22 May 2021 18:18:39
Ed you got any links / gov links even better stipulating the vaxs are only for emergency use and not backed by mhra etc.
{Ed033's Note - If you look on search engines, newspapers have stories stating emergency use.
If you want government using the words temporary and emergency supply then here is one - Conditions for authorisation for emergency supply under Regulation 174 for COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca
I guess there is one for Pfizer as well.
MHRA seem to be given the ability to withdraw these vaxs or issue the "full market authorisation" in the future - [Within the above .gov .pdf] "12. This authorisation will be valid until expressly withdrawn by MHRA or upon issue of a full market authorisation by the MHRA."
If you want government using the words temporary and emergency supply then here is one - Conditions for authorisation for emergency supply under Regulation 174 for COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca
I guess there is one for Pfizer as well.
MHRA seem to be given the ability to withdraw these vaxs or issue the "full market authorisation" in the future - [Within the above .gov .pdf] "12. This authorisation will be valid until expressly withdrawn by MHRA or upon issue of a full market authorisation by the MHRA."
23 May 2021 09:57:08
Thanks Ed that's great trying to have a conversation with someone who has had the vax. Sent him a few bits now hopefully he now understands the vax is not licensed.
Thanks Ed that's great trying to have a conversation with someone who has had the vax. Sent him a few bits now hopefully he now understands the vax is not licensed.
{Ed033's Note - Right, i presume none of the vax companies can get a license from MHRA until 2023.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0