Yes Ryan it was me. Thanks for that mate I'll get a watch of it soon as. Cheers
Read discussionLatest replies
Who are the 'masters' that the U. S. President reports to, Security Services, Bankers, National Critical Service organisations (fuel, electricity etc) or a combination of all of them? Which individual is top of the tree? And if this is the case for the U. S. President, what about 'leaders' of other county's across the world?
Read discussionThere is a movie that presents reality as being a simulated universe by the title: "The Thirteenth Floor" that came out in 1999.
Research money is being made available to mainstream science in return for it proving that the initial spark that gave rise to the universe was a random event. By identifying the equations of natural mechanisms ("laws of physics") one can trace the source that powers said mechanisms, the means through which they affect the universe and how they trigger sequential mechanisms. In doing so one begins to notice the evident patterns of the universe or of those mechanisms that give rise to the universe.
Infinity is a concept forever alien to a finite mind. For by merely perceiving one of its infinite aspects, that which is limited is rendered limitless, that which is captive becomes free.
This is the reason for the establishment's funding and promotion of nullifying concepts and nihilist scientists. In this way all variables in said equations are quantified and subsequently turned into stupidly labelled, conditional constants. Through their subsequent differentiation those constants become zero and zero can only be defined in relation to infinity.
As such, one enters a vicious circle.
The reason the above is mentioned is to prehensile that the argument between a simulated universe and an unpredictable one is that of order and chaos.
In quantifying variables, one brings conditional order to an equation. On the contrary, through transcendental numbers (hyper-dimensional variables) one witnesses infinity.
I believe the universe and all that it contains can be explained through mathematics. By identifying the equations of all perceivable natural mechanisms and setting them in the appropriate sequence (microcosmmacrocosm) in a power matrix (see math for "power" and computer programming for "matrix"), would produce a software program that would simulate/emulate the universe.
Of course for this to be possible one would need a relatively infinite power source and a frequency differential of about 10^64.
There is a theory that states that, when one perceives every variable in the universe, another manifests and thus the universe rearranges itself into something new, thus requiring recalculation.
Admittedly, this notion could be used to support the theory that the universe is a relatively perpetual simulation machine, but could also be taken to infer that the universe is a consciousness that perpetually promotes the evolution of consciousness.
In conclusion, I think the question that should be asked is not whether the universe is a computer simulation or not, but whether mathematics are the language of the universe and thus computers have been modeled according to the currently perceivable universe.
zari
Read discussionResearch money is being made available to mainstream science in return for it proving that the initial spark that gave rise to the universe was a random event. By identifying the equations of natural mechanisms ("laws of physics") one can trace the source that powers said mechanisms, the means through which they affect the universe and how they trigger sequential mechanisms. In doing so one begins to notice the evident patterns of the universe or of those mechanisms that give rise to the universe.
Infinity is a concept forever alien to a finite mind. For by merely perceiving one of its infinite aspects, that which is limited is rendered limitless, that which is captive becomes free.
This is the reason for the establishment's funding and promotion of nullifying concepts and nihilist scientists. In this way all variables in said equations are quantified and subsequently turned into stupidly labelled, conditional constants. Through their subsequent differentiation those constants become zero and zero can only be defined in relation to infinity.
As such, one enters a vicious circle.
The reason the above is mentioned is to prehensile that the argument between a simulated universe and an unpredictable one is that of order and chaos.
In quantifying variables, one brings conditional order to an equation. On the contrary, through transcendental numbers (hyper-dimensional variables) one witnesses infinity.
I believe the universe and all that it contains can be explained through mathematics. By identifying the equations of all perceivable natural mechanisms and setting them in the appropriate sequence (microcosmmacrocosm) in a power matrix (see math for "power" and computer programming for "matrix"), would produce a software program that would simulate/emulate the universe.
Of course for this to be possible one would need a relatively infinite power source and a frequency differential of about 10^64.
There is a theory that states that, when one perceives every variable in the universe, another manifests and thus the universe rearranges itself into something new, thus requiring recalculation.
Admittedly, this notion could be used to support the theory that the universe is a relatively perpetual simulation machine, but could also be taken to infer that the universe is a consciousness that perpetually promotes the evolution of consciousness.
In conclusion, I think the question that should be asked is not whether the universe is a computer simulation or not, but whether mathematics are the language of the universe and thus computers have been modeled according to the currently perceivable universe.
zari
http://johnsonbushandnixonkilljohnfkennedy.blogspot.co.uk/
This is a good read that tells you just about everything you need to know abut JFK and the assassination.
Read discussionThis is a good read that tells you just about everything you need to know abut JFK and the assassination.
Like the holo-deck on Star Trek
Read discussionNo idea Franky, I can't see it.
:-)
Read discussion:-)
Haha herbie that homer joke had me laughing, I am out for a few drinks tonight and will try to catch over the weekend, is this simulation like a kind of matix that we can not see?
Read discussionAll presidents need to answer to the higher order, JFK unfortunately did not fit into that agenda.
I believe he would still have been taken out.
Read discussionI believe he would still have been taken out.
Cheers Herbie for that. I wonder, where /whom he was getting the information from to expose the plot? Obviously, being the President at the time, he would have has access to a wealth of information. However, I wonder whether he had access to information on most 'black project's'?
Also, I wonder, if he didn't say those words in public and kept quiet until he was live on air to expose the details, would he still have been assassinated?
Read discussionAlso, I wonder, if he didn't say those words in public and kept quiet until he was live on air to expose the details, would he still have been assassinated?
7 days before his assassination this is what he said.
"There’s a plot in this country to enslave every man, woman, and child. Before I leave this high and noble office, I intend to expose this plot"
He knew to much.
Read discussion"There’s a plot in this country to enslave every man, woman, and child. Before I leave this high and noble office, I intend to expose this plot"
He knew to much.
Listened to the first one, will get the rest later.
Still not convinced by this but as always will give it a chance and keep an open mind but this all seems just a little to crazy for me. I'm not a quantum physics type of guy and admittingly when I listen to things like that I turn into a Homer Simpson.
Read discussionStill not convinced by this but as always will give it a chance and keep an open mind but this all seems just a little to crazy for me. I'm not a quantum physics type of guy and admittingly when I listen to things like that I turn into a Homer Simpson.
Regarding JFK, I just wanted to ask, as i've read and heard in quite a few places (sorry if this sounds silly), that he was going to go public on a number items, including the existence of UFO's and ExtraTerrestrial beings. How true was this?
Read discussion07 Nov 2014 17:18:53
Not sure how someone can disagree with fact.
Read discussionNot sure how someone can disagree with fact.
Forgotten conspiracies
Whatever happened to the cold war Conspiracy Theories like K-129/USS scopion or the shooting down of KAL007.
Read discussionWhatever happened to the cold war Conspiracy Theories like K-129/USS scopion or the shooting down of KAL007.
I don't think it would be any safer if JFK was'nt assassinated, the agenda would of carried on regardless.
The US president does not and never will have the power to change things, he is merely a puppet to his masters.
Read discussionThe US president does not and never will have the power to change things, he is merely a puppet to his masters.
There are a few from the United page that come on here now and probably others who you don't know about because they don't post.
Read discussionYeah true, pity your football rumor followers can not see it.
Read discussionAlways thought of you as a skeptic edd002 about most of the stuff written on here but clearly from your last comment you can see there is a agenda.
Read discussionGreat points zari thanks.
Read discussionA sad/funny and imaginative link mort, it sort of needs to be asked this question and I want all the edds 001/002/007 and edd 033 and followers to this site to answer this.
would the world be a safer place today if jfk never got assassinated?
Read discussionwould the world be a safer place today if jfk never got assassinated?