Talk Sense

Message from the editors

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

Discussion #10417Talk Sense

08 Oct 2013 22:20:21
Hi guys,

I'm pretty new to the site but i'm gripped already! I'm sceptical about everything tbh, it takes a lot for me to believe a theory (best way to be imo) but the more I research the more I find things don't add up in terms of what we are told in the mainstream media and by politicians (shock horror!).

Quick shout out to ed033 here and the other ed's who make the site great.

Anyway, I've been reading a lot into the rothschilds and how they possibly were 1 of the powerhouses behind the modern version of nwo. Whether it's all true or not I find their story fascinating and its clear they amassed an incredible amount of wealth and power through the 1800's and 1900's. I find it fascinating.

I'm just wondering what peoples thoughts are on them in this day and age? Have they lost most of their fortunes as they say or are they just better at hiding it? Also, does anybody know if any of the rothschilds are still active in bilderberg or similar groups? or have they in fact lost some of the power they once had along with their great wealth?

Just after opinions more than anything, thanks in advance for any input.

Hb

 

frankyscouser
We have spoke about this subject many times about the Rothschild holding any clout today and the majority think yes, I have the opinion that they do not pull the strings, I am not saying they are not very powerful and wealthy but I think they have to answer to someone else one way or another.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Cheers franky, tbh that's the impression I get too. If that is not the case then they do a really good job of hiding it these days. Still find it all fascinating

Hb
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #1969Talk Sense

08 Oct 2013 20:16:04
Here's a clip on the BBC and their cover up on 9/11

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrZaSKqXDX8

Geordie Al

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10416Talk Sense

08 Oct 2013 15:26:25
Satanism in the music industry Any1 know much about it?


Geordie Al

 

frankyscouser
Its not really my subject sorry geordie.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
08 Oct 2013 20:10:36
Well, it conjures up a few images (including, but not limited to);
- Insidious military involvement (sub-topic; satanism and the military)
- An influential perch for misfit kids of powerful families
- The Ordo Templi Orientis or O. T. O.
- Culture Creation
- Backmasking
- Elderly, mysterious tweed wearing puppet masters
- and why don't we add (alleged) parties involving (literally) wheelbarrows full of drugs, helicopter loads of groupies, and priests? pea

song - devo, it's a beautiful world
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGEWksYA5Ys
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
football-crown Ed007
Here is a good site as a starting point Al, it's what I showed my Mrs to get her interested in reading up more about it. Again, like the Disney stuff it is 'celebrity' enough to hold people's attention who wouldn't normally read up on these matters.

www.hollywoodilluminati.com/
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Cheers lads. What got me interested was all that stuff that happened at the super bowl. With the blackout etc.

Geordie Al
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
An interesting short collection of clips on the subject. I find the statement by Bob Dylan at the start of this fascinating.

http://humansarefree.com/2013/05/exposed-satanism-in-music-and-film.html

Captain Needa
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9034Talk Sense

08 Oct 2013 11:17:14
i never really thought about this topic until I watched this, when was the last time there was a genuine live feed in the news? maybe 9/11? since then I can not think of any, all mainstream media outlets are propaganda.

CNN Faking news

 

Not Registered
Like the BBC Reporter on 9/11 where she said Building 7 has now fallen but you could see it clearly in the back ground for a further 22minutes.

Geordie Al
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Whether people choose to see it or not, the mainstream news channels are effectively presenting us with propaganda bulletins which they call the news.

At least when the adverts come on, it's clear that a company is trying to sell you something. But the news is no different. It's carefully packaged and presented too, because someone out there will profit from selling you their carefully spun version of what did or didn't happen today.

Ryan.
Agree · 4 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #2473Talk Sense

07 Oct 2013 15:59:17
I seen further down the page someone mentioning Walt Disney and Disney in general. This is actually something I have done a fair amount of reading into since I started reading and editing the sites. Here are some links that people might find interesting reads.

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/the_disney_bloodlinept1.htm

http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Disney/Perverts.html

http://theconspiracyzone.podcastpeople.com/posts/32979

This is only scratching the surface but one thing that I have noticed recently is the graphics that have been released on the internet for the upcoming Star Wars films. If you google 'Star Wars Episode 7 Legacy of the Empire' you will see a poster (I don't know who made it or where it came from, sorry) that looks very 'Disney' in it's appearance, the buildings in the skyline are phallic in appearance, a well documented trait of Disney and their films.

 

Not Registered
I've just googled your last bit, thanks ed, looks like you looking at the disney castle but a darker version.
I took my kids to orlando this summer, did the "star tours" ride at disney and it's now somehow developed a Pyramid logo.

Supasub
{Ed007's Note - I checked after my post (just to make sure I wasn't imagining it lol) and it is from the cover of the Little Mermaid but there are loads of them in their films. I think it is a good starting point for people reading into the Illuminati and such things. The 'celebrity' factor is enough to hold your attention and it will lead you into some very interesting topics. There is also a door in Disneyland that has a mysterious '33' above it. I have read reports of kids going missing there and being found dressed as the opposite sex, had their hair cuts etc etc. There is definitely something sinister going on there, of that I have no doubt.}
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Do you think the 33 is a reference to a level of freemasonry ed? Just the first thing I thought of.
That little mermaid poster you mention has an unmistakable picture in the middle of the golden disney castle that could not have got there by mistake by any stretch of the imagination.

Supasub
{Ed002's Note - No - Freemasons were not ones to advertise. There is nothing sinister at all.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
That poster was made by a fan of star wars 2 websites I seen it on confirmed that. This ain't me shooting down the whole Disney conspiracy just the poster bit
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
If you get a mo killah, have a look at the middle of the gold disney castle on the little mermaid poster.
It can't be there by mistake. Just 1 of quite a few plants imo.

Supasub
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Here is a short 10 minute clip dealing with Disney's subliminal messages

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5ubZ_QNn1Y
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 11 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #1968Talk Sense

07 Oct 2013 15:42:05
http://youtu.be/rhWqfPeerbo

A very didsturbing video of George bush at the school on the day of 9/11

What does everybody think of this?

Much appreciated

Aron

 

Not Registered
Aron I only saw this a few weeks ago for the first time, and if it's real (and I'm not suggesting it isn't) then it's very damning indeed.

Ryan.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
frankyscouser
Yeah me to guys seen this a few weeks ago, I can not give a rational answer to the clip, coincidence/sick joke?have not got a clue.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
I have to admit to being a little suspicious that it's only surfaced recently. It's possible that it could be fake. I just don't know to be honest.

Ryan.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
I saw that quite a while ago. It was also on a documentary from the BBC about what the preswident was doing on the day of the attacks.

If its on the BBC it must be true

Geordie Al
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
If its on the BBC it must be true - classic Al:)

I'm beginning to think it might be real but the words the kids are reciting are

kite
hit
steel
playing (sounds like?)
must

Bush looks uncomfortable. Wonder why?

Ryan.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #1967Talk Sense

07 Oct 2013 10:46:08
RT interview which includes the FBI/CIA were at Michael Hastings' house the day before he died
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EysdTBx-ShI

I also saw the piers morgan interview with his wife http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtJvEEglvxE

I don't think I have ever seen someone so happy that their husband has died which makes me think that the whole interview is just a huge cover up. what's your opinion ed?

 

{Ed033's Note - It's strange that his wife thinks it was just a tragic accident, unless she has been threatened or she thinks if she says anything other than it was a tragic accident, they might do something to her.
Not Registered
his wife actually threatened to 'Bring those who murdered him to justice' shortly after the death.

Then a few weeks later, released a statement accepting it as an accident. Very Strange.

Exotiva
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10415Talk Sense

07 Oct 2013 10:53:24
Done quite a bit of reading on the black knight satellite and I'm still no further on a conclusion. Seen the thermal cover explanation, but with further research it's obv not a thermal cover, especially when you see about its polar orbit and the fact it's been up there before we managed to get out into space, and even NASA admitting (apparently) that they have no clue exactly what it is!
Any other opinions would be very much appreciated!

Peace

Jay
Glasgow

 

frankyscouser
Welcome bk jay, until today I have never heard of the black night satellite and when I get time I will look in to it and give you my opinion.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
I have had a look at a few vids on You Tube, it would appear that it has been coming and going since the 60's seems to be a strange one but not enough info out there to make a judgement one thing I am certain is that it's not a blanket that fell from a shuttle which is what NASA is trying to say.

Jonty
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Thanks for the reply jonyt!
I know, that's one of the worst explanations ever. As you've probably seen, that thing has been out there before we were, so doesn't make sense.
Maybe one day we will know for sure, find it strange that it goes missing for a while then apparently comes back.
Like you said, not really a great deal of info on it. Some good discussions on other sites though!

Peace

Jay
Glasgow
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10414Talk Sense

06 Oct 2013 20:22:34
Was having a browse on youtube last night and came across this, Devil Pentagram in Kazakhstan on Google Maps, you can check it out for yourself, and here's a video showing it aswell. It's quite scary.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IycUDMZnvTk

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #1966Talk Sense

06 Oct 2013 19:57:26
Exposing the fraud of 9/11 in 22 minutes

Ryan.

 

Garbo
Brilliant vid Ryan, cheers
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
Wow total total eye opener
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10413Talk Sense

06 Oct 2013 14:20:28
We're told that Satam al Suqami's passport was picked up by a passer-by and given to a detective shortly before the WTC towers collapsed. So no trace of the aircraft but a piece of paper flew out of the aircraft/building and landed in the rubble, almost intact.

11 years later someone miraculously finds part of an aircraft engine 3 blocks away from the south tower. Trouble is it's a CFM56, is from a 737 not the 767 alleged to have struck the South Tower.

It's the same story with the Pentagon JT8D engine that was identified that was not from Flight 77.

Alleged hijacker Ziad Jarrah's visa was supposedly found in the remains of Flight 93 at Shanksville.

Ryan.    

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #10412Talk Sense

06 Oct 2013 10:41:09
And ed, don't forget that te whole top floors that weighed so much had to come down on the below building, too much weight for the girders, because when one girder goes, everything goes.

Gobblemaster

 

{Ed001's Note - utter lies. Your knowledge of basic physics is non-existent if you think that. There would be twisting, moving, sliding forces impacting on the building. None of that was in evidence. They simply collapsed in a cloud of dust, there was no lateral movement whatsoever. If one girder went up near the top, why did that floor not collapse over towards and bend? Why did it simply drop down? Even Hollywood film effects wouldn't make such a ludicrous attempt at a building collapse on film, because it simply doesn't happen. That is why recent films, such as the Transformers: Dark of the Moon and Avengers Assemble don't have tower blocks collapsing when hit by the aliens. They base their effects on what it is believed would really happen, they spend a lot of money on the special effects computers, which use physics modeling to decide how to make the effects. Why did they not show their tower blocks all collapsing after a hit? Surely, if your ludicrous nonsensical assertions were correct, they would want to do that, as it would make for exciting scenes as they crumbled away on screen.}
Not Registered
Why would a building be heavier at the top than the rest of it gobblemaster? Dear me.

Supasub
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
frankyscouser
Gobblemaster I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with anything on this site but mate you come across as a troll and your looking for a wind up.
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
06 Oct 2013 12:38:03
But ed, the paper and wood inside the building is flammable and made the fuel temperature even hotter which melted the steel girders, and I saw a documentary which labeled that the girders that melted were in the middle which made te building fall straight down, not slide.

Gobblemaster
{Ed001's Note - that is simply not true, paper and wood burn hotter than fuel oil now do they? The documentary you saw was simply a lie, the girders that would have been hit on the plane's entry would have been the first to go. Their structure would have been weakened and twisted, they would have been first to go, if any. What you saw was a lie, not a documentary. Like I have said many times before, the building, including all girders in the structure, were designed to cope with this impact and fuel oil burning without collapsing. It would not be safe to have a tower that tall, in such a built up district, without numerous safety measures, such as being able to stand up to impact. That is why they require controlled demolition to bring them down.}
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
I'm sorry guys, I'm not trying to troll or anything, I just don't believe and do not see why the government would do this to there own people, really shocking what happened, I apologise if I come across as a troll

Gobblemaster
{Ed001's Note - there are many conspiracy theories about, most I don't believe in either, but this one definitely has something to it. The facts just don't add up to the story given out in the main stream media. I have no idea about 'black technology' or holograms etc, but I do know that the official story is utter nonsense. It doesn't even come close to reality, which is why I assumed you were trolling. I can understand people disputing, for instance, the shooting of JFK, or the events surrounding Diana's death in Paris. But this one is so well documented, that it is easy to check up things like how hot steel needs to get to melt and compare that to the heat that fuel oil burns at. It is also easy to check up building regulations in the city to see how all towers have to be designed to withstand the impact of a plane. It then becomes difficult to believe what we are told happened is really what did happen. Then you add that to information like the 1950s plan to fly a plane into a high building and blame it on the Communists in order to bring in greater powers for the US Govt to crack down on them. That plan is freely available to read, as it was released under their 'Freedom of Information' legislation. Then you factor in that the govt and its employees denied any such plan ever existed or that there had ever been any plans made should a plane be crashed into the towers. All of those things add up to one big lie, somewhere, someone, or some group, are lying about what happened that day. The only real questions are who, why and what really did happen? Oh and I apologise, I did think you were a troll, so my mistake, sorry.}
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not Registered
06 Oct 2013 15:27:17
Na mate, my mistake, I guess I was just being stupid, all your points make sense, but it's just so hard to believe, I'm 50/50 on this and will look up 9/11 in the search function, watch some videos if there are any, sorry about my. attitude lol and I will look out for some things

Cheers

Gobblemaster
{Ed001's Note - naivety is not the same as stupidity mate. It is difficult to believe that a government would do such a thing to its own people, unless you are a keen student of history. When you are, you see repeated instances of it happening over and over again. You also see how propaganda is used to present the view the victor wishes to present. For instance, Alexander is known as 'The Great' in the West, but in the East he is remembered for having villages put to the sword. In the West we are taught Genghis Khan was a mass murderer and inhuman killer, yet he was actually far easier on the area he conquered than his contemporaries in Western Europe. Even as recently as World War 2, we are told that Pearl Harbour was an unprovoked attack by the Japanese against the innocent USA. In fact, the USA had been deliberately picking at Japan for years, including the invasion and assimilation of Hawaii, just prior to their referendum, which was almost certain to vote for Hawaii to become a province of Japan. That is not to say Japan was innocent either, they were an aggressive empire, looking to conquer new lands, but America did everything they could to antagonise them into a direct conflict. Also, despite the story told, they knew the attack was coming, but never did anything to protect the base so that the resultant outrage would put the US public firmly behind a war (sound familiar?). Politicians lie to the public constantly, putting their own interests ahead of the people they are meant to represent, so it is not really a surprise that a government made up of politicians can not be trusted!}
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Read all 12 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create a new post

Log in or register to post.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.