Latest replies

I am sorry but watched the september clues films and there is nothing there apart from somebody trying to convince people that it was a hoax.

I have no doubt that the american government knew there was going to be an attack but if you think that no planes crashed into the towers you are seriously deluded.

Marky Mark

Maybe you're just being a bit tongue in cheek saying it was Osama Bin Laden, and if so fair enough.

But just in case you're genuinely curious about what really happened that day, watch September Clues & September Clues Addendum, by Simon Shack. They're both available online. They're probably the most comprehensive documentaries on the no plane theory available, along with the Judy Wood book and interviews.

Study the evidence. The 'no plane' theory sounds absurd at first, but if there were no planes in Shanksville, and at the Pentagon, it's not unreasonable to at least consider the evidence for no planes at the WTC 1 & 2.

According to Shack, there was a 17-second delay between the attacks and the screening of the footage, long enough for passenger planes to be inserted into the film. He reveals technical glitches in the footage of the jets hitting the towers.

Various shots from both the TV footage and alleged 'amateur cameramen' show United Airlines Flight 175
disappearing into the South structure like a ghost.

If you study the footage of the so called 2nd plane strike, you have to ask yourself how can an alleged plane hit a massive building and scythe straight through it and the nose cone comes out the other side of the building completely intact? Through 208 feet of steel and concrete and keep it's shape?

But if you want to believe it was Bin Laden, then you must believe that Satam Al Suqamis passport really survived a blast that melted a commercial jet and reduced a skyscraper to dust, and was miraculously found intact nearby. Maybe YOU could prove how that can happen?

You might also want to believe that it was mere coincidence that NORAD was running a drill of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and the Pentagon on the morning of 911.

You might also want to explain how WTC7 fell in 6. 9 seconds (virtually freefall speed) despite not being hit by an aircraft. Larry Silverstein (the recent buyer of the WTC) is on the record as saying 'we made the decision to pull tower 7'. So did they just stroll into tower 7 with explosives while all around them towers 1 & 2 were exploding? And then set the charges in a matter of hours, when demolition experts say this job take weeks?

Maybe you can also explain why the WTC complex was completely shut down for 3 days only three weeks before 911 allegedly to install internet cables?

Why not offer us some proof of your theory if you're so sure?

Ryan.

Your know someone from the pentagon jedi?as for a plane hitting the pentagon this myth could be easily nipped in the bud by a video/phone/camera by the public, thousands were took on the wtc when the missile hit but apart from one security camera which does not show a plane but a blurred missile, working in the highest security facility in the world what is your friend supposed to say?if he/she said it was not a plane?

Gobblemaster, how did you even find this site mate it seems you wouldn't dare question what the media tells you! Anyway I found the 'Loose Change' documentaries very interesting as well. There is so much proof out there it's frightening. I mean how the powers that be get away with such lies is beyond me despite the amount of evidence! I guess the fact they own and control the media who in turn control small minded people who can't think for themselves helps them get away from being caught! Love this site btw guys I'm always checking it out. Keep up the good work all contributors!

My friend was in the pentagon when it hit he was rushed outside and he picked up a bit of metal off the plane a plane definetly hit but I don't think one hit the towers

jedimindtricks

Sorry my main point though was the more I think about the film monsters inc the more it has a peadophile or even satanic undertone to it.
Apparently although maybe by coincidence the big clock above them when all the monsters walk out in a scene which I think is mimicking the Armageddon movie? (Not sure) the clock is reading 9:11. This film was made a little while befoe, someone just teasing us or just coincidence. Just added that as it all links in nicely with the anniversary a couple of days ago.

Think of Hollywood as propaganda spewing HQ, anyone working there is definitely on with the plan. It would be impossible to have all the symbolism injected into a movie post-production without anyone finding out about it.
Star Wars is filled with propaganda as much as any other Hollywood production, e. g. the republic fighting the good fight against peoples that wish to be sovereign. Sounds like NWO to me.
If you are searching for alternative conditioning for your children I would recommend animation from Studio Gibli. You get all the dazzling details that suck you in, bright colors and imaginative animations, but with a meaningful and thought provoking storyline.
In all honesty, I'm still at a loss as to what purpose the illuminati symbolism serves. They keep projecting the same symbols over and over. Have they discovered that some images affect cognitive thinking, are the symbols used for secret communication, maybe using particular symbols repeatedly opens a portal to Cthulus dimension? Anyone?
Zari

Yeah mate you see things in a different light and their is more questions than answers, who owns it Disneyland and everything?shareholders /corporation in other words no one knows, I am still trying to find out who gained from the global crash, anyways budd as long as you and family had a good time.

Personally I think royalty connections had a hand in his escape one way or another because nearly 40 years later there is no new lead, it seems he vanished from the face of the earth, friends in high places?

Funny, after reading about the t. v on this page one of the small ads has a cartoon person glued to a t. v with the caption 'its easy to let things slip during the holidays'. lol yeah now we know why.

Jdog

Well said Ryan, but you may find the other 3 say "whats 9/11?"

MrTrotskysGhost

I agree with Stubblebine's conclusion that an aircraft didn't hit the Pentagon, as I think most people do, but Kate claiming that he is able to prove it is irritating to say the least. I would love to see some proof, but he doesn't present any here.

12 years to the day and I bet if you asked 10 people in the street today how many towers fell on 911, at least 7 of them would say 2.

Ryan.

Defo a hoax/prank, c'mon a blue light on one side and a red on the other! and hovering by hundreds of people watching a game! Probably a remote control model or similar.

Vincent. (1st time post but love this site)

Cheers franky, hadn't heard about project beach before that. Poor David Kelly. That was never suicide.

Ryan.

09 Sep 2013 12:51:07
The student fish said, "What is this 'ocean' you speak of?". pea

Surely the cost to have an advert on television is relative to a) the potential number of viewers at any given time ie prime time b) The specific audience you wish to target and to certain channels they may be designed for ie kids channels etc and c) the amount of time per advert will last and for how often you wish it to be shown.
as for being in auto pilot whilst watching the tv, I don't doubt that watching television may alter your brains state but I don't believe that this is due necessarily to the actual technology intentionally being designed to do this. logically peoplein general watch a tv to relax. its a passive pastime if you like. you sit, watch and listen while the information is fed to you so you don't have to think about it. if you watch a film you become engrossed in it but all the details are being fed to you. if you read a book you have to imagine the scenes, you build a world in your head. I play a lot of video games, it requires a tv (sorry to sound condescending!) but even though the sounds and images are still fed to me I need to think, to react. to a degree its not like watching a movie or tv show. i'd argue you can't play call of duty or fifa on auto pilot. just a thought, maybe i'm playing devils advocate but I just don't go for the ides that tv is used to control you in this way. sure news and certain tv shows use propoganda to sub conciously control people but not th tv itself. RedLeigh75

I think any kind of hush money would be to risky, I think they were murdered one way or another, how is anyone's guess.

08 Sep 2013 15:59:24
To be honest most of the time there's hardly anything on, its wall to wall reality s****, cooking shows or crap fly on the wall documentaries exploiting other peoples misery. This week sees the return of x factor, a quest by nobodies to become famous, and then we have the auditionees themselves. I watch the football, I like a good drama or police show or thriller, I usually watch films or a star trek dvd. I like gardening shows. Soaps I avoid. Mort

08 Sep 2013 16:11:48
Bear with me on this. In one of my favourite books the stand by Stephen King a group of characters have a discussion on the supernatural including work done by a professor into plane and rail accidents with the conclusion that full planes and trains rarely crash as some peoples sixth sense kicks in and they avoid the flight. I'll look it up later. Secondly in the TV show Sherlock, Mycroft Holmes tries to foil a terrorist plot by filling an airliner with people who had already died from natural causes. He called it his solution to the Coventry conundrum, plane still would be destroyed, terrorists get their victory and spies i'd was protected. Could something similar have happened here? Is this why families didn't claim compo? They knew how their relation really died and it wasn't on that plane, and they already had hush money? Or do I have an over active imagination? Mort

John Lear project Camelot interview touches on the hologram theory

Bernside