Latest replies

Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 20:32
...have to admit I didn't mind Knowing, but I'm with the Ed., Nicholas Cage...how the hell did he become top draw?!

dmedly
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 18:59
Could the secret black hologram technology include giving one solidity, like Rimmer for example; what are we?......anyone, Icke?
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 18:56
AIDS was engineered by scientists in America
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 18:53
The film Knowing predicted the gulf of mexico oil distaster in the newscast (April 15th) at the beginning of the film and the prediction was only 5 days different from the real disaster on April 20th
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 18:51
I think I've watched training day 3 time in the last few weeks. Great film. Going of on a tangent a bit but have you seen "man on fire"? Denzel does seem to be mr reliable in films.

Supasub {Ed001's Note - I love that film, except for the fact the little girl in it reminds me too much of mine at that age. Denzel is a top actor, I certainly can't think of a better one off the top of my head. He is outstanding in John Q as well.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 18:37
Sorry, meant to be "reply to post" in a rather flimsy support of Nicholas Cage in response to Ed001.

Supasub {Ed001's Note - no worries mate, I would say it was very very flimsy, but I wasn't a fan of it. I quite like Sorceror's Apprentice that has him in it, it was a decent film to watch with my daughter. But I still think he is abysmal as an actor and films tend to be good in spite of him, rather than him being able to carry a film, like say Denzel Washington in Training Day.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 18:06
Can you post pic on ere ed?

{Ed033's Note - Click on the below image to see the full size image of sumerian kings and annunaki? wearing wrist devices

sumerian wrist watch

Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 17:31
I watched some crap on Discovery channel that supported the official events and set out to debunk the various facets of the conspiracy.

A team of experts with their computer simulation of the Pentagon attack made some prerquesites and suppositions and removed the engines from the model. As the plane moves through the sequence it impacts the wall, wings go through the outer skin massively damaged then disintergrate as they get smashed up by all the supporting steel columns. What remains as the sequence continues is what can only be described as a missile, and their simulation proved it...mental!

Paragon
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 16:56
I disagree about alex jones being crazy,the guy puts it out there in the corrupt usa media,i admire the guy.
frankyscouse
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 16:56
I cant work out Alex Jones, Its a bit like watching David Icke or someone, you cant just say you beleive everything someone says or completely disagree, its more about what portion of what they are saying do you beleive. When Im watching SKY or BBC news I beleive about 10% (mainly just the times and locations of stories not actual content) and I beleive Alex more than that, but some of the stuff he talks about (chemtrails, FEMA camps) is in my opinion wide of the mark. Having a daily show about truth means he does fill it with some rubbish. On some stuff I do agree with him that a certain event may be a conspiricy (911) I have different views than him on the actuall theory though and who or what may have caused it and for what reason. I like Max Keiser, now the stuff he talks about is real, ie the financial world is run by a crew of gangsters who call themselfs bankers, traders, analysts, investors, concressmen, presidents, prime ministers and so called royalty.

Matt_RFC
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 15:56
Arron russo is a credible guy ...its just a shame it had to be alex jones he was talking to because everyone thinks he's a crazy conspiracy theorist.
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 15:56
I find it weird that ive updated wikipedia with joke info about stupid celebs and stuff before and its taken nearly 24 hours to be removed .....this info was taken down in 6 minutes .......weird! you decide
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 15:56
I agree matt i seen the interveiw last year and we can never be certin but the guy seemed genuine.
frankyscouse
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 15:56
Are you lot for real and what about the thousands of people on the ground who witnessed the attack. I suppose the men in black swooped in and erased all their memorys and fed them a bull s**t story. Get real!

{Ed033's Note - You have to look at the evidence first before making assumptions. According to Andrew Johnson's research in the below interview (see 3 links below), most people were not looking up and only knew about any planes after they were told it was planes by the news.

Andrew Johnson 2nd interview on Richplanet.net
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=10&part=1
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=10&part=2
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=10&part=3

I think the missiles that hit the world trade centers were travelling at about 250 mph and could have looked like small planes at the speed they were travelling. The missiles may not have been fired from that far from the world trade centers.
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 15:56
I watched the video underneath these posts where it is very clear that the News placed a digital generic plane and actually if you watch the footage they got the digital parameters all wrong its actually hilarious.

Funny how at the pentagon took away any footage from any CCTV in the surrounding areas.And then even funnier they totally got the plane parts wrong that they scatttered all over the place well I say parts they left an engine and a wing that was all that was left from an ENTIRE plane that crashes into a building.

Even the hole it left was up for debate it was exactly circular yet a where did the wings go.
Ed do you know anything more about this cant remember the name of the expose film I watched but it completely debunked everything successsfully.

Red tinted glasses
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 09:52
I have seen the interview, its called warnings and reflections. Obviousley its just his word and sceptics would say hes gone barking mad or something but I think its genuine he comes accress sincere.
Matt_RFC

Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 06:38
After he came out of prison he was a completely different person and the media doesnt want people to know (Dean)
------------------------------------
Pac was never in Prison. Jail and Prison are 2 very different places. This illusion of Pac being a street tough gangster or an outspoken visionary on the state of affairs is laughable. He was a theatre kid who was flamboyant and boisterous and was able to convince Suburban Americans that he was something more. Trust me bro, I was an American teen in the early 90's, fun times, but very grandised now.
BUCK
Read discussion
Reply · · 19 Apr 2012 00:04
Ed001 - if you liked the film, you should read the graphic novel. Alan Moore is an amazing writer & the message is so much clearer.

an american red {Ed001's Note - I will give it a try if I ever get the chance.}
Read discussion
Reply · · 18 Apr 2012 20:54
Had a look at the video of the UFO in Denbigh. 100%. What else could that be. Well found frankyscouse

Delboy
Read discussion
Reply · · 18 Apr 2012 20:52
Agree to disagree ed lol =)

JK92 {Ed001's Note - yep.}
Read discussion
Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.