjects and people they could talk to, I suggested dennis wise, I got a direct message a few minutes later excited and could I get in touch with him (I follow wise on twitter) I said I could but he is very open if you want to contact him,
cut a long story short once they knew what wise talked about they bailed.
as we talk about this subject, I have just found my new podcast idea, going to take a while judging by the other two and no doubt there will be a backlash once its made, but what will be will be.
07 Jun 2016 16:56:39 Its understandable. These guys are trying to break the programming of people. To do that you don't go straight for the big lie first ball. You start with the smaller things and slowly change the position around so one day at a certain point they wake up and see the big lie.
Its a classic technique. Jumping in both feet first on a controversial topic will lose people. Starting off on something smaller, more relevant, draws people in.
Its similar to dog whistling in politics. Or the textbook way if recruiting assets who are disillusioned with things. Softly and slowly hook the ones who might be receptive and show them a different view. Let them take the steps beyond but if you've done it right you've got them.
Remember your competing for peoples hearts and minds and look at what your up against. Small steps.
07 Jun 2016 18:18:57 Denying the holocaust ever happened is wrong in my opinion. There is enough evidence to suggest that a lot of people died in these labour camps, but I don't personally believe the whole 6 million jewish people killed story. If I remember rightly, it wasn't just Jews that were put into these camps, Black people, gay people, disabled people, people who didn't agree with what was happening etc, they were all put into camps, not just the Jews.
{Ed033's Note - The agenda called for thousands of youngish fit jews to go and live and work in the desert in Palestine and fight palestinians for the rest of their lives in order to create the state of Israel. Not something you'd volunteer to do without a good reason.
The nazis required slave labour for their work camps. The choice for the youngish fit Jews boiled down to slave labour camp or Palestine.
A lot of the so called 'undesirables' in Germany who weren't Jews, homeless people, homosexuals, communists, gypsies, murderers, paedophiles, mentally ill people and outspoken anti-nazi dissenters and jews who weren't youngish and fit or refused to go to palestine went to the slave labour camps.
At the slave labour camps, if you wouldn't or couldn't work, then you were shot, but you weren't killed if you worked.
Late on in the war, not a lot of food got to the camps and the camps suffered from starvation and typhus epidemics, which is why you see in the pictures of the dead bodies of the people in the camps having emaciated bodies.
The 6 million figure is a ritualistic number they got from the kabbala. After world war one, the jewish elite were claiming that 6 million jews had died in WWI. It appears that someone made up that it would take 6 million dead jews before israel could come into being. So for ritual prophesy reasons is why they want the 6 million figure.
But they have been reducing the 6 million number since WWII as it can't stand up to any scrutiny. It appears now that around 300,000 people died in the camps, half of them being jews.
07 Jun 2016 19:06:37 hall I can understand icke has a worldwide following and it would impact him less, I am not saying he even has to believe the theory but at least acknowledge some people think this happened .
07 Jun 2016 04:49:38 Hello guys, I've seen some videos over the years which are about racism, xenophobia, segregation and equality.
A lot of the views of some groups which are against same sex marriage or ethnic communities etc are considered homophobic or racist. I was just wondering what your guys views were? For example:
Is being against same sex marriage homophobic?
Is it considered racist if you dislike someone else's culture?
{Ed001's Note - surely it depends on why you are against them, not just purely being against something?}
07 Jun 2016 17:05:36 Dont worry about it I have done that before.
I think a lot of the problem is religion. For example most of the opposition to abortion, same sex marriage etc is the conservative religious right.
Close to where I live is a large Asian community. Who all seem to get on with non Asians but can't get on with each other. The Sikhs and the Hindus don't like the Muslims. The Muslims don't like the Hindus. Its a right palaver remembering which shop keeper is what religion. Although if you like spicy food try and memorise which temples have festivals on there is usually someone with free samples and its a good way to get talking. I find the Sikhs very hospitable.
I'll give you some examples from the soviet union too. If you were from a non Russian minority then were looked down upon. Especially the central Asians, Kazakhs etc, the Caucasus's especially Chechens. The Georgians and Ukrainians in particular were singled out for russification. And then the Jews.
I knew people, wonderfully talented, skilled, competent, efficient professionals who could only rise so far because they were from a non Russian minority.
08 Jun 2016 17:48:04 Yeah, my point was something religious based, I think I smoked too much that night, damn it ¬_¬
Is there still some prejudice now with Russia and Kazakhstan? I remember thinking that Gennady Golovkin (Kazakhstan Boxer) was Russian and a Russian guy got really mad with me, screaming "NO HE IS KAZAKH NOT RUSSIAN! "
It was like I'd taken a crap on his ancestors grave or something, such fury.
16 Jun 2016 13:51:08 Lol I said to a Estonian wots Russia like and he looked at me like Hmmm You look at a unwanted Xmas pair of socks Lol Then said he didn't like it and with a bit more anger said I'm Estonian not Russian lol.
07 Jun 2016 00:57:48 I don't know if I heard right but I could swear I heard trump say if he was elected he would print out the 13 trillion Cash lol And pay the national debt without it effecting the currency? Did I hear this or anyone else?
06 Jun 2016 11:43:48 The promotion of gender neutrality is another thing of concern and no doubt it's repetition by the major media companies will be sowing seeds of acceptance in the minds of the sheeple. A small piece in the jigsaw of the depopulation programme.
{Ed033's Note - This gender neutrality has started well for the controllers in Sweden, where a lot of the young mothers are embracing it for their children. In sweden they have invented a new genderless pronoun, 'Hen', with the agenda to eradicate male and female completely from society.
Hopefully when men start going into women's changing rooms by claiming they identify as female gender, women will 'wake up', but i doubt it.
If you want to know the long term goal for the population, it is to have the population as pure slave units like Star Trek 'Borg' entities, which are neither male nor female and cannot reproduce.
06 Jun 2016 14:25:35 You can see that in northwestern Europe at least they have been emasculating men psychologically for many years through the mainstream media.
And they have also been deliberately emasculating men physically because of the use of certain chemicals in most products.
06 Jun 2016 16:43:28 Why is it so we are more easily control population as a hole as well as the numbers in population? And it shows the f up mindset of these people . One thing I ve found supriseing is the pedofile that just got sentence he deserves for once instead of getting a few years!
