Latest replies

Very very intriguing! my new research project. Cheers guys

That wasn't an explanation. i'm intrigued. spill the beans

I'm with pea on this one. Did you know the queen mother's nickname was cookie? And more importantly did you know why?

Ryan.

I think it is, she was not pregnant, the baby could have been adopted plus add in to the mix one of the physicians was dating jill dando before she got shot and killed before she was supposedly going to expose a pedo ring with royal conections, to be honest nothing has convinced me about km pregnancy but if this was prince Edward fathering a child I would say their is more chance of louie spence being the dad than him.

Thank you so much Ed033 for taking the time to reply and to point me in the right direction.
Zari

Hey Ed033, could you share some more info on their religion?
Zari

17 Sep 2013 12:52:19
Not an answer to your intriguing question, but in a similar vein, I get the same impression of Kate Middleton's 'pregnancy'; its like they are taking the pi$$. Often i've heard the question asked "do they think we are stupid?" and well I think you should know the answer to that question by now. pea

Exactly Ed001. The people setting the rules and those enforcing them are not bound by the rules, except for when cosmetic purposes require it. Right now the USA is playing global enforcer.
Whoever follows, and someone always does, will pick up exactly where they leave off.
Zari

Hey Mort. A Union of South American Nations and an African Union are already in existence. There are also proposals in place for a Central Asian Union and a South Asia Union.
You might also want to look up NAFTA, which is a free trade agreement signed between USA, Canada and Mexico. The DEA are already active in Mexico which means that further agreements already exist between North American nations.
It doesn't really matter what name you give it or if you don't label it at all, the world is already split into "Unions". Only thing missing to formalize things are common currencies.
Zari

One thing I have noticed that is happening a lot more is the disinformation being put out there its getting harder to separate the wheat from the chaff, early on you had many debunkers whose arguments were laughable on subjects like 911 77 jfk etc and since that tactic was failing miserably and it pondered more questions than answers their has been a steady increase of rubbish put out there to steer you away from the real truth, all the events that has happened in say the last fifty years prove to me one thing above all, never ever trust what authority is telling you and as Chris carter famously wrote "trust no one "

Its possible that whoever wrote the script may have sent it to two studios who then put it into production, then realised too late they had the same film but went ahead with it hoping one was better than the other.

Im down with the 911 "conspiracy" 100% as its clear to see that something major is amis, too many contradictions, evidence pointing to cgi and other tech, and we are being spoon fed an almost scripted plot it seems. a few things rattle my brain if anyone is keen to help? now in this vid it shows blatant cgi and vid editing, even with this mistake, it was on a very impressive scale and has infact fooled a lot of people. Though why didn't they think this through and use the same tech on the pentagon, i'm sure if they went to all the trouble and planning to achieve their goals they woulda covered all their bases. To me the pentagon was the biggest smoking gun in this with all the failures to "cover up" properly, and to set the scene, yet they seem to have deliberately been careless?

Yeah pea funny enough I watched it a few weeks ago and at first the movie is a sub plot that was secretly saying israel were the bad guys then typical Hollywood it made out israel were trying to help Arabs from the virus, it was all downhill from there.

16 Sep 2013 17:13:55
Ed correct me if i'm wrong but didn't Microsoft make a killing off the Millennium bug selling upgrade patches? Mort

16 Sep 2013 16:07:24
Trust rusts, OP.
The best sentence i've heard describing the events of 9/11 was that it was "an inside job for outside influences".
Vague as that may be, I feel it paints the most accurate picture of those atrocities. pea

16 Sep 2013 16:01:27
Thanks for amending that opening sentence, Zari.
Speaking of dark comedies, anyone seen 'World War Z'?
In it, 'we' were saved by Isreal and the W.H.O. pea

When the movie Armageddon came out there was another similar film called Deep Impact that was released at the same time. As it turns out, there was a NASA experiment taking place at that time going by the same name. The mission involved hitting a passing comet with a negatively charged craft and provided evidence for the electric universe theory.
I did try to find a connection at the time, as I do not believe in coincidences, but found nothing conclusive. The production studios of both films had interesting names but that is as far as I got.
Zari

16 Sep 2013 14:51:07
Interesting theory Zari. Question, why have they never created a united states of south America or pulled Canada into the USA proper as both are on the doorstep. Mort

Ok ed in fairness you do make a valid point. I was just playing devils advocate. its just that the more I start to question what is supposed to be the defacto truth I tend to find it doesn't stop. before you know it a feesable conspiriacy theory then gets deeper and deeper. the possibilities are endless. conception and misconception. information and misinformation. trust disintegrates and you start to question everything.

16 Sep 2013 13:37:38
Exactly Ed it would take the same sort of network that left their own commander in chief exposed in Dallas. Standing down defences etc takes only a few key people. Mort