Latest replies

Ask Mr Al Fayed, he claimed that they were the "gangsters that secretly run the country". At the time he said that, I thought he was just venting his anger in a controversial way, but years later when I learned that the only footage of Dodi & Di was outside the hotel because every single road traffic camera from the hotel to the tunnel had either popped a fuse or run out of film or had a malfunction I realised just how much power they have. The monarchy hasnt changed in principle it has just changed with the times as to what they say and do to put on a front, I think this is because some of their closest inner circle mob are the true powers behind media, the arms trade, and oil. The whole idea of a family being elite is disgusting, they have 2 arms and 2 legs like the rest of us and have never achieved their role as leaders they are just born into it and we dont have a choice.

Matt_RFC

It was made into it's current shape in the 1920's - look for the cement.

Ed frankly either you just enjoy winding people up or have a complete disregard for everything. Science does not constantly get it wrong and to say we no virtually nothing is ridiculous. Science is why I am able to type this on my iPad whilst watching tv. Why my mobile works and why I can fly around the world. It's how we have nuclear power stations and basically behind most things in our lives. Yes we learn more and theories change and evolve but look where we are now compared to a hundred, ten or even five years ago. As for no basis in fact, again that is simply not true. Aside from the basic laws of nature etc, low gravity can be duplicated in underwater or high altitude conditions. There are many mysteries in life but just because science can explain some of them does not mean science must be wrong. If you don't accept this then that's your decision but to just say no you are wrong because science is wrong is not a proper argument. {Ed001's Note - erm no, you are still missing the point, just because we know (notice the spelling, it is basic English, shouldn't be difficult to know the difference between know and no if you have a degree!) some things, doesn't mean we know a lot. We know very little, it is not difficult to understand that, if you really do have a degree I am sure your tutors would have stressed the point to you many many times. Low gravity can not be replicated under water! That is a high drag environment, high pressure, while low gravity is low drag and low pressure. High altitude experiments are still not ideal, the variance in gravitational pull is simply not enough to make for useful data. But of course you would know all that wouldn't you?}

Ed what is your problem? I was not disagreeing with you just pointing out the science behind their movement. If the posters on this board are so close minded and will not accept any other views then this is not a forum ( look up the meaning in the dictionary). My point was valid and put across with no view given on others comments, there is no reason for you to be so rude and if you don't agree with the science behind it, then please state why. I have no proof whether we have been to the moon and frankly couldnt care, however, a physics degree does provide a knowledge of how and why we would move in a low gravity environment should we go there. {Ed001's Note - because it was not an explanation but a complete repeat of the pseudo-science nonsense they used at the time. It was not your theory, it was simply repeating the lies told by the government with no basis in fact. By the way, having a physics degree means nothing, you wouldn't have any greater knowledge, that has been proven time and time again. That is why science constantly gets proven wrong and has to change its theories over time. We know virtually nothing about the world and even less about space and other worlds.}

It's problee the aliens,i mean look at the chick on the mature dating site out of this world..

red blancmonge

Here's the link, if anyone wants it.
.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article4347586.ece
I'm not the original poster btw.

In principal the astronauts could technically move faster but it's not as simple as that. It's not just a case of lower gravity, mass etc must mean they can move faster. You also have to counter in that our bodies are evolved to working in our own gravity environment and also that running fast involves traction and friction on the ground. These points would effect how the astronauts could move and so they would have to do so in leaps rather than running. The reason they didn't try and move fast was that moving around in that fashion would disorient them and they may lose their bearings and also if they fell over they could damage their suits. So yes they could move faster but in a different way that was not suited to their needs. {Ed001's Note - are you for real? Hahahaha, that is a class, and completely inept, attempt at coming up with an explanation.}

I do think isolated places like Antarctica or new mexico are more prone to incidents than populated places
I'd heard about a village in Alaska in which the entire population had disappeared, including the buried bodies of the dead from the cemetery. I don't think this is this is the same story though.
There was still food on the stoves being cooked and all the dogs had died of starvation. It's still unknown where all of these people went so quickly and unexpectedly.

As for the Nome case and the movie, I read an article where someone claimed that they researched the events and people in the movie and found no evidence that this is a true event. They said that there was no evidence of the Dr. either.
Not to say that it didn't happen because non believers will disregard any and all evidence in an effort to prove the non existence of UFOs and extraterrestrials.
frankyscouse

Looks like a weather balloon to me

Heres a link to that Rockerfeller report if anyone wants to see it. Cheers.

PmacC

www.ufo-blogger.com/2012/05/olympic-games-13000-people-will-be.html

The film "the thing" comes into mind, leaves me clueless what to make of it, dyou think ufo's/e.t's are more prone to isolated areas where population is low kinda like one of the poles that has restricted air space?

Jedimindtricks

I cant find anything about the Federal reserve charted expiring, some online say its true, some say there is no expiration date, no mention of either in wikipedia or their own website so Im still not sure. On the Olympic issue, if the Rokerfella's are involved it makes me think there is a chance, we all saw 911, I dont think I can be shocked anymore, I for one will be staying away from london just in case !

Matt_RFC

Oh right 9000 or 500 that would be more than an atrocitie that will be nigh on the end of the uk and what it stands for c'mon really,i do not believe for one minute it's for real.Conspiracy definetly maybe, i wait and wait..

red blancmonge

{Ed033's Note - Matt_RFC, this would be Ian R. Crane. He has talked about the Rockefeller report on fictional scenarios which will help implement global governance. In this Rockefeller report there is a fictional scenario where 13,000 people are killed in the 2012 London Olympics

I think most websites don't want to admit what we think it is in case they get riddle-cued ,makes you wonder how many more stuff like this is swept under the carpet,like i said it was by pure luck i found it.
frankyscouse

Matt i think i seen that,what the feller said thou was that in a document he read was that the usa security people who were drafted in by our government (hmm strange i know) that if there was a attack and a certain amount of deaths occurred,it might have been 500 i cant remember,anyways the security forces had the power to declare martial law in london.
frankyscouse

The link takes you to press Tv's site. It used to broadcast on sky but ofcom shut it down because of apparent admin issues ? It would take me a long time to explain what is happening but to put it simply its a bit like Lybia where the west goes out of its way to help /arm/fund/supply and protect the rebels so they can smash the country to bits whilst our lovely media do its best job to sift through images to make it look to western sheep like they are fighting a just cause and are just some kind of primative outfit with no shoes and potato guns.

Matt_RFC

I get your point cheers..

red blancmonge

What annoys me about this case is most websites you look into pass it off as nothing basically being completly ignorent i for a fact know theres more to this case than just an avalanche or they got cold and started taking there clothes of as a resut bollox i lean towards alien,supernatural acourence on this one too

Jedimindtricks

Red Blancmonge,

I am not saying the atrocious attacks were not real. My poiny is about the BBC falsely using an image from a mass grave in Iraq and saying it is a picture from an activist in Syria. I can't say how bad the Syrian government is because i've never been there. However, I am not going to blindly believe the propoganda that is spouted by America and UK, when i know they have an endgoal of having control of the area. Too many times during the Libyan conflict so called activists and people on the ground were proven to be making up sh**e on their Twitter accounts while based in Western countries. I don't believe everthing I see or read from our western governments just because they tell me it's true.

Cork Red Boi

Deffo freaked them out to run without any shoes in the snow,i just can not give you a reasonable explanation to what happened and no experts can, that's why i lean to the UFO/alien theory.
frankyscouse