TheBlueman8’s profile

20 Oct 2016 16:35:01
More from his fiance, not wife about this today claiming he was close to unmasking a black magic cult throughout Europe.

19 Oct 2016 18:59:54
Read a few comments from his wife and mam yesterday; they're claiming satanists trying to 'cleanse' him.

17 Oct 2016 15:03:51
sounds like someone has had him killed because he was getting to close to something. He even text his mum to say that if anything happened to him 'investigate' a few days beforehe was killed.

14 Oct 2016 17:27:01
yes definitely a strange thing to think its flat and not a sphere/ globe
the experiment you talk about ed033 still makes me think its all a simulation.

also the theory the north pole has a huge hole in it as well does lead to the hollow earth theory. the 2am internet searches has fried my brain.

14 Oct 2016 09:21:48
Yes Antarctica goes on indefinitely by all accounts, and my favourite, "Gravity as a theory is False. Objects simply fall". It's comedy gold.

14 Oct 2016 01:53:16
Stars are just like holes in a tent roof is a particular favourite, Rian lol
I'm quite open to all sorts of nonsense I readdon the internet at 2 o'clock in the morning but the flat earth stuff is miles out.
Don't they say that Antartica is the outer edge of earth but that the flat earth goes on indefinitely?
I look on things like the flat earth stuff as a distraction allowed to snowball to get people looking away from real issues and problems. And that's from someone that believes in Heaven and Hell. :-D.

13 Oct 2016 22:20:40
It's great fun reading the FAQ's on the flat earth society website. They're completely bonkers, but I love them anyway.

13 Oct 2016 16:49:00
There's a direct flight from Santiago in Chile to Sydney in Australia that takes just under 13 hours. On a flat earth these are two cities are on opposite sides on the disc approximately 28,000km apart (compared to to 11,300km on a globe) . For that flight to be possible on a flat earth the plane would have to fly far further than the published range of any commercial aircraft and reach speeds close to Mach 2, its route would also take it close to the North Pole instead of across the South Pacific. You can be pretty confident the world's not flat.

13 Oct 2016 15:40:08
yea i'm thinking more that way tbh, but its intriguing to think that there is a theory of a flat earth or how it would be possible.

09 Aug 2016 11:11:42
As I said French arrogance, bad weather and good tactics from the English including the terrain.

08 Aug 2016 22:04:20
What did the French in at Agincourt was their arrogance, coupled with the fact that the French knights were on horse back in the main, they thought they were invincible, most of the English knights fought on foot, as they weren't as wealthy as their French counterparts, the French never took into account the heavy ground they were riding into' and once the longbow men got to work it was game over

the French had no where to run to at the front were dealt with quickly and the pressing knights who couldn't see what was happening kept piling in, it was a killing zone which was well chosen by the english, the English foot knights and Sargent at arm's made light work of the heavily armoured French who were unable to truly fight while dismounted in such heavy ground.

08 Aug 2016 10:28:36
So who has the best military in your opinion Kim? And why if you don't mind me asking.

06 Aug 2016 16:42:36
Yes but a combination of French arrogance, bad weather conditions and good use of tactical topography by the English results in the victory at Agincourt.

I'm not saying you couldn't win a war against China. But it would be very difficult.

In the mid 1960s Khrushchev thought about attacking China and decided against it after weighing up the advice of the Marshals. Many of whom had won the war against the Germans.

Forces with numerical inferiority often win because of technical superiority. Like Agincourt or your colonial wars in Africa and India. Today the technological gap is greatly reduced.

06 Aug 2016 15:18:04
"With a population of 1.2 billion China has the worlds largest army and air force. You'd be fighting against overwhelming odds"

Kim, I know history is written by the winners, but didn't Henry V go over to France with 7,000 men and defeat an army of 35,000+ Frenchman?

06 Aug 2016 09:42:56
No. I'd say the Russian forces are currently the second strongest in the world. Putin has invested heavily after the neglect of the buffoons years.

But you'd be crazy to take on China for several reasons.

Lets assume a conventional war as nuclear weapons are understood by all as the last resort not the opener.

1. Geography. Russia shares a lengthy border with China. Easier to invade on a broad front with air support. America lacks nearby bases. Air support could operate from Taiwan, Japan and South Korea but where's the nearby land base? For Iraq they used Saudi Arabia.

2.Numbers. With a population of 1.2 billion China has the worlds largest army and air force. You'd be fighting against overwhelming odds. I read a book a few years ago on your involvement in the Korean war. The battle of the Imjin River aka Gloucester Hill. The quote goes something like this "we worked out that if you made the entire population of China walk past a post the line would never end due to new people being born".

3. The Chinese, like Russia, have spent heavily on the military over the last decade. They've been developing their own kit rather than just copying old Russian equipment. The Americans would be in for a far harder fight than Iraq 13 years ago.

4. Appetite. The ordinary American is sick of war. Its a hard sell these even for one with a cause like post 911. Manufacturing a reason to attack China? can't see many buying it. Also there would be a lack of allies. Britain for example post brexit isn't going to throw trade away. South Korea would be occupied with the North which surely would take the opportunity to attack with the Americans busy. Japan has no real military. The rest of Europe would stay out. Isis is a threat. China isn't.

Lastly given the large Chinese communities around the world in places like London, New York and Los Angeles just how many do you think would be sympathisers at least or sleepers at most. Even 5% would be enough to cause huge disruption.

What was Napoleons quote on China? Let her sleep for when she awakes the world will tremble?

05 Aug 2016 23:48:35
Well said hp, I was going to say the same thing'concerning the 1st paragraph.

05 Aug 2016 23:53:37
Kim that comment, "no one is stupid enough to go to war with china", are you implying that you think they are more powerful than Russia militarily?

05 Aug 2016 20:29:15
That remains to be seen! however, I wonder whether he did actually say that, or perhaps it's been taken out of context to show him up as being 'erratic'.

Additionally, was watching Fox 'unbiased' news show that HC is up in the poles for being the favorite for the Whitehouse, following her DNC. Bounce.

05 Aug 2016 10:37:16
More to the point who would he want to use them against?

Britain and France are allies. As is Israel. India and Pakistan are an irrelevance in US foreign policy as far as military matters are concerned. Trump isn't as anti Russian as Hilary. North Korea can't get it to work. Iran doesn't have them yet. And no one is stupid enough to go to war with China.

So who does he intend to use them on?

04 Aug 2016 21:21:13
He's a puppet just like all the rest, but I'm going to guess this bloke is being handled by different "puppeteers" he's rattled too many cages to be part of the current PTBs gang.
Could this be the beginning of a huge fracture in the game that's been played out now for decades.