01 Nov 2021 00:22:11
Ugh, I think the guy has misread the CDC report. Leading cause of death was solely C.V. and directly attributable, 6%. 94% is from other things like respiratory and pneumonia, but worsened and attributed to C.V..
This isn't a secret and has never been lol.
Standard’s profile
Standard
Published posts and replies
30 Oct 2021 13:01:47
I believe I don't exist according to flat earth. Or am I on the other side of the flat earth? Poor Australia.
Read discussionI believe I don't exist according to flat earth. Or am I on the other side of the flat earth? Poor Australia.
29 Oct 2021 23:05:53
Tj70 you really need to apply your advice to yourself. It's embarrassing.
Read discussionTj70 you really need to apply your advice to yourself. It's embarrassing.
29 Oct 2021 23:06:47
There was water already here and then we probably got some more from an asteroid would be my guess. Surely there isn't a 'water conspiracy' as well?
Read discussionThere was water already here and then we probably got some more from an asteroid would be my guess. Surely there isn't a 'water conspiracy' as well?
29 Oct 2021 23:03:33
Yes ed33, like I though, your confused and don't understand the inverse law of light. Put your hand 5 inches In front of you. Now double the distance away from you. It doesn't get 50% dimmer does it.
Like I said, were seeing the entire moon face reflecting, not a small patch.
You're just a little bit confused about the law. I can recommended some good books on them if you're interested. Seems a bit advanced for you.
Read discussionYes ed33, like I though, your confused and don't understand the inverse law of light. Put your hand 5 inches In front of you. Now double the distance away from you. It doesn't get 50% dimmer does it.
Like I said, were seeing the entire moon face reflecting, not a small patch.
You're just a little bit confused about the law. I can recommended some good books on them if you're interested. Seems a bit advanced for you.
29 Oct 2021 23:30:52
Tj70 you didn't pay attention in your degree then if you still think the moon's a light source. You learn that very, very early in life.
Read discussionTj70 you didn't pay attention in your degree then if you still think the moon's a light source. You learn that very, very early in life.
29 Oct 2021 14:14:40
You lads are hilarious. The 'wake up' thing is beyond ridiculous. Instead of most of the apparent sheep being closed minded, maybe apply it to yourself and analyse whether your the ones in the wrong. Then you'll truly learn knowledge. got to be critical on yourself aswell.
Read discussionYou lads are hilarious. The 'wake up' thing is beyond ridiculous. Instead of most of the apparent sheep being closed minded, maybe apply it to yourself and analyse whether your the ones in the wrong. Then you'll truly learn knowledge. got to be critical on yourself aswell.
29 Oct 2021 14:45:40
Oh Tj70, the irony of a moonlanding denier being condescending. I have some advice for you aswell. Expand your 'research' from YouTube videos to academic literature and scientific studies. You might be a lot happier and less anxious about the world. Respectfully, Standard.
Read discussionOh Tj70, the irony of a moonlanding denier being condescending. I have some advice for you aswell. Expand your 'research' from YouTube videos to academic literature and scientific studies. You might be a lot happier and less anxious about the world. Respectfully, Standard.
29 Oct 2021 14:38:20
Not sure what the question is but I think you're a little bit confused. Lumens is total quantity of visible light emitted from a source. The moon isn't a light source, it reflects light from the sun. So i'm not really sure what your asking.
Why can we see the moonlight even though it's 200000 km away or whatever it is? Because we're seeing the entire moon face reflect the light, not a small surface patch of the moon. Hope this clarifies, your question didn't really make much sense.
Read discussionNot sure what the question is but I think you're a little bit confused. Lumens is total quantity of visible light emitted from a source. The moon isn't a light source, it reflects light from the sun. So i'm not really sure what your asking.
Why can we see the moonlight even though it's 200000 km away or whatever it is? Because we're seeing the entire moon face reflect the light, not a small surface patch of the moon. Hope this clarifies, your question didn't really make much sense.
29 Oct 2021 11:42:04
It's in the name mate i'll spin it then. Where's your evidence we haven't landed on the moon? Or, what would It take for you to believe in the moon landing?
Regarding booster shot, unless your old or have underlying health issues, no one needs the booster shot. I haven't actually looked into the booster shot data at all, there's probably less than 1% who've had the booster anyway.
Read discussionIt's in the name mate i'll spin it then. Where's your evidence we haven't landed on the moon? Or, what would It take for you to believe in the moon landing?
Regarding booster shot, unless your old or have underlying health issues, no one needs the booster shot. I haven't actually looked into the booster shot data at all, there's probably less than 1% who've had the booster anyway.
29 Oct 2021 00:03:57
8 years later and I'd still buy your book ed, I'm always interested in Alternative views. Regarding the video, it's correct we can't currently do it. Context is missing, we can't currently do it cost effectively. We could build the same ship for an outrageous sum or we could develop the new technology at a much cheaper rate. So we cannot currently, not literally, but metaphorically. It wouldn't make sense. Back in the day it did make sense, to beat the Russians. The spacecraft we used all them years ago were extremely expensive and it's now destroyed as they cannot be used. Elon Musk has solved part of that problem through reusing the rocket ships.
Regarding evidence we've landed on the moon, I'm sure everything you've read about it you don't believe in. So I won't even go into the physics side, but have you ever thought about how much effort would go into faking it? The ship was built, and launched, people were at the launch so that definitely happened. The amount of time building the ship happened, as there's records. And communication between the ship and control happened, again, because records. Seems like a lot of effort and landing on the moon would just be easier. Way too much effort involved for faking it.
Unless you believe that all of that was faked aswell, and in that case. I literally have to evidence for you. I wasn't even alive when this happened and I didn't bring a go pro with me on the trip, so I cannot prove it If the current evidence can :D
The moon landing is one of my favourite conspiracies so thanks for the video!
Read discussion8 years later and I'd still buy your book ed, I'm always interested in Alternative views. Regarding the video, it's correct we can't currently do it. Context is missing, we can't currently do it cost effectively. We could build the same ship for an outrageous sum or we could develop the new technology at a much cheaper rate. So we cannot currently, not literally, but metaphorically. It wouldn't make sense. Back in the day it did make sense, to beat the Russians. The spacecraft we used all them years ago were extremely expensive and it's now destroyed as they cannot be used. Elon Musk has solved part of that problem through reusing the rocket ships.
Regarding evidence we've landed on the moon, I'm sure everything you've read about it you don't believe in. So I won't even go into the physics side, but have you ever thought about how much effort would go into faking it? The ship was built, and launched, people were at the launch so that definitely happened. The amount of time building the ship happened, as there's records. And communication between the ship and control happened, again, because records. Seems like a lot of effort and landing on the moon would just be easier. Way too much effort involved for faking it.
Unless you believe that all of that was faked aswell, and in that case. I literally have to evidence for you. I wasn't even alive when this happened and I didn't bring a go pro with me on the trip, so I cannot prove it If the current evidence can :D
The moon landing is one of my favourite conspiracies so thanks for the video!
28 Oct 2021 15:04:56
I know i said I would stop posting on here but just got sentimental from Rian thinking I'm a troll and haven't been on this page 8 years ago. Just found my old name and it's quite a laugh, I was far down the rabbit hole. Aron, was the sign off I used. I even once said I'd buy your book ed33, so let's see if we can repair our friendship a little bit lol.
28 Oct 2021 15:35:17
You're absolutely right SM, just watched the video in full. I can prove evolution, look at the delta variant and different strains of a C.V.. Simple. There's nothing simple about evolution though so if you're expecting it to be as simple as 2+2 then you're not going to have much luck.
Read discussionYou're absolutely right SM, just watched the video in full. I can prove evolution, look at the delta variant and different strains of a C.V.. Simple. There's nothing simple about evolution though so if you're expecting it to be as simple as 2+2 then you're not going to have much luck.
28 Oct 2021 14:53:00
Yes SM, people are followers. Just like you are following other conspiracists lol. I meant more so the video. Don't think many would act that badly like a fool lol.
Read discussionYes SM, people are followers. Just like you are following other conspiracists lol. I meant more so the video. Don't think many would act that badly like a fool lol.
28 Oct 2021 14:53:52
Rian, try Billy01 I think, can't remember my old user. I do remember Franky scouser though. Not a troll at all.
Read discussionRian, try Billy01 I think, can't remember my old user. I do remember Franky scouser though. Not a troll at all.
27 Oct 2021 00:42:16
Final post from me because I keep getting called a troll and it's not very enjoyable. I believe in conspiracies where there is legitimate evidence but the whole physics system being wrong, perpetual motion machines being real, zero energy, dinosaurs being fake, all the vax stuff is too far for me. Not because my eyes are closed but because I've looked into them.
If I have 4 Mates, only 4 that takes the vax and All 4 get sick. I'm not going to then say it's 100% unnafective and a population control method. i'm going to look at the broader scope and realise I was just very unlucky. The confirmation bias is also very strong on this site.
Like I said, I did come to this site for a good discussion as I used to post semi frequently here. Now that I don't believe in super weapons, and flat earth and other, easily disapproved lies I'm not allowed here because I'm a troll.
You guys really need to better understand people and realise not everyone thinks the same and maybe, there are people that know more than you. You guys may know more than me, which is why I'm here, but I've seen nothing to suggest that's the case so far.
I'll enjoy being a 'sheep' and you guys can enjoy being 'nutjobs'
Respectfully, Standard.
27 Oct 2021 00:35:21
Southern monkey I haven't watched this because fossils exist. Like I said I'll believe conspiracies if there's evidence but something like this. Not for me man. I watched the physics video and it was full of errors lol.
Fully vaxxed and feeling fine, like 99 or something % of recipients of the vax :D.
Read discussionSouthern monkey I haven't watched this because fossils exist. Like I said I'll believe conspiracies if there's evidence but something like this. Not for me man. I watched the physics video and it was full of errors lol.
Fully vaxxed and feeling fine, like 99 or something % of recipients of the vax :D.
26 Oct 2021 01:08:07
Very small sample size. Would be interesting to see a bigger study with more individuals tested rather than 1 obviously conforming to pressure lol.
Read discussionVery small sample size. Would be interesting to see a bigger study with more individuals tested rather than 1 obviously conforming to pressure lol.
26 Oct 2021 01:03:07
Interesting but his math is very, very off. The first 10 minutes were littered with errors, 360 x 4 is also not 1470.
As a physics student, there's a lot he's missing and studying into the subject will show you that.
Thanks for the link though.
Read discussionInteresting but his math is very, very off. The first 10 minutes were littered with errors, 360 x 4 is also not 1470.
As a physics student, there's a lot he's missing and studying into the subject will show you that.
Thanks for the link though.
25 Oct 2021 13:54:55
Like I said mate I used to come on here a lot.
No, not too advanced at all. I respect people's opinions but like I said, some people have an inferiority complex and don't believe there are people smarter than them, or, they like to believe the world's against them.
Again, it's interesting to look at and I genuinely did want some perspective, so I appreciate your response southern monkey.
Would be nice to talk to you lads in person but that's obviously impossible. Hope you guys are well but definitely cannot agree with anyone that doesn't believe research journals and peer reviewed research is the correct method of thinking. Cheers.
Read discussionLike I said mate I used to come on here a lot.
No, not too advanced at all. I respect people's opinions but like I said, some people have an inferiority complex and don't believe there are people smarter than them, or, they like to believe the world's against them.
Again, it's interesting to look at and I genuinely did want some perspective, so I appreciate your response southern monkey.
Would be nice to talk to you lads in person but that's obviously impossible. Hope you guys are well but definitely cannot agree with anyone that doesn't believe research journals and peer reviewed research is the correct method of thinking. Cheers.