Talk Sense

Message from the editors

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

01 Jul 2013 21:55Discussion #10293Talk Sense

01 Jul 2013 22:38:21
Ed, what are your thoughts on the Royal Family? Other than sponging off the public, are they 'darker' than most people think? Thanks,

ConspiracyKen

{Ed033's Note - I think that royalty all of the earth have been into blood sacrifices for thousands of years, why would they suddenly stop?

frankyscouser02 Jul 2013 09:14

I think there is something evil about them, apart from the well known interbreeding there is something about them that creep me out and there is something satanic about the places they reside in, to me royalty represent the occult and that includes pedophilia which has been mentioned in the past and present and like edd mentioned blood sacrifices which will shock a few people but I think it still gets practiced, the monarchy in my lifetime are very rarely in the news for bad publicity apart from the Dianna Camilla Charles triangle then Dianna death and when that revolting Nazi sympathizer prince Phillip let's down there guard with he's quotes that the media just laugh off as prince Phillips sarcastic humor, like the famous quote " In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation" as you may gather I detest the monarchy and what it stands for.

Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered02 Jul 2013 09:14

Id be intrigued 2 see the blood type of the royals 2 see if there is a nephillim link.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

01 Jul 2013 21:20Discussion #10292Talk Sense

01 Jul 2013 21:14:53
Are the illuminati real? And who or what are they if so?.

{Ed033's Note - see if you can watch all 3 parts of Project Camelot Interviews Leo Zagami - Part 1 of 3

Reply to this post

01 Jul 2013 19:34Discussion #10291Talk Sense

01 Jul 2013 20:31:46
Video about Michael Hastings' death

Not Registered02 Jul 2013 08:40

Friends and family say he drives like a grandma, and he sends an email hours before his death mentioning his biggest story yet. I don't believe for one second this was an accident.

Ryan.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

01 Jul 2013 10:48Discussion #10290Talk Sense

01 Jul 2013 11:24:44
Hi Ed, what's with the 'Political Talk' being seperate to the 'Conspiracy Talk'?
I'd have thought, given the fact that governments are cotrolled by the NWO puppetmasters and the fact that western democracy just gives an illusion of choice, that politics is probably the biggest conspiracy of all. Just a thought ;-)

MrTrotskysGhost

{Ed033's Note - Yes, politics is a big conspiracy, the entertaining video What The FUQ shows part of this.

The politics site itself allows for people who couldn't bring themselves to visit a "conspiracy" site, to talk about things which require discussing and maybe they can learn a thing or two there as well, just like most of the regulars on here have learnt a few things, I would imagine.

Also, we have Ed052 on there that can bring another perpective to issues, being within politics to a degree and studying politics.

Not Registered01 Jul 2013 18:11

Thanks for the link Ed, interesting stuff

MrTrotskysGhost

{Ed033's Note - Ok, thanks

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

01 Jul 2013 08:14Discussion #10289Talk Sense

01 Jul 2013 00:01:41
Just a quick question, just want to ask the obvious at the end of the weekend but is the Pyramid symbolism of Glastonbury illuminati symbolism?
Or is it some sort of spiritual symbolism?

Supasub

frankyscouser01 Jul 2013 10:53

Yeah supasub noticed that a few years ago when coldplay were on, not really my subject this music and symbols, is Glastonbury on a spiritual site or something? will ask warrior to right a post on this, he is more clued in to this subject.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered01 Jul 2013 14:53

Yeah its next to the tor which is a big hill and a possible location of the holy grail.

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

30 Jun 2013 21:55Discussion #10288Talk Sense

30 Jun 2013 22:49:16
In response to Franky's post further down, the nameless family/ corpaoration is the Rothschild banking dynasty. Media will have you believe they went bankrupt but they had around $50 trillion in 1950, how do you lose that? You don't.

Rockefeller was always thought to be the richest man in the world but when he died it was revealed that he owned less than 20% of his companies, the rest belonging to the Rothschilds.

Bank of England, as well as other centralised banks (most of which set up by Amschel Rothschild's 5 sons), use recessions to generate even more wealth and therefore power for themselves. Remember, wealth is never lost and is only ever transferred.

Central banks have promised since their introduction to minimise ups and downs in the economy, yet that is all there has ever been!

Most of the public don't understand this though which brings me to a famous quote from George Orwell, "as society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it".

Vive la revolution!

ConspiracyKen

{Ed033's Note - I'm not convinced that the Rothschilds are at the top of the tree, and Frankyscouser appeared to be asking about those higher than Rothschild. I think all of the regulars on here know of the name Rothschild, but to me they are just minions to others higher up.

Not Registered01 Jul 2013 08:14

Totally agree ed! The rothschilds are just a wealthy family! Don't get me wrong I do think they have some say in what happens! Maybe could be classed as an elite! But we all know that there are powers above with a lot more power and wealth than all the word put together!
RR!

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered01 Jul 2013 08:17

Sorry Ed didn't mean to patronise. If you don't think Rothschild's are the most powerful, who do you think are really in power?

ConspiracyKen

{Ed033's Note - I don't know who's really in power.

Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0

frankyscouser01 Jul 2013 08:18

No doubt the Rothschild family are rich and powerful but I have always had a opinion that the most powerful figures are nameless.

Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0

gibsy2101 Jul 2013 09:06

The Rothchilds are not the ones at the top, sounds out there but I seriously belief the ones at the top are not human. i'm talking Archons.

There is a belief that low down in the deep web, underneath all the disgusting and scary stuff, you have an Archon interface which is only accessible through impossibly high level clearance etc.

Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0

frankyscouser01 Jul 2013 10:53

To regulars to this site and new followers what gibsy says will sound ridiculous and absurd but to me a higher intelligence pulls the strings, everyone assumes the richest is the real leader, I have not got a clue who or what is but it's evil.

Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0

Read all 6 replies

Reply to this post

30 Jun 2013 20:55Discussion #10287Talk Sense

30 Jun 2013 21:08:47
Hi ed and every body i've recently come across something called fema concentration camps that are in the usa now. What do people make of these concentration camps?

{Ed033's Note - Conspiracy Theory - Jesse Ventura - Police State FEMA Camps and Fusion Centers

Reply to this post

30 Jun 2013 03:46Discussion #9004Talk Sense

29 Jun 2013 22:04:24
more evidence of a pro active agenda to get children used to sex at a early age, a school wanted to show to a class of ten year olds, two adults having sex, then you have schools in germany that are teaching /learning how to masturbate, these authorities allowing this are the real pedophiles setting in motion that it all this is normal.

Not Registered30 Jun 2013 12:54

Don't get what you mean- sex is normal isn't it? Most theorists agree that teaching kids about sex early is the best way to avoid increased teenage pregnancies and STD's etc. Sex education in no way is encouraging paedophiles. If anything, it helps youngsters to grow up understanding what is acceptable and what isn't. They need to learn this stuff before they get access to pornsites on the net which will really warp their perspectives on sex.

Agree · 10 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered30 Jun 2013 13:24

Unfortunately Kids are able to access sites at such an early age that the need to teach them what is reality is very important.
Back in the day it was blue movies on your brothers VHS tapes and maybe a dirty mag you found now its everywhere and much more graphic.

Kopping a feel

Agree · 4 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered30 Jun 2013 16:33

I think you have got this wrong, Franky.
The sexualisation of our children is coming from the media and is not being dealt with by parents.
Look at the music industry, Beiber, in particular. There is someone, a near child himself, who has been marketed at 10-15yr old girls. Corporations selling sex to children is the only way you can describe that. Parents can choose to moniter their kids accessibility to such things but choose not to. If parents are not dealing with this properly and teaching their kids about this topic, the only place left to educate them in such matters is the schools. My brother-in-law is a primary school teacher and he says that the fellow teachers he has spoken to do not want to be teaching kids this stuff, it's a parents job.

The audio and visual bombardment of this generations children, from the media, celebrity and music industries, in particular, is where the blame should lie.

Jimi88

{Ed033's Note - As they control both the schools and the main stream media, I would say, they would use both the schooling system and the mainstream media to brainwash children into their agenda.

It appears that there is an agenda over the longer term to make pedophilia appear as 'normal' and so they would brainwash the children, seeing as you quite rightly pointed out that generally, parents aren't "dealing with this properly".

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

frankyscouser30 Jun 2013 17:05

Sex education fine at an appropriate age not ten years old and under and yes I agree kids can easily stumble on porn on the net, but showing nine and ten year olds two adults have full penetrative sex and the same thing with masturbation is way to young, and there motives I treat with suspicion.

Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered30 Jun 2013 19:41

What age would you say is right then? Because kids are accessing horrible stuff far younger. There was a case in our local primary school when 2 lads were caught with porn on their phones- they were 7. Attempting to show them what's normal is important, even if it seems too young to you and I think it's slightly ludicrous to suggest there's an agenda to promote paedophilia in this. Attitudes to that have got far stricter over the years.

Agree · 5 · Disagree · 0

Read all 11 replies

Reply to this post

30 Jun 2013 03:46Discussion #10286Talk Sense

29 Jun 2013 21:54:48
China have been building entire blocks in Africa, and I mean entire blocks! These ghost towns are a real mystery. Funny thing is, China have been arming groups on the continent, pirates etc.

South Africa will collapse and the Chinese will colonize, mark my words!

frankyscouser30 Jun 2013 12:17

Mate, china have ghost towns built all over china, there are a few reasons why they are doing this, one is they are the richest nation on earth but also know the debts that other countries owe them count for nothing if there other countries can't or won't pay them back so the wise thing is to build or buy all over the world, look at it on a smaller scale, you have a bit of money in a bank, do you you leave it in there doing nothing with the real possibility that it could get frozen or taxed or do you buy something that everybody needs like housing etc? I really do not think its a tactic to invade anyone, just they are in a strong position compared to most countries and because they are getting a good deal to boot.

{Ed033's Note - At some point in the future, China will want to expand out of China, parts of Africa would be a possibility

Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered30 Jun 2013 19:41

Migration is seeing many populous nations move elsewhere. This is nothing new. I fear China much less than I fear the UK govt. right now.

Agree · 4 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

29 Jun 2013 13:54Discussion #10285Talk Sense

29 Jun 2013 14:38:10
If ever proof were needed that we are being taken for mugs it has arrived. Quite apart from the ridiculous cost of paying for their wedding, in the middle of a period of austerity, another Â£1m was spent on 'preparing' a house for two more royal parasites. Just why are we paying for this? If the queen gets over Â£30m per year why did she not foot the bill? If, as we are constantly told, she is feeling the pinch sell some of her numerous paintings or property. When will people wake up to the fact that these people do not care about anyone but themselves. Every halfwit who waves a flag at a wedding or some other waste of money ceremony needs electro shocked into reality. How many palaces, how many jewels and just how much is her art collection worth? Yet still she has the cheek to take more from taxpayers.

frankyscouser29 Jun 2013 16:53

Could not agree more mate, it turns out the royal family descended from Dracula{Vlad the impaler}and Illuminati founder Weishaupt's sugar daddy (Duke Saxe-Gotha) its on dispatchers 8pm monday says tony gosling.

Agree · 4 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered29 Jun 2013 16:53

Yea I laughed other day when news was on they said about the increase in sovereign payment but when on to stress how frugal the queen was and how she looked after the finances, if she was that worried she could sell 1 piece a year of her vast jewellery or art collection most of that stuff is near priceless it's worth so much, royals have pulled master stroke of keeping power and money but people think they defunct, why does the priminister have to go there every week to update a so called powerless figure head? It's not like he has nothing else to do, always found it strange it's never commented on

Agree · 8 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered29 Jun 2013 18:58

Yea definitely the people have been robbed blind and fooled on scale too big to comprehend monarchy realised long before anyone else it would be easier to pull strings from the background than worry about running country day to day it works even better now that they have the media to falsely reinforce the perception this is very much a multilayered society with a super elite we know virtually nothing about except they rob us blind and even that they have covered up fantastically, always remember watching clip from House of Lords where lord blackheath says a group was willing to wipe out uk debit but it want to talk to someone in uk of top 6 security clearance in the world, which in itself is an amazing statement. Top 6 in world and if there is a top six who where the group that had more money than them? We can only ever guess this lot have far too much power for us to ever scratch the surface their identity or intent

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered30 Jun 2013 03:46

The i'm convinced that all the western leaders are related, even the most powerful working class are not innocent. Bloodlines are the key 2 all our conspiracy theories imo.

Food 4 thought, you know Cherie Blair?. well in her bloodline there is an interesting freemason, called John Wilks Booth. the guy who shot Abraham Lincoln. there are strange coincidences.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

frankyscouser30 Jun 2013 12:17

You are right the bloodlines are the most important thing, every american president in history are related to each other including the opposition.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

29 Jun 2013 11:01Discussion #10284Talk Sense

29 Jun 2013 11:13:28
Dr Richard Sauder - A Message For Humanity 2 hour radio interview
pea

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjAr9thvf4I

Reply to this post

29 Jun 2013 09:51Discussion #9003Talk Sense

29 Jun 2013 10:10:22
so the royals granted a new right of secrecy and do not be fooled it is all about fiances, but for the time being I will just mention the finances, kate and wills pad a million pound makeover, in 2005 the queen asks for a heating grant I could list many more but the whole point is in the future if we as the people want to know what the monarchy have fleeced off the uk we will get told its none of our business and I think because we are in a bad state for the next few years, the monarchy do not want to upset the people with what they are claiming for in case there is a revolt.

Now this also means negative stories about the monarchy (not that the media would put them out anyway) for instance we know prince 'dodge the coffin' Phillip is a well know Nazi sympathizer, earl Mountbatten was in to kids and a well known homosexual, they hire known pedophiles in estates all around the uk, this is not news, it is just not publicized by the media for a reason, to keep us blind and dumb, if we do not demand more from our elected politicians we will be none the wiser than our ancestors hundreds of years ago.

{Ed033's Note - Whether they know it or not, the elected politicians actually work for a company that has shareholders (We know that company as 'United Kingdom'). Those shareholders come first and the people come no where. Through mainstream media brainwashing, they keep the people in a 'comfortable' mindset.

Not Registered29 Jun 2013 10:53

29 jun 2013 11:21:44
i'd just like to verify what franky is saying, that he is right. they operate above and beyond the law. in fact, it occurs to me that the whole system is in place to facilitate the very things it pretends to be against.
p.s. the peasants are revolting, franky. ain't it funny. pea

Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered29 Jun 2013 12:13

The UK is a supposed democratic society yet our Head of State is unelected, sums up the Royal family ~ Mrs E

{Ed033's Note - You can probably imagine that our translation of the word 'democracy' and the elite's translation of the word 'democracy' is different.

How about if their translation is something along the lines of, 'We say, you do'.

Agree · 3 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered29 Jun 2013 12:24

Ed033 are you able to elaborate of this shareholder system? I imagine it runs across most of the worlds governments, but would it be safe to say the majority share is held by the centralised banking sector?

Can you see a way that the masses can be educated on who actually owns the governments, or is the media control far too strong?

My problem with a revolt pea is that these people control everything. Following on from Frankys post below, they can shut down civilisation with the flick of a switch and remove technology from the public. This would effect everything from water, gas and power. The problem I see with the masses working out what is really happening, is that when they do, they will be punished accordingly.

Melbourne CFC

{Ed033's Note - Yes, it's all over the world and it's the real meaning of bringing "democracy" to a country. There is an entertaining video that can explain it very well

Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0

frankyscouser29 Jun 2013 12:24

Pea with the austerity coming in they really do not want to p--- off the people and let the people know what they are getting, even when the well off start feeling the pinch, watch the worm turn.

{Ed033's Note - The middle class haven't even opened one eyelid to take a look yet.

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Not Registered29 Jun 2013 13:09

29 Jun 2013 13:57:18
I agree with you, but the point I was making was a joke (not my humour, but the humour of 'elites' if you like, who do laugh at us. As ed033 observes, they have different interpretations of words from us) i. e. revolting peasants/unwashed masses, see?

To answer your question; It's more a question of what we SHOULDN'T be doing, rather than what we SHOULD.
What shouldn't we do? Participate.
In order for the system to operate, your participation is required, and likewise if we don't participate, it won't be able to operate.

John Trudell addresses this matter very well in the link here:
John Trudell - I'm Crazy? www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctUecTdPEO0

Also, I can't recommend enough that people listen to Richard Sauder's message linked in the other post above. pea

Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0

Read all 9 replies

Reply to this post

Talk Sense

Create a new post

Create New Post