29 Sep 2014 14:45:02
deffo a shadow government behind most if not all leaders, if we found who or what they are then we could point the finger on every conspiracy we have all posted.
Reply to this post
Log in or register to reply.
29 Sep 2014 01:38:58
Does anyone think that WM cutting benefits to 16-21 year olds is a precursor for reintroducing conscription/national service?
Reply to this post
Log in or register to reply.
29 Sep 2014 01:37:40
The Acts of Union uphold Scots Law which states ownership of land extends DOWN to the Earth's core, so how can WM sell fracking licences?
{Ed033's Note - Because virtually everyone believes (because they're brainwashed) that whatever rule or statute the government creates, must be obeyed.
Reply to this post
Log in or register to reply.
28 Sep 2014 17:09:13
On the talk of 9/11, was in New York couple of days ago, and went to memorial, was pretty s***, nothing was there, but it was weird
Looking at some of the beams and stuff, standing right underneath where the towers were
Defensively wasn't Terrorists, just saying.
When the establishment falls, the 11/09 site will be known as the place where the awakening of humanity began. The place where the unstoppable force moved the previously considered immovable object.
zari
Agree · 5 · Disagree · 0
There have been many deceptions but 9/11 was the most ambitious. Those behind it were cocky to the point it insulted our collective intelligence.
But the worrying thing is so many people believe the official story.
Zari I hope you are right. But 13 years on I still see only a small number of people awakened.
It really bothers me that so many people are so resistant to simply thinking for themselves.
Ryan.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Hey Ryan, that is exactly why I believe 11/09 will be the establishments downfall and humanities gain. They showed their teeth far too soon and the people will remember that. All it takes is a small crack and time for a structure to collapse, irrelevantly of its size.
Relevantly, all it takes for one to free themselves from their conditioning is doubt. Everyday more people are doubting the "official" version of those events and in doing so, not only do they question all that followed and our present condition, but also the meaning of the word official. Thus our numbers are exponentially increasing, while the establishment is experiencing a dwindling of their ranks that resembles a geometric series with a constant ratio of 0.2 (1>r>0).
Be the change you want to see, see the change you want to be a part of. For seeing is not believing, believing is seeing that which is already there.
zari
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post
Log in or register to reply.
28 Sep 2014 16:48:04
Regards todays poll question, why would the pope be forced out?
Kim Philby
{Ed033's Note - the previous Pope could have been forced out because of:
1) The papacy controllers thought it was time the Pope should leave office due to ritual prophesy timing. (least likely)
or
2) The Pope thought there was a good possibility that the gay/pedophile church parties which the Pope and other high ranking church members were allegedly part of could be released or used as blackmail, which he would've had to deal with, (so he resigned to avoid this). There is allegedly a secret 300-page Vatican dossier with the above info contained within it floating about. (most likely)
Watered down version of the above here:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/feb/21/pope-retired-amid-gay-bishop-blackmail-inquiry
Wasn't he implicated in a child abduction case along with Adolfo Nicolas who also resigned suddenly?
Ryan.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
28 Sep 2014 22:41:37
Ok thanks. Not an area of expertise so thought i'd ask.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Did you know that Queen Elizabeth was found guilty [by an international common law court] on February 28, 2013 in the disappearance of ten native children from the British Columbia Catholic Kamloops residential school on October 10, 1964? Pope Ratzinger resigned from office that same day on February 28, 2013. So, how does the Queen retain her title and stay out of prison?
Pope Francis’, Pope Benedict’s and Queen Elizabeth’s use of a Vatican agreement called 'Crimen Solicitationas' prevented release of information to legal authorities for prosecution of crimes against an estimated millions of priest, child abuse victims.
A Vatican source claimed to ITCCS' Kevin Annett that Queen Elizabeth signed the document with Pope Benedict on September 16, 2010 at Holyrood Castle in Edinburgh.
Evidence pertaining to the Feb. 2013 international court could be found in Annett’s 'Hidden No Longer' and at Child Abuse Recovery.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
It sickens me that I have been duped up about religion, I have no problem with other people if it gives them comfort, for me the roman catholic and any other church is a breeding ground for serial killers and pedophiles.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Not saying any of this is not true but the Queen is not Catholic, so how can she cited Catholic law and/or doctrine?
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Read all 9 replies
Reply to this post
Log in or register to reply.
28 Sep 2014 06:46:34
{Ed033's Note - One of the co-author scientists of a significant published study in 2004 showing no correlation between MMR vaccine and autism, now 10 years later admits the study was fraudulent as data showing a correlation between MMR and autism was left out of the study. Obviously now there is a cover-up
Investigative journalist, Jon Rappoport talks about this on Red Ice radio
http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/09/RIR-140926.php
Reply to this post
Log in or register to reply.
26 Sep 2014 22:17:54
Has anybody seen the BBC news report about 3 of the 9/11 firemen dying from cancer on the same day? It goes on to say that thousands have been diagnosed with medical conditions, including cancer, after helping with the rescue operation.
Is anyone familiar with this? It doesn't list any causes or reasons for the illnesses. Can anyone provide any info?
AngryChef
{Ed033's Note - Pay attention! as you obviously missed all of the below 9/11 information.
1. Long before 9/11, the twin towers were scheduled to have all the asbestos removed from them at a huge cost.
2. the twin towers were standing on a man made floor, known as the 'bathtub', if the full weight of the twin towers had hit the floor, then it would have cracked the 'bathtub' and the whole of Manhattan would have flooded. In order to prevent this, the twin towers were turned to dust on 9/11 using some unknown black technology, so the full weight of the twin towers would not hit the floor.
3. Shortly after 9/11 another building near the twin towers had to be demolished because part of it started disintegrating because whatever black technology had turned the twin towers to dust had 'infected' this other building.
Putting the above altogether, people involved in the rescue operation where exposed to and breathed in:
a. asbestos dust, (a known carcinogen)
b. concrete dust (a suspected carcinogen)
c. other dust from other parts of the twin towers which was all turned to dust using the unknown black technology such as glass and steel (breathing in this dust would probably lead to medical problems)
d. the dust while it was still in its 'disintegrating phase' so just as the disintegrating building in point 3 above, their lungs/other inner parts their bodies could have disintegrated to some degree causing medial problems
I thought building 7 got demolished because that's where the CIA organised the whole operation and wanted to get rid of all evidence.
Geordie Al
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Hi Geordie Al, that's the rumour about Building 7 and could be correct. It wouldn't surprise me that there's even more to Building 7 than that.
My point 3 above involves another building that's not building 7
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
I presume you're talking about WTC6 Ed033. I've read that it was looted of it's gold the day before 9/11.
Ryan.
{Ed033's Note - no, i'm talking about the Bankers Trust building
http://www.drjudywood.com/pdf/080324_SAIC_ExA91A16_16-23.pdf
Several of the WTC buildings were allegedly looted of Gold/bonds etc. on or the day before 911
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
I didn't know it was dismantled in 2012 due to contamination. It's very significant and I'm surprised more people aren't talking about it.
Ed033 have you come across Dimitri Khazelov and do you think his theory about 9/11 has merit?
Thanks. Ryan.
{Ed033's Note - i don't know but at the moment, i'm not into the nuclear weapons bit of Dimitri Khalezov's theory.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post
Log in or register to reply.
25 Sep 2014 11:39:04
poll question yes those involved (same old names crop up again "bush) etc)have got there way, it shows you how powerful the families are even in the 1930s when the president of the united states knows there is a plot and who is behind it but can not do anything about it.
How topical. Hmm yes, Bush, Morgan etc yes, now control the media, news, tv, film industries, the banking sector, overturned all the financial regulation, run the oil industry, arms industry, the cia. has to be a yes from me.
Mort
Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post
Log in or register to reply.
25 Sep 2014 11:26:52
was in my mums yesterday doing a bit of diy for her and she said "another bloody war "i reckon last year when Obama was ready to go into Syria because Assad was killing his people (cough)and Parliament voted no it meant Obama had to go it alone and I am guessing the american people are as much fed up as we are with this quest to dictate in the middle east as the money could be spent in our countries.
once the people made there feelings known, the Kabul had to use a different tactic, Que Isis they are conveniently in Syria and Obama and his middle east stooges are going to bomb Syria into the stone-age, I have no doubt Assad is a dictator like Saddam Hussein but so are the Saudis the only difference is they are pro united states also I have a gut feeling Assad was fighting Isis last year but we know how the media wheel works don't we?
No sensible person has an appetite for war.
The cartel was pushing for it, but Obama was outplayed by Putin who managed to keep America from interfering. Of course this has emboldened Putin to push his own agenda elsewhere.
The cartel didn't like being outplayed though and now we have this IS bunch.
I can see how they came along, there was a bit of a vacuum, and the Syrian opposition was a mixed bag but the timing is a little off.
Mort
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post
Log in or register to reply.
24 Sep 2014 20:45:54
whats the story about of mars y everyone going there
Mars non-natural artifact?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1ibaJ5hPog
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Is the first and second post by the same user?
If not, to OP what do you mean?
To the second poster, NASA always colors its footage so it all looks like dull deserts. That looks artificial as the shape is too complicated to be rock formation.
zari
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
The OP and the reply to it are different posters according to the IP addresses
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Op here just getting my mind opend. it started when I started reading this site livrpool pages found this page started to read everything on it a lot don't make sence but a lot dose iam starting to question everything I see on the news was just worndering what's the big thing with mars was there's something more than we are been told that's for sure
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
OP
Welcome to the site.
There's many theories about Mars, there's a suppossed base for the world elites for when it all goes boom on Earth for instance.
This site can get very confusing and it WILL make you question most things in life.
Stick with it and be prepared to keep an open mind and also be prepared to be called "A nutjob" by the people who are still sleeping.
Agree · 5 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post
Log in or register to reply.
24 Sep 2014 13:27:26
Not a conspiracy but I have found out today that Nigel Farage will be visiting my place of work tomorrow. Now I do not vote because I believe no matter who is in power those above them will always run the show. However I particularly despise UKIP and what they stand for.
I am hoping that this guy farage refrains from speaking to us workers as I will not be able to stop myself from voicing my opinion on him and his ideology but if I did would there be any grounds for dismissal?
{Ed033's Note - Don't take this as legal advice, but assuming you haven't just started your job and you're not on a trial period and you're an employee, then voicing your opinion in this instance is no grounds for dismissal. Obviously you wouldn't want to go as far as assault and or battery.
They'd have to be desperate to get rid of you if they did. All you would have to do then is take them to an industrial tribunal for unfair dismissal (might take a while to get a hearing), which is easier than you might think and 2 of the people on the tribunal tend to be more favourable to the employee than the employer anyway, all things being equal.
Although with a case like this (especially with co-workers as witnesses), you should easily win and then the employer would have to pay you for any lost wages (as though you had been working there) and reinstate you in your previous position or (if not possible) as similar as possible position, if you didn't have a new job somewhere else.
Why do you despise what UKIP stand for? Surely controlling immigration, leaving the EU (or NWO, as it is really known) and devolving powers is what we should do? I mean, it certainly corroborates with what the majority of you seem to want on here.
Besh
Agree · 4 · Disagree · 0
24 Sep 2014 21:31:26
Its their methods. Its all very well saying throw out immigrants and leave the eu, but if that doesn't solve the problem then what?
I'm not British, I wasn't born here, I don't have British citizenship, I have citizenship of an EU country and reside in this country because of this. I work in this country, I pay taxes in this country, one of my children was born in this country. But ukip would throw me out? I contribute more to this country than some of the indigenous population.
Certain parties always pop up in times of economic difficulty and target minorities.
Agree · 8 · Disagree · 0
Just because one shares a few specific views with someone else it does not mean they would want to be ruled by that someone.
zari
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
No that's not UKIP at all! If you actually read their policies, they only say they want to chuck out people who come to the UK to sponge of the state and use our NHS via health tourism. How is it fair that us taxpayers pay for the Latvian who probably killed Alice Gross to have care on our NHS? How was he even allowed in the country? Many more cases like this, that's what UKIP is against. Not people who contribute. Read their policies!
And one more thing - lots of people on here seem to hold Icke and Jones in high regard - Fararge has been guests on their respected shows before exposing the EU. So if he's good enough for them, why do you all see him as some antichrist?
Agree · 7 · Disagree · 0
Because icke holds court with farage over joining europe does not mean he agrees with ukip policies and the way the go about it, as for people who sponge of the country, if ukip included the monarchy and lords/peers and certain mp's then you can count me in.
Agree · 6 · Disagree · 0
Read all 10 replies
Reply to this post
Log in or register to reply.
24 Sep 2014 11:18:40
Poll of the day : without shadow of a doubt it was rigged. I posted on here in June my concerns that this was going to happen. I've posted a link below for your consideration. I was the 45% and will fight for independence till my last breath. We were robbed of our sovereign right to be independent.
http://www.storyleak.com/scottish-independence-vote-stolen-massive-coverup-ensues-usual-suspects-ided/
{Ed001's Note - if you look around the world, most countries have at least one region looking for independence, there was no way that the world's leaders could allow this vote to be a Yes. Catalans, Basques, Tamils etc etc would have all gained renewed hope in their quest for independence, if Scotland had voted Yes.}
I had a feeling there was something fishy going on, I think someone on here pointed out that it should not of been a anonymous vote, too easy to fix
Agree · 4 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post
Log in or register to reply.
