Latest replies

Reply · Not Registered · 10 Nov 2014 20:43
10 Nov 2014 20:39:16
Franky why not?

We know there's gaps in the biological record regards the jump from ape to man.

We know there's gaps in the archaeological record.

It would explain the face 'modern civilization' has only been around 8-10000 years but 'modern man' is much older based on the fossil record.

It could explain all the ancient mythologies of visiting gods etc in practically every culture around not to mention the array of monuments.

Mort
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 10 Nov 2014 12:38
10 Nov 2014 13:27:02
Its not police state yet but it is growing.

Their now encouraging you to spy on your neighbours, trying to control how you think.

Next maybe restrictions on travel. Back home all internal flights and all trains between major cities had kgb agents who could interrogate you as to the purpose of your travel, this was after getting through various checks anyway. Travel was largely discouraged internally and externally was extremely hard.

The press is slowly moving towards the official line.

However if you want to see a proper police state take a trip to Russia.

Kim Philby
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 10 Nov 2014 11:18
My question would be, how can one equate wishing one person ill and an indistinct part of society? One can witness and pass judgement on the behavior and actions of one person, and find it unfitting and perhaps worthy of punishment. But how does one do the same in regards to an unspecified section of society?

I am not saying society is full of neo-nazis. What I'm saying is that the establishment benefits from vague discrimination as it can be used by them to justify "dealing" with a 1/3 of a population, before anyone realizes the situation has gone too far.

Commies, hippies, anarchists, terrorists, neo-nazis, jihadists etc. Some people have been so brainwashed through the establishment's use of labels and stereotypes to support the establishment's "order" campaign.
zari
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 10 Nov 2014 11:05
My question would be, how can one equate wishing one person ill and an indistinct part of society? One can witness and pass judgement on the behavior and actions of one person, and find it unfitting and perhaps worthy of punishment. But how does one do the same in regards to an unspecified section of society?

I am not saying society is full of neo-nazis. What I'm saying is that the establishment benefits from vague discrimination as it can be used by them to justify "dealing" with a 1/3 of a population, before anyone realizes the situation has gone too far.

Commies, hippies, anarchists, terrorists, neo-nazis, jihadists etc. Some people have been so brainwashed through the establishment's use of labels and stereotypes to support the establishment's "order" campaign.
zari
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 10 Nov 2014 10:04
So top masons do not want the general public to know that certain humanoids have always had knowledge? Illuminati?
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 10 Nov 2014 09:30
It would not surprise me the people or person who made that crazy law had skeletons in their cupboard, we know who the real powerful pedo rings are based and it is not based in any of those parks.
Read discussion
Reply · rank0 rank1 rank2 Ed033 · 10 Nov 2014 07:58
{Ed033's Note - Wayne Hershel shows Mars face & Cydonia features match stars on a star map and shows a special star that the top masons have been searching for.

Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 10 Nov 2014 02:19
The site?think you mean about 4 or 5 people so do not exaggerate, for the record I was one of them and I do not lose any sleep over it.

i do not see the parallel in you bringing thatcher into this topic unless you are related to her or you are the controlled response that edd was on about?

i was from the era of Thatcher and I seen what her policies did to families, the lies the cover ups and its come out recently she knew she had pedophiles in her cabinet, then we had her best mate jimmy saville, do you want me to go on?

freedom of speech which this topic was based on means exactly what I have typed about her and for now its legal, maybe you want censorship?
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 09 Nov 2014 18:59
Sorry - can I Just pick up on something. You say there is a case for controlled response or something along those lines - well do you care to tell me what was so controlled about people on this site expressing delight at death of Thatcher? What was controlled about that? I remember this site was crawling with such messages!

Jcat
Read discussion
Reply · HERBIE · 09 Nov 2014 17:05
The people's voice is been stifled, the police state is here and its only going to get worse.
Freedom of speach your having a laugh.
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 09 Nov 2014 13:59
Divided we fall, united we stand. Fight for everyone's inherent right of expression. The label applied to them by the establishment or whether you share their opinion is irrelevant. We are all human beings.

In regards to the abductions of people by uniformed persons, these are despicable acts that warrant the condemnation of all of humanity. People should recognize that labels change over time, the establishment's actions, reasons and end goals however, remain the same and are repeatedly attempted.

Also, I agree with Franky's, Ed033's and Ed001's comments. As always that which provides the excuse needed by the establishment to initiate the next phase of their plans is created, trained, funded, equipped and controlled by the establishment.
Anyone here analyzed the phrase "Big Brother", specifically which areas of one's conditioning it attempts to manipulate, in what way and to what end?
zari
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 09 Nov 2014 12:26
09 Nov 2014 13:23:54
Free speech went years ago, you can't criticise any ethnic or religious group, whether its jewish, muslim, anyone without the race card being played, the anti semite card, the islamophobe card. The debate on immigration in this country was stifled on the racism card.

1984 is here but they were smart enough to not be as overt.
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 09 Nov 2014 11:43
It seems it was a anti Semitic tweet to miss berger that got him jailed 'You can always trust a Jew to show their true colours eventually. '

whether this person is a paid agent or more prob a person the question has to be asked is it right to be jailed for your own views?is freedom of speech gone? if that's the case then sites like this will be monitored (i think it is already) then ten years down the line we will all be warned and possibly arrested over posts.
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 09 Nov 2014 10:51
I agree on neo nazi stuff but all this anti Semitic stuff only really seems to get mentioned when genuine people like myself question my local mp party on subjects like gaza, I think the term is flame thread, where someone will ask a serious question then you seem to get all of these neo nazis groups crop up out of the woodwork then the question gets lost and cast to one side, as a former judge tweeted to me that " fellow-Zionist, John Mann, is pushing for those with anti-Zionist views etc to be banned from using the Internet".

me personally think these neo nazi groups are staged and paid for to recruit persons and use them when needed.
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 09 Nov 2014 10:21
I've heard of pcp having a similar affect, just google pcp stories, that's some messed up reading,
Read discussion
Reply · Not Registered · 09 Nov 2014 10:01
09 Nov 2014 10:58:33
There's a difference between expressing your concerns to your 'democratically' elected representatives and sending vile filth. If they are neo nazis then that's good they've been arrested, I despise neo nazis.
Read discussion
Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.