Talk Sense

Share your thoughts. Join the discussion.

Display settings
16px

Talk Sense

Message from the editors

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

Discussion #8608Talk Sense

07 Sep 2024 23:59:44
Have We Found Tartaria?

 

rank0 rank1 rank2 Ed033
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Ed032
09 Sep 2024 19:58:42
It really is amazing just how powerful the spell must be to be blinded to what is hidden in plain sight, right?
{Ed033's Note - Right, just like nothing exploded and created everything.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Ed032
10 Sep 2024 14:09:48
Now that's just crazy talk, Ed 🤪
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #4525Talk Sense

07 Sep 2024 12:33:10
Austin Whitsitt presents Flat Earth 101

youtube.com/watch?v=dbeOu33lkgA

 

Ed032
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #4524Talk Sense

07 Sep 2024 08:45:17
NATO's 515-Mile Microwave Transmission Proves Flat Earth

youtube.com/watch?v=n2r6hFMBaKE

 

{Ed033's Note - Excellent watch, try debunking the video. thanks Ed032
Ed032
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Southampton1987
10 Sep 2024 22:39:36
Yeah, as science tells us, it's meant to bounce off ions that are part of the atmosphere. But as they say the height it apparently bounces back from isn't high enough.

But it would only need to bounce off the atmosphere if it was on a globe, or could just travel in a straight line.

But then u got to ask, if on a flat Earth would it not travel more than the 515 miles as stated? Conditions and air density maybe limiting it?

Good video.
{Ed033's Note - This is emitter/receiver technology, so the distance is limited by the emitter/receiver technology [conditions may affect the distance to some degree?]. In the past they didn't have the tech to send and receive signals from 515 miles away. In the future they may be able to increase the distance.

This tech needs line of sight to bounce signals off a target. So at 515 miles away it would only work on a 'Flat Earth' becuase the physical curvature of a globe would prevent the line of sight.

This is why they have to make up the fantasy that they can bounce the signals off of air molecules. What they have to do is pretend that the signals ignore the air molecules all the way up to a certain height, and then fantasy molecules are not only capable of bouncing signals off of, but these fantasy molecules know exactly where to target the signals.

Now, it might be possible to bounce the signals off of the Firmament, but that would let the cat out of the bag.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Ed032
11 Sep 2024 19:28:35
I think people are overlooking what the air molecules can do, and just how 'magical' they are. Not only can they chose to bounce a linear signal directly to a finite recipient apparatus hundreds of miles away (the molecules have a great sense of direction and where signals need to go!), they can also chose not to bounce back signals or do anything to some signals, at will, so that Nasaholes can communicate with their alleged 'outer space satellites', let alone their balloon rockets that go nowhere but sideways. And what is even stranger is the fact the higher you go, there are less molecules to bounce off of. Amazing stuff, air!

Must be something to do with gravity. That seems the go to answer of explaining BS and that can't be proved either, still being a theory and all. Much like everything we are told is 'fact' and 'truth'.

Wait a second....maybe they lie?
{Ed033's Note - Excellently put.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Southampton1987
12 Sep 2024 00:36:55
Humidity and so on, yes could affect it, I would assume. They probably have already got a more powerful one.
But then they would have to change height it bounces back from lol.
When it would go further.
Make more fibs to cover the story.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Southampton1987
12 Sep 2024 16:44:04
Sound ed33
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #4523Talk Sense

04 Sep 2024 15:15:14
'Comets'; alleged objects of various sizes made up of rock and metals, out-gas its elements when exposed to the light of the Sun because they have no protective atmosphere and are super-heated.

Is it not strange that our Moon, without an atmos(fear) to protect itself, does not portray these same effects and yet lays in a perpetual state of rest and is as it was billions of years ago, NASA footprints and all?

Hmmmm.

Anyone that thinks for themselves would assume we are being lied to?

 

{Ed033's Note - Unless people want to believe the mainstream propaganda, we have no idea what comets are or what the Moon is.
Ed032
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Ed032
05 Sep 2024 19:35:49
We have ideas. Just no proof. I did have thousands of reels of data on the subject, but I had to erase it all out of existence. ;)
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Scouseduckred
08 Sep 2024 11:44:14
Neither a flat earther or a glober. But accepting that the data clearly shows we are not on a spinning globe. Personally we're either on a stationary plane or the 'planet' is far bigger than the experts claim. Either way the controllers are lying.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Ed032
09 Sep 2024 17:27:58
Neither a flat Earther or glober you be. Yet you are gifted with the eyes to see.

Good to hear from you, Scouseduckred. Nice to see the stalwarts are still hanging around. Seems awful quiet round here, sad to say.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #4522Talk Sense

04 Sep 2024 14:43:02
'Balloon' satellites have been launched towards the upper atmosphere and into alleged 'Space' since the 1960's. Is the difference between then and now; CGI has improved exponentially?

Pathe News -

https://youtu.be/grLV5bIHSG0

 

{Ed033's Note - Thanks Ed032, yes CGI has improved is the only difference.
Ed032
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #4521Talk Sense

04 Sep 2024 14:31:07
The Biagong pipes, China. Unexplained by the 'taught' narrative.

Is this proof that this Realm is formed of fantastical beings of Biblical size? Compelling food for thought.

https://youtu.be/dtl0f2JE-kw

 

{Ed033's Note - Thanks Ed032, overall, it seems there is evidence suggesting titan sized beings both flora and forna were on Earth in the past.
Ed032
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Ed032
05 Sep 2024 19:31:30
Yes, Ed. As has been shown on this site previously, Stellium7 has made a brilliant series called 'Unveiling A Titan'. This is a very in-depth study of a mountain which would appear to show that it is a biological fossil of a giant, titan-sized elephant or similar. To anyone interested in expanding their mind and has any sort of interest in this subject I highly recommend watching this.

Here is the playlist for the aforementioned series;


Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #8607Talk Sense

01 Sep 2024 08:28:29
1800's - Giants, Orphans and Asylums?

 

rank0 rank1 rank2 Ed033
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #8606Talk Sense

31 Aug 2024 21:41:33
Steve Falconer - biochemical tissue cell salts and the physio-chemical workings of the Zodiac mystery school teachings.

old.bitchute.com/video/Z3h7hOYF9Af4/

 

rank0 rank1 rank2 Ed033
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Ed032
05 Sep 2024 19:56:13
I really hope Steve hasn't become an official member of the 'black eye club'!? That would make me very sad. He is brilliant 👏
{Ed033's Note - Well spotted about his one eye.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Ed032
05 Sep 2024 20:30:00
Man, Minerals and Masters - Charles W. Littlefield - PDF here
{Ed033's Note - Thanks Ed032
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11027Talk Sense

30 Aug 2024 23:40:39
Any info would be appreciated. I bought a 20 plate car about 5 months ago, today the engine decided it was hungry I suppose and tried to eat a spark plug. Not done anything good for the engine lol. The way I see it, I talk to Vauxhall see what they they as the spark plug has failed before manufacture guidelines for replacement causing serious damage to the engine 33k miles.

I talk to the garage I bought it from as the garage which has found the issue also says for this to happen the engine must of been burning oil to cause the failure of the spark plug which means I was sold a car with a serious problem.

The finance company as I have a car for 5 months which is not fit for purpose after 5 months and less than 1k travel per month. The warranty company which if they don't weasel out of their responsibility will no doubt be capped at an amount which won't cover the costs or do I have to suck it up? Any advice or help greatly appreciated.

 

{Ed033's Note - At a guess, immediately try to work out if the warranty covers what you want to claim for. Then whether you can figure out if are covered or not immediately phone your insurance company's claims number. You have to follow the claim guidelines in your insurance documents. Your insurance company should tell you your closest authorised garage if you're covered.

If you're not covered, you could try to look online for what the legal stance is for your situation, which is easier said than done, but you may find a similar example to your situation [on a forum?] where the affected party threatened legal action on the responsible party.

If you can't find this, then you could attempt to get some free legal advice from citizens advice bureau or maybe a solicitor can initially tell you whether it's worth a solicitor helping you.
p1
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Ed032
05 Sep 2024 19:59:50
Keep us informed of how things go, p1. Sounds like you're in a really unfair position. Hoping you get things sorted out without you losing out, as that's how it should be. Fingers crossed for you 🤞
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #8605Talk Sense

29 Aug 2024 09:04:16
NICOTINE Can Remove Injected Nanotech?

 

rank0 rank1 rank2 Ed033
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11026Talk Sense

28 Aug 2024 00:11:59
Settle your water bill effortlessly?

 

{Ed033's Note - Thanks p1.
p1
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11881Talk Sense

22 Aug 2024 12:48:21
Hi Ed, do you know if Ed032 will be back in future? Just wondering if he was ok.

 

{Ed033's Note - I don't know whether in the future Ed032 will be back on this site.
Supasub
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Ed032
28 Aug 2024 15:43:08
Hi, Supasub. Wierdly I just unlocked this site from my own censorship of the internet, just now, and found your post on top.

I am OK, I guess. I got myself into a whole heap of trouble trying to find evidence of nefarious elite activity and ended up being the one facing an almost year-long investigation, which concluded with me having to have monitoring software on my devices.

Thanks for thinking of me, sir. *dobs hat.
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Supasub
29 Aug 2024 17:51:15
Coolio, glad you're ok.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create a new post

Log in or register to post.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Log inRegister

Posts appear after editor approval.