Talk Sense

Message from the editors

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

Discussion #11414Talk Sense

21 Jan 2016 13:13:46
I see that the litvenko story is on the news again, obviously I wouldn't take what they have to say on it. So could any of you explain to me your thoughts on it please.

KimPhilby
21 Jan 2016 14:02:12
He worked in both counter terrorism and anti corruption so knew about a lot of shady incidents from the 90s and things that could be very bad for some high up dangerous people to cross.

If you can get hold of either of his books they are worth a read.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
RoscoJEF
21 Jan 2016 15:38:38
Thanks Kim I'll have a look for them.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
KimPhilby
21 Jan 2016 15:59:17
They certainly put things in a new light. I won't comment on the veracity as I had quit moscow by the late 90s. But some things I had heard of and some things I suspected.

He was advised London wasn't the safest place to be saying such things from.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
KimPhilby
21 Jan 2016 20:01:45
One of them is available for a reasonable fee

Alexander Litvinenko book search on amazon
goo.gl/OMgGTr
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9455Talk Sense

20 Jan 2016 13:25:47
Hi ed what's your thoughts on the bbc programme "the town that took on the tax man"! It's About how all the small business in one small town are mimicking what all the huge firms like Amazon do to avoid paying tax in the uk whilst making money here a reported tax of 1.3 million on 53 billion of sales in the uk! It's obviously discussing and we know how they get away with it!

If you were to become self employed could you do a similar scam!

And also it's strange the Beeb are making this public knowledge seen as they are always balls deep in the government

 

{Ed033's Note - it looks like the program is designed to outrage people and it's certainly worked on you for sure. All part of the many centuries old system called [by david icke], 'problem, reaction solution'. Show the population a problem (whether real, exaggerated or fake), get the outrage reaction from the ignorant population, offer the draconian solution, which has been asked for by the population.

I would imagine there will be a spate of 'financial cheat' 'alerts'/'programs' coming from main stream media, government, EU over the next several months to years designed to enrage you for the following 2 main reasons.

1. i would imagine that they believe that we're possibly entering into a further financial downturn with many more people out of work (see Lowest Ever Baltic Dry Index ), so they want your agreement to get tough economically. And in theory, because you're enraged, you can't disagree with any of it.

This means not only will you agree with government going after any 'financial cheat' of any kind in an iron fisted draconian manner, you can't disagree with incredible ludicrous austerity measures, cutting of all benefits, little spending on infrastructure and more importantly, you won't disagree with higher taxes (all taxes).

2. government has to some how pay though for all the millions of foreign invaders (from Africa / middle east) plus their entire families arriving later (that will not stop coming into Europe even though this will cause more financial problems for Europe)

In other words they want you to agree to the ruination of Britain. Your ignorance and political correctness means you're just going to standby and allow and watch the complete ruination of Europe.
grow bun28
20 Jan 2016 20:00:50
I would prefer to work out how to scam the tax man
{Ed033's Note - You're not thinking straight grow bun. You don't scam the tax man, the tax man scams you. In order to work out what you want to know, you would want to work out how the tax man scams you.

But for people who work for someone else, you ask the boss not to hire you as an 'employee', but under a new separate private contract between you and them, with no third party involved/attached to the contract and also no national insurance number involved, no communicating of the contract to anyone else. The boss pays you all of the money, and you decide how much you want to voluntarily give away.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
grow bun28
20 Jan 2016 22:06:42
That's what I have been looking into ed!
{Ed033's Note - According to a previous post of yours grow bun, you have a high paying job around 50k in the oil business + you do something else. i don't know why you would want to look into this area as you've said you're doing nicely before. (unless either then or now you're high on something)
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
grow bun28
21 Jan 2016 14:03:23
No that is correct ed! But if you remember the first post that first alerted me to this page I am in a funny situation where I live with my new partner who has 4 children and I have to pay CSA for my own 3 children which is 1200 a month! I get paid 3500 a month on average do by the time I pay 1200 CSA 1000 rent 140 council tax 120 gas/elect 600 digs for work 50 car insurance etc etc I'm left with about 3-400 to get food for a family of 6 for a month and I'm broke. Because I earn so much I am not eligible for any benifit and my ex boyfriend doesn't work so dosent pay for his kids and I'm supposed to pay for 7 children . I have done a benifit calculator and I would be £130 a week better off doing 24 hrs a week on minimum wage?! Go figure, that's why I want to look into been self employed
{Ed033's Note - Are you male or female grow bun because from your posts elsewhere, you seem to be pretty butch for a female?
The above only makes sense if you're female and you had 3 children with your ex-boyfriend or english is not your first language.

From a previous post, it appears that you are doing something that you class as 'self employed' and you're not paying tax on it as yet, so what are you ultimately asking here? If this is correct, why not get a 24 hour a week job at minimum wage and continue with your 'self employment'.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
KimPhilby
21 Jan 2016 16:09:08
The only way to beat the tax man is to be one of the super rich.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
grow bun28
21 Jan 2016 17:12:18
Ha sorry ed I meant my girlfriends ex 😳 No going self employed will help me lots! Basically my girlfriend will own the "recruitment" business in which she will charge for my services £500 a day and then pay me a wage! A very minimum wages which is £180 a week or so at 24 hours! In that way CSA will only take £80 a month and the remainder of the money she will take a wage and then off set money on expenses etc and pay 20% on the profit! I just wondered if there was another more profitable way to keep more of MY money seen as your knowledgable on such things! But yeah in theory it will save me about £1500 a month and will be then entitled to certain benifit a as the income won't be 75k
{Ed033's Note - that sounds like a good plan and anything else wouldn't be worth the hassle, imo. Do that and see how it goes first.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 8 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #5192Talk Sense

20 Jan 2016 16:43:45
hi leahy12, my reply is on the legal/lawful page

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #12028Talk Sense

20 Jan 2016 15:57:17
The David Griffin videos are fascinating ed, watch them last night.
The idea of a terminator, liquid like android doesn't seem so far fetched now.
The fact Ireland was mentioned by the host a couple of times made it all the more interesting to me.

 

{Ed033's Note - Certainly is fascinating and ties a number of anomalous events together.
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #12027Talk Sense

20 Jan 2016 15:52:20
I'm back over in London working for the next few months. I have been doing a bit of jogging walking from a tube station a couple stops short etc. I noticed an ad for a local gym, very reasonably priced and decided to investigate.
All looked good until I found entry was gained by biometric fingerprint scanner. I declined not because I have done anything that would interest any security organisations I just think big brother is imposing himself more and more
How much more information does these faceless people need.

 

{Ed001's Note - wow, that is scary for a gym to want to use that.}
TTTS
20 Jan 2016 16:19:42
My thoughts too.
{Ed001's Note - like you I would just use a different gym.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
TTTS
20 Jan 2016 22:29:43
It's 1 of the chains. Lifted a brochure, it mentions the fingerprint scanning too.
{Ed033's Note - it's good to use your purchasing power to get companies to change their policies or go out of business, except the problem we have is when government make it mandatory for companies/places to have such policies.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
KimPhilby
21 Jan 2016 12:59:40
And it will become mandatory.
{Ed001's Note - sadly you are right.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
KimPhilby
21 Jan 2016 13:20:02
We live in a totalitarian system masquerading in the disguise of democracy.

The nazis and soviets had i'd cards. Its been decided at the highest level in Brussels to bring them in.

Biometric i'd cards to allow access to train stations, airports, even shops. All in the name of security.
{Ed001's Note - I fully agree. All of it pretending to be in our interests, by faking events to scare us into kowtowing to their demands. Everytime they go too far and we fight back, a compromise is accepted that is another step closer to a 4th reich. Then a few years later we end up having the original proposal pushed through to 'protect us'.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
KimPhilby
21 Jan 2016 13:46:21
Indeed. Isn't there already some cars that can be activated only by biometrics? Supposedly as an anti theft device but by a remarkable coincidence astonishingly handy for tracking.

To go off on a slightly related tangent its interesting to see politicians who have been committed eurosceptics for decades suddenly become pro European regards to Britains referendum. What dirt could they have?
{Ed001's Note - they are politicians, they will have so much dirt you could bury the entire cast of zombie extras from The Walking Dead in it.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 9 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11794Talk Sense

20 Jan 2016 07:45:19
What do people think of Megalodon sharks? Do they still exist?

 

Tuor10
20 Jan 2016 12:56:52
There was that incident a few years ago where a 9 foot White Shark had been tagged; and when the scientists who tagged it were analysing the data, they found out that the shark had been chased by another predator and eaten whole. They came to this conclusion because of the instant change of body temperature.
Some seem to think it is an extremely large White Shark in the region of 25 + foot; while some speculate it was something else. The Megladon was mentioned.

goo.gl/EPiWcH

I actually think it was a massive White. I have seen an 18 footer up close when I was in SA. It was truly amazing to see such a creature. The thought of them being bigger is amazing. I mean, I cannot describe just how incredible they are.
{Ed033's Note - It's likely that this White Shark was eaten by 1 or several killer whales. Killer whales can hunt in packs.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
grow bun28
20 Jan 2016 13:28:55
Who knows what exists or still exists in the deep! We apparently know more about space.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Tuor10
20 Jan 2016 15:20:47
I agree with you Bun. Who knows what lurks down there.

BTW Ed: I believe they dismissed Killer Whales because of the depth the Shark was killed at and the body temperature of the predator that killed the Shark was different to a Killer Whale.
{Ed001's Note - seems unlikely they would know that, considering Sperm Whales hunt at the deeper depths and the only known predator of the Great White is the Killer Whale. There are Orca pods which specialise in hunting and eating sharks, in particular Great Whites.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Tuor10
20 Jan 2016 17:00:46
Not sure Ed. I am not that informed about Killer Whales and their attack patterns; or the depths in which they attack. I am just quoting what the scientists said.
{Ed001's Note - most scientists know little about them either mate, it is only recently they even realised that pods of Orca hunt Great Whites. Scientists also claimed they were no danger to humans, even though abalone divers in US would tell tales of how dangerous they are. When the divers for the D-Day landings were sent to the States to train in clearing mines prior to the attack, the local divers would tell them that they were to immediately get out of the water if Orca were spotted but they said Great Whites were unlikely to attack. Scientists always used to dismiss that as fanciful tales, but now it is known Orca are extremely dangerous under certain conditions.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Tuor10
20 Jan 2016 17:57:42
I watched a good documentary about them once, which showed these Killer Whales toying with a seal before they killed it. I felt for the poor old seal.
{Ed001's Note - they are incredibly intelligent as well.}
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 7 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #9836Talk Sense

20 Jan 2016 00:07:37
Ed033, I was just wandering what's your take on the Manchester canal deaths, it's hard to know if these are accidents, and there's a lot of unexplained details like where one young mans passport and phone were never found, the police deny a serial killer involved but a lot of people believe there is a killer involved, I would like to know if anyone has any interest or views on this. Thanks ed.

 

{Ed033's Note - 61 deaths in 6 years does seem too many to be all accidents, imo. And it doesn't have to be one single killer either.

It's also typical of the police not wanting to investigate because it would cost them money and each police force is only interested in making money not losing it in investigating. They only investigate if they're paid to investigate.

Each police force is always making applications to government for money to investigate this or that and they won't do anything unless they get paid and then the investigation will use less money than they're paid so they can make a profit.
Tuor10
20 Jan 2016 12:17:02
When you look at those who go missing and are never found, I wonder why we hear such little about it. But as Ed has pointed out, the funding isn't there for the police to investigate all the missing people.

Another interesting facet to this is the amount of people who go missing near national parks. Not just in Europe, but in North America. Some guy recently brought a book out about it. Some of the cases he mentions belong in the 'high strange' category.
{Ed033's Note - Yes, David Paulides has written multiple books known as the Missing 411 project and i have posted multiple videos of him speaking about the strange disappearances.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
grow bun28
20 Jan 2016 13:28:30
That's it ed at the end of the day the police are the largest organised gang in the country and only operate in their means.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #8923Talk Sense

18 Jan 2016 22:54:32
Hi people and Eds! You posted my band's debut track, 'FLUORIDE' last month (we write exclusively about conspiracies and politics). Here is our second release, 'UNIFORMS'; a track about oppression and the police state. Any shares/support would be great! Thanks

Please Note: Music video contains video of police officers beating people up

 

{Ed033's Note - Another good track
HERBIE
19 Jan 2016 14:41:05
What a great track.
Spot on.
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #5191Talk Sense

18 Jan 2016 17:13:25
The Truth About The Crusades.

 

Tuor10
20 Jan 2016 12:19:32
Slightly off topic, but I had a debate/ argument with a guy at work - who happens to be Muslim - about the Crusades. I told him that the Muslims initiated the conflict in the first place, when the Muslim Caliphate invaded Persia and then attacked the Roman Eastern Empire. In fact, the longest war in History was between the Muslims and the Roman Empire, which last from the 7th century until the 15th.

Some people just don't like facts.
{Ed033's Note - it's the same with most religious people regardless of which religion. The main religions are there to mind control people regardless of general intelligence level to be a controlled army who will help the controllers carry out an agenda. And there's more religions than we know. Leftism, Feminism, Political correctness are all religions.

In theory, the controllers can get any religious group to either stand down and turn the other cheek or to continuously make demands to governments until something is done or even to act as an army in small groups or large groups.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #5190Talk Sense

18 Jan 2016 10:37:07
Stefan Molyneux talks about the The German Rape Attacks on New Years Eve

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #5189Talk Sense

17 Jan 2016 21:46:52
David Paulides radio interview on very strange disappearances of hundreds of people in urban locations. (as opposed to strange disappearances of hundreds of people in rural areas / National Parks).

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #5188Talk Sense

16 Jan 2016 23:16:43
The Real Merlin and the Discovery of Avalon in the New World.

 

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create a new post

Log in or register to post.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.