Ed033’s profile

03 Mar 2020 02:14:00
Cheers for that 33, gold, and that is exactly how they work. That clip ought to flick a switch in at least a handful of people, surely? Time to wake up?

03 Mar 2020 08:12:30
What if these 'clues' are left deliberately 'in plain sight' because we are meant to find them? Designed for those with an open, inquisitive mind to notice and to see through the false reality we have been provided with?

An aid to the spiritual evolution of mankind, you might say.

Imagine there were a hidden force that had been leaving such 'clues' for us throughout our known (manipulated) history. From the codified knowledge in the design of pyramids and ancient temples, to the deeper meaning hidden beneath the surface of ancient scriptures, to the 'predictive programming' we see around us today.

I've not posted for a long while but I'd like to thank Ed033 and SM and others as I've been reading the site recently and they've helped in my personal spiritual evolution more than they will ever know.

Good work folks.

01 Mar 2020 22:36:07
Spot on rian.

01 Mar 2020 09:31:42
Most people can't look at the evidence because if they do and realise the moon landings were faked, then they will inevitably have to ask what else have we been lied to about?

Ask people why did Neil Armstrong hide in an office in Cincinatti University for 7 years after he 'came back'?

He was the most famous man in the world.

The answer is because he was a decent guy and he was ashamed of taking part in The biggest lie of the 20th century.

29 Feb 2020 18:48:59
only a short clip so watch the whole thing.

At 2m8s was the part I was referencing earlier.

Astronauts on wires:

29 Feb 2020 19:44:22
Good vid ed33,
And I've never even thought about temperature swings tyre and batteries.
Lol rian and SM your right, the danger of the mission would give u a total different attitude towards the mission.
Think I seen a vid a few years back on here that showed stage lights falling to the floor.

And also someone pointed out how shadows of Astro not's where wrong .
Surely most must be questioning space agencies now!

29 Feb 2020 19:58:04
Only time I've seen stars in rockets fly is when they're cgi edited in.
You regularly see Sun and moon but never stars.

29 Feb 2020 18:00:13
Don't worry, Ed. They're in a nice warm studio.

Rian, I am not sure if they were posted on here, but there are videos showing Astronauts floating back to there feet after falling over. (Basically them struggling with the wire harness, or it was the harness operators first day. ) .

You have to remember though, that these are the best of the best and they don't need to concentrate or care about what they are doing. Much like the lunar launch on Apollo 15 when all they are worried about is playing some music on a tape player, to celebrate how great the US is. It's not like if one minuscule thing goes wrong, they are all dead hundreds of thousands of miles from Earth.

29 Feb 2020 16:23:02
it's ridiculous.

Something I've seen here and also on much so called lunar footage is that the astronauts frequently kneel down and not with any care.

If you were on the moon and even the tiniest breach of your suit could result in your death, there is no way you would be kneeling on a rocky surface.

Just for added value if you look at the way they move around, it looks a lot like they are trying to find the surface with their feet as opposed to bouncing up from it. exactly what you would do if you were on a wire.

28 Feb 2020 18:50:48
Was strange to find this as the first post, as I watched a different video on old maps, this morning. This lead me to Urbano Monte's map of 1587. Its width is 10 feet. It's in Italian but can be translated.

Urbano Monte map

"Monte made his map to serve not only as a geographical tool but also to show climate, customs, length of day, distances within regions - in other words, to create a universal scientific planisphere. "

The question with the OP video is, why make a map with Islands and towns if they are not actually there?

Do you happen to know the context of this map, as in why it was made and who commissioned it? .

From thinking across topics like chronology changes, hidden past etc. It does seem to point to some big changes in the I600s. And isn't this the time that the printing press became a thing? . I'll have to check but sure the first printed book was the 'Gutenberg Bible'. Thought that is probably debatable.

27 Feb 2020 12:13:12
Soz SM just see message

I've been looking into flat earth theory for years but never gone full in till late.

26 Feb 2020 08:17:07
I'm not saying I know that this is for sure the real deal but it's not obvious to me that its a model. Being an unfamiliar shape, a one off machine, and the only other examples most of us see being actual models, I can see why that connection might be made but I've got to ask, if it is genuine footage of the ISS, how would you expect it to look? How would it differ from what we see here?

Silly question maybe but related and I'm sure some of you clever dudes can explain it to me. Why don't I see any stars in this video, I would have thought being above the light pollution of the Earth, I'd see billions up there?

25 Feb 2020 23:05:39
Explain how it isn't hsf.

It's so fake it's hilarious.

25 Feb 2020 14:46:33
Here is the full video:

25 Feb 2020 14:29:30
Explain how this is a clear model?

24 Feb 2020 21:49:20
Sorry for what, Southampton? .

In seeking the truth, I haven't found the answers. It's just made me see the lies.

24 Feb 2020 23:25:25
That's it ed33.

24 Feb 2020 20:07:14
Agree Ed gravity must be cleaver because like others have said.
It knows the difference between air and helium in a ballon lol.
Also when u thought ahh I just dropped the remote,
It actually got pull out of your hand.
And if u ever want to go sky diving u will be pull to earth not fall .

I do agree atmosphere next to vacuum is near impossible.
But I'm still sat on a painfull fence sorry SM and ed.

24 Feb 2020 19:17:02
Haha, subjective gravity. Don't give 'them' ideas, Ed.

The Michelson-Morley experiment explanation is a joke.

Actually, the same person I spoke to about the vacuum / pressurised atmosphere, I explained the M-M experiment to them. They looked perplexed. Not from the fact they didn't understand what I had explained. More the fact they couldn't compute what the experiment concludes because it goes against their programming.

It's frustrating not being able to talk to intellectuals that are boxed in by MSBS thought.

But it's great when you see you have got through to them, on some level.

24 Feb 2020 17:20:56
I really can not get my head around how a pressurised atmosphere and a vacuum can sit side by side with no barrier separating them. It just wouldn't work.

I have had discussions where people argue that the air thins and gradually turns to a vacuum, all held in place by gravity.

If gravity was holding the air in place, how is it we get different layers of clouds moving in different direction?