21 Dec 2021
New image uploaded to the
Conspiracy Talk Sightings page entitled, Delta + Omicron Islands in Antarctica
Click picture for larger image
Ed033’s profile
Ed033
Published posts and replies
20 Dec 2021 13:33:32
Mushrooms On Mars...Again?
20 Dec 2021 23:06:30
Supasub, so now you're called, 'The Young Looking Conspiracy Dad'? :)
Read discussionSupasub, so now you're called, 'The Young Looking Conspiracy Dad'? :)
20 Dec 2021 20:58:41
I'm thinking there is no way you can play Russian Roulette more than half a dozen times without getting some kind of adverse event?
Read discussionI'm thinking there is no way you can play Russian Roulette more than half a dozen times without getting some kind of adverse event?
20 Dec 2021 19:38:30
What difference would it make if somehow they managed to jab everyone 3 times? It wouldn't make any difference because they would continue saying anything is still on the table regarding Lockdowns etc. and everyone needs to get the 4th Jab, and anyone who does not get 4 is classed as 'unvaxxinted'.
20 Dec 2021 19:13:23
Isn't an 'unvaxxinted' person, anyone who hasn't had 3 jabs and anyone where less than 14 days have elapsed after the 3rd jab?
Read discussionIsn't an 'unvaxxinted' person, anyone who hasn't had 3 jabs and anyone where less than 14 days have elapsed after the 3rd jab?
15 Dec 2021 18:10:50
CYCLORAMA - Virtual Reality in the 1800s
14 Dec 2021 15:26:46
An email from Richard D. Hall of Richplanet.net to his local M.P.
"Greetings,
Scientists have recently publiushed information about the nano technology
they have observed inside COVID vaccines. This is very disturbing.
I have written to my MP about this, and the information is summarised in
this email ...
Dear Gerald Jones (MP),
I have done a great deal of research into the injection programme and the
possible true reason for it.
It is clear that the injections do not do what the makers claim, ie protect
people from some imaginary virus.
Many scientists have now examined the contents of the vaccines under
powerful electron microscopes, and studies conclude that Graphine Oxide (or
Hydroxide) is present within the vaccines. Graphene Oxide is a man made
nano material and is toxic to the human body. It is undoubtledly one of the
main reasons for the 1.3 million UK adverse reactions. You can find details
of the adverse vaccine reactions from the governments own data here ...
https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports
Mutliple studies have shown that the vaccines contain nano technology (of
which graphene oxide is a building block) including damning evidence of
self-assembling wireless nanosensor networks using graphene quantum dots,
nanorouters and nanoantennas. These findings have recently been published
by Dr. Pablo Campra who found nano materials in 4 different makes of COVID
Vaccines.
Details of his study can be found here ...
https://everydayconcerned.net/2021/12/01/damning-evidence-of-self-assembling-wireless-nanosensor-networks-using-graphene-quantum-dots-nanorouters-nanoantennas-found-by-dr-pablo-campra-in-4-covid-vaccines-revealed-by-researcher-mik-anderso/
I am sending this email to formally inform you that evidence from respected
scientits shows that the injections are implanting innocent people, against
their wishes, with nano communication type technology, effectively
installing some kind of system into their bodies. The components of this
system are demonstrably toxic and are what has caused the reactions and
deaths people have so far suffered with and continue to suffer with.
I am making a formal request to you as my parliamentary representive to
express my concerns to the UK government, to the police and to the UK
parliament, and to highlight to them all the findings of Dr. Pablo Campra
and researcher Mik Anderson set out in the link above. The only sensible
action from now is to halt the vaccination programme and demand a criminal
investigation and prosecution into those who have been inovled in this most
heinous crime against humanity.
What is happening now in the UK (and the world) makes past genocide and
hollocausts throughout history look like childrens parties. Now that you
have been informed and shown the evidence, if you fail to act on this
request, you would be party to the ongoing genocide, and would hopefully
end up in prison.
You'll understand now why asking me to wear a mask, carry a covid pass or
lock myself in my house are the most insulting ridiculous things you could
expect anyone to do. Do not insult our intelligence buy supporting ANY of
these types of measures - millions of people now KNOW it is a global scam.
Were you elected to seek truth and repesent and protect your constituents ?
Or were you elected to role over and play your part in the rape and
genocide of your fellow humans ?
Please take action, please see what is going on. You have been monumentally
duped. My words are not conspiracy theories, what I am setting out is
backed by solid scientifically published evidence.
Act now.
Richard"
13 Dec 2021 21:13:10
What does the Lateral Flow Test, test for? Nobody knows do they?
Read discussionWhat does the Lateral Flow Test, test for? Nobody knows do they?
12 Dec 2021 10:21:12
House of Cards (Temporary or Not) - Jon Levi
11 Dec 2021 14:59:47
The Jig Is Up [titan sized trees] WISE UP
11 Dec 2021 12:54:47
i have posted about TV License before on here, but Ed032 raised it again recently.
If you don't watch TV then you might want to know the following:
They pretend there are only 2 options; either pay for the License or agree to their online agreement [where the main part of the agreement is you agree that any TV license rep. can search your place for any device capable of watching or recording TV transmissions and if they find such a device, you agree to pay up to £1000].
This is like if someone communicates with you and gives you the option of either go to a C.V. camp or pay 5000.
You don't agree to either. With T.V. license, you send them a piece of paper with something like the following on it:
I don't need a TV License and now i've told you i don't need a TV License, i'm removing any Implied Right of Access to any agents/representatives associated with TV Licensing. I will charge £5000 if any agents/representatives associated with TV Licensing trespass on my property known as [your address].
Also, if you write to me ro correspond with me in any way, anytime within the next 2 years, i will consider it harassment and charge £1000 each time you correspond with me.
They should write back to you agreeing with your terms. This way they agree with your terms instead of you agreeing with their terms under their aggressive threatening tactics.
11 Dec 2021 09:52:24
Paraguay seems to be the easiest and quickest to get a permanent residency visa other than Brazil.
Read discussionParaguay seems to be the easiest and quickest to get a permanent residency visa other than Brazil.
09 Dec 2021 13:21:37
SELLING THE VACCINE
url:bitchute.com/video/qNCE3c6ddRU7/
09 Dec 2021 08:43:44
This lady consents and therefore accepts the offer of going to a Camp. How about not consenting to any of their offers. At this stage in 'Common Law' Jurisdictions, they would then be left with sending an offer through the letter box, seeing if you accept their offer to give them money. You then fight this offer through writing back and forth with them.
Don't consent/agree/contract and then say i don't consent because you've already consented.
INSIDE AN AUSTRALIAN COVID INTERNMENT CAMP
url:bitchute.com/video/ZbEdLzX7wyHU/
09 Dec 2021 13:34:42
No, because it would take enough people to 'Wake Up' to the fact that we need to move away from the current controlled Satanic version of a society, to the previous version of a society. Dave Weiss is waking people up by showing we don't live on the outside of a moving Globe. Ewaranon, Jon Levi, Paul Cook, Martin Liedtke etc. are waking people up to the fictional timeline / fictional history / previous civilisation. This opens people up to moving back to the future of the previous society.
Read discussionNo, because it would take enough people to 'Wake Up' to the fact that we need to move away from the current controlled Satanic version of a society, to the previous version of a society. Dave Weiss is waking people up by showing we don't live on the outside of a moving Globe. Ewaranon, Jon Levi, Paul Cook, Martin Liedtke etc. are waking people up to the fictional timeline / fictional history / previous civilisation. This opens people up to moving back to the future of the previous society.
09 Dec 2021 13:42:30
For those that missed it on here before:
Vaccines in UK are not mandatory. There is an exemption on evidence of medical reasons and the Supreme Court recognises at common law that denial of free and informed consent is a self certified medical reason. See Montgomery v Lanarkshire [2015] UKSC 11
uksc-2013-0136 judgment
In R Wilkinson v Broadmoor : [2001] EWCA Civ 1545, Lady Justice Hale, Supreme Court President, confirmed that forced medical procedure without informed consent "may be sued in the ordinary way for the (common law) tort of battery".
bailii.org
In the judgement it was held that acting under statutory authority provides no defence, therefore the Employer will be guilty of coercion on the threat of battery with regards to unlawful dismissal if express evidence of denial of informed consent are unlawfully rejected.
This will result in a breach of contract and also a Tort that can be sued. The above is why mask "mandate" exemptions were self certified. It is unlawful for Doctors to interfere with the process of free and informed consent. Informed consent is defined in Montgomery as follows:
1. That the patient is given sufficient information – to allow individuals to make choices that will affect their health and well being on proper information.
2. Sufficient information means informing the patient of the availability of other treatments (and forms of testing).
3. That the patient is informed of the material risks of taking the medical intervention and the material risks of declining it.
If consent is given but the Patient subsequently proves that information provided at the time breached the above common law test of informed consent, the Tort of battery is committed and the medication is unlawful.
The High Court has found children incapable of providing Gillick Competency for experimental medicines with unknown long term effects. Schools therefore risk being sued for battery if ignoring Parental preferences. See Bell v Tavistock [2020] EWHC 3274
Bell-v-Tavistock Judgment
These principles are discussed without reference to case law on this important NHS page on Free and Informed Consent and Gillick Competency.
NHS Consent to treatment
The fundamental common law right to free and informed consent, based on the ancient Tort of battery (trespass to the person), are valid in all 16 Commonwealth Realms and both the Republic of Ireland and USA, where English common law is retained as a body of law.
In Ireland, evidence that English common law rights are retained can be found in the Statute Revision Act (2007) which retained Magna Carta and most of the English Bill of Rights (1688) and much, much more.
irishstatutebook.ie
In USA, English common law rights are retained by the 9th Amendment of the Constitution "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.", hence why US courts refer to them.
constitution.congress.gov
Read discussionFor those that missed it on here before:
Vaccines in UK are not mandatory. There is an exemption on evidence of medical reasons and the Supreme Court recognises at common law that denial of free and informed consent is a self certified medical reason. See Montgomery v Lanarkshire [2015] UKSC 11
uksc-2013-0136 judgment
In R Wilkinson v Broadmoor : [2001] EWCA Civ 1545, Lady Justice Hale, Supreme Court President, confirmed that forced medical procedure without informed consent "may be sued in the ordinary way for the (common law) tort of battery".
bailii.org
In the judgement it was held that acting under statutory authority provides no defence, therefore the Employer will be guilty of coercion on the threat of battery with regards to unlawful dismissal if express evidence of denial of informed consent are unlawfully rejected.
This will result in a breach of contract and also a Tort that can be sued. The above is why mask "mandate" exemptions were self certified. It is unlawful for Doctors to interfere with the process of free and informed consent. Informed consent is defined in Montgomery as follows:
1. That the patient is given sufficient information – to allow individuals to make choices that will affect their health and well being on proper information.
2. Sufficient information means informing the patient of the availability of other treatments (and forms of testing).
3. That the patient is informed of the material risks of taking the medical intervention and the material risks of declining it.
If consent is given but the Patient subsequently proves that information provided at the time breached the above common law test of informed consent, the Tort of battery is committed and the medication is unlawful.
The High Court has found children incapable of providing Gillick Competency for experimental medicines with unknown long term effects. Schools therefore risk being sued for battery if ignoring Parental preferences. See Bell v Tavistock [2020] EWHC 3274
Bell-v-Tavistock Judgment
These principles are discussed without reference to case law on this important NHS page on Free and Informed Consent and Gillick Competency.
NHS Consent to treatment
The fundamental common law right to free and informed consent, based on the ancient Tort of battery (trespass to the person), are valid in all 16 Commonwealth Realms and both the Republic of Ireland and USA, where English common law is retained as a body of law.
In Ireland, evidence that English common law rights are retained can be found in the Statute Revision Act (2007) which retained Magna Carta and most of the English Bill of Rights (1688) and much, much more.
irishstatutebook.ie
In USA, English common law rights are retained by the 9th Amendment of the Constitution "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.", hence why US courts refer to them.
constitution.congress.gov
09 Dec 2021 12:21:06
Right, but perfectly legal in their satanic, fictional world version of a legal system because the 'Special Needs' person doesn't have the legal capacity to consent/agree/contract, so someone else consents on their behalf.
If you think this is wrong, then we need to get back to the Fair and Equitable version of a legal system from the previous civilisation [when they had the free energy, super nutritional food, living water, beneficial frequencies etc.]
Read discussionRight, but perfectly legal in their satanic, fictional world version of a legal system because the 'Special Needs' person doesn't have the legal capacity to consent/agree/contract, so someone else consents on their behalf.
If you think this is wrong, then we need to get back to the Fair and Equitable version of a legal system from the previous civilisation [when they had the free energy, super nutritional food, living water, beneficial frequencies etc.]
09 Dec 2021 12:29:04
Even if you send a letter/notice to the Principal/Headmaster, and then follow up with a phone call to them asking if they received the letter/notice and getting a reassurance from them that under no circumstances is your offspring to be injected with anything; Don't assume that your offspring won't be injected, because it's likely that a group of people will show up at the school, hand a piece of paper to the Principal/Headmaster and then the children will be lined up for jabs.
So in addition to the letter/notice, you'd want a back up plan, such as telling your child to run out of school.
Homeschooling sounds good to me, if possible.
Read discussionEven if you send a letter/notice to the Principal/Headmaster, and then follow up with a phone call to them asking if they received the letter/notice and getting a reassurance from them that under no circumstances is your offspring to be injected with anything; Don't assume that your offspring won't be injected, because it's likely that a group of people will show up at the school, hand a piece of paper to the Principal/Headmaster and then the children will be lined up for jabs.
So in addition to the letter/notice, you'd want a back up plan, such as telling your child to run out of school.
Homeschooling sounds good to me, if possible.
07 Dec 2021 14:14:07
Hopefully Unapologetically negative now realises that we've been lied to about everything to do with the word 'Covid'. We don't need any test to tell us we're ill because we can feel it.
Read discussionHopefully Unapologetically negative now realises that we've been lied to about everything to do with the word 'Covid'. We don't need any test to tell us we're ill because we can feel it.