06 Jul 2016 22:27:30 Ed/ anyone. I'm pretty much 99% sure Dr kelly wa… · #11856

Discussion #11856Talk Sense

06 Jul 2016 22:27:30
Ed/ anyone. I'm pretty much 99% sure Dr kelly was assassinated. I'm a little swayed in thinking that Robin Cook was too. Both obviously interpreting information differently regarding going to war in Iraq. Just what's happened in the last day has brought it back to me. What's your thoughts?

 

{Ed033's Note - All Dr kelly did was to say Blair lied, but the problem was he was an insider and insiders aren't allowed to talk to the media because they know a lot. They killed him because otherwise it would of given the green light to other insiders to come out and talk to the media and sooner or later someone would start telling the truth. so they killed Dr Kelly to send a message to other insiders to keep quiet and never talk to any media.

Robin Cook was killed exactly the same way as Labour leader, John Smith was, using a heart attack 'gun' which sends microwave energy to the victim to stop their heart. Both Robin Cook and John Smith were on walking holidays when they were murdered.

It was thought that John Smith wouldn't go along with the Iraq War and weapons of mass 'distraction' (as Tony Blair once said in error). The control group knew Tony Blair would go along with the whole Iraq war fiasco after Blair went to the Bilderberg meeting just before John Smith's murder.

Robin Cook (a millionaire author who didn't need the money from being an MP) was about to reveal that there was no discussions within the cabinet and Tony Blair just dictated to the cabinet what was to take place (with Tony Blair being told what to do by Blair's handler). So they took out Robin Cook permanently to prevent this coming out.
Mr.x
07 Jul 2016 00:53:03
Yep, that's what they call democracy haha. Sometimes you look at these cases of suspected assassinations and just think we're not much better off than countries that live under a dictatorship or communist rule. If the truth can't be revealed by the people we trusted to put in power then are we that different from the governments and regimes we call bad if we just give in to corruption and corporate greed. While all the time we hide under the veil we call democracy and that somehow makes us feel better. TRUE democracy would be great but power, greed and corruption will always come out on top if the masses don't wake up.
{Ed033's Note - yes, most people believe in the illusion of democracy but we're actually living under a dictatorship (that currently uses the velvet glove if you think and do exactly as the government wants you to think and do.)
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Supasub
07 Jul 2016 01:06:48
Funny you mention John Smith ed. I posted about this a couple of weeks ago when the whole brexit thing was going on. I was quite young when he died but my step father who was a socialist at heart but had always voted tory for as long as I remember mentioned him as someone who would get his vote for whatever reason, what little I know gave the impression that he was as honest as they came in a politician sense and was fairly genuine. My parents brought me up to believe that in general politicians were untrustworthy and some more untrustworthy than others. If there were any honest politicians then they were very few and far between but he appeared to maybe be one of them. Then just as he takes leadership (I think) he dies of a heart attack and Blair is thrust before us. On another note how does Alistair Campbell not even get a mention today? He just makes me feel dirty when I see him or hear him speak. Add Mandelson to that too.
{Ed033's Note - yes, there are a few good non corrupt MPs always about and John Smith was apparently one of the good ones and therefore as we know Tony Blair did so much harm as the Establishment wanted, it's highly likely John Smith would never had gone along with all the evil stuff, so from their point of view, John Smith had to be removed permanently.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Rian
07 Jul 2016 15:48:02
I think you're right about David Kelly.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
07 Jul 2016 17:46:14
Yes, and I've heard quite a few different accounts of the directed energy 'gun' being real.
If I remember right a clever man / scientist called John Hutchinson had a big one on his van lol.
But he just can't get funded for his science, basically been cut off. no one invests in him because he is on the same line as tesla.
I even think he may have worked with him. don't know for sure as I can't remember if it was him that said this.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
southampton87
07 Jul 2016 17:51:13
Also there are many people to have claimed to be T.Is (targeted individuals) in America and a couple in Britain.

Also on a side note the tetra system the police use, works on a dangerous frequency / microwave that interferes with the chemical process in your body making you depressed. This can in theory back up claims of directed energy weapons being possible.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.