Latest replies

Reply · RoscoJEF · 28 Sep 2015 21:33
28 Sep 2015 22:32:16
I was about 11 when Oliver stones JFK came out and I've been gripped since ( I'm 35 now) and then the x files came out and I've been hooked on conspiracies since then.
The greatest story never told was a real eye opener would recommend to anyone.

Dylan Avery and Michael Moores documentarys on 911 opened my eyes on it, bit dated now seeing as there's been a lot out since then but in 2003-4 that was all we had to go on.
Read discussion
Reply · RoscoJEF · 28 Sep 2015 21:32
28 Sep 2015 22:25:20
This announcement on the week when Matt Damon's new movie The Martian comes out. Perfectly timed.
Read discussion
Reply · TTTS · 28 Sep 2015 21:24
28 Sep 2015 21:32:25
Just like the west and their Saudi, Israeli interests.
It is nothing to do with human rights Kim, more to do with the fact Syria was debt free, self sufficient and free of the Rothschild yoke. As was Libya before it was unceremoniously invaded by the dark side.
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 28 Sep 2015 21:24
28 Sep 2015 22:16:56
a devils advocate question kim.
do the west take out Assad like they took out Saddam Hussein and leave Syria in chaos like Iraq?
Read discussion
Reply · HoneyBadger · 28 Sep 2015 21:24
28 Sep 2015 21:14:32
Exactly the same as you mate;
Found the site from the footy site
Have always had a cynical mind especially about 9/11 but I thought the poster's here were crazy initially
Then I did some research and now I think everyone else is crazy!

That Hitler documentary is excellent, opened my mind a lot.
Read discussion
Reply · KimPhilby · 28 Sep 2015 20:09
28 Sep 2015 20:56:41
Putins trying to protect one of his biggest clients who happens to be one of the largest dictators in the region. A mass murderer. I agree we all need to work together to stabilise the region. But Assad isn't part of the solution.
Read discussion
Reply · sidneythecat · 28 Sep 2015 18:41
28 Sep 2015 18:39:55
Very interesting Franky. I did enjoy and took in what you said.

Thank you.
Read discussion
Reply · frankyscouser · 28 Sep 2015 14:17
28 Sep 2015 14:54:04
first of all thanks Ed033 for the work you put in putting it all together and the images fitted very nicely.

cheers guys for the feedback, i will be looking to do some more podcasts in the future. i have a few ideas about interviewing guests from this site and social media sites, so watch this space.

and yes jonesy sounds a great idea, i would love to hear other regulars podcast bios.

thanks again franky.
Read discussion
Reply · MrJonesy · 28 Sep 2015 13:04
28 Sep 2015 13:42:06
Brilliant man! great listen, think more of us should get involved in this podcasting and hope to hear more from you Franky. can't be a bad thing spreading our voices to try and "wake up" as many as possible
Read discussion
Reply · KimPhilby · 28 Sep 2015 12:07
28 Sep 2015 12:43:48
Yes, the soviets had their own version of paperclip. Not to mention various assets in the American programs.
Read discussion
Reply · zari · 28 Sep 2015 10:32
28 Sep 2015 11:18:52
"Operation paperclip" was the name of the initiative which aimed to capture and relocate scientists from Nazi Germany to the USA. They also acquired and transported technologies, prototypes and designs, though the official coverup stated that they were going after works of art. It unofficially began in 1945.

If one delves into the technologies the Germans were researching at the time and takes into account that in the 60 years since then those areas of applied sciences have not been publicly developed, one reaches the logical conclusion that they are now either black budget projects or have been continued by the industrial arm of the military industrial complex.
From the scant available information we assume that both the USA air-force and their navy run parallel research projects for a while but at some point they all came under the jurisdiction of the air-force, probably as an attempt to limit the leaks to the public.

We further assume that with the strengthening of the industry's position in the USA since the 1980s that the majority of these research projects have passed to the private sector (Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Siemens etc.).

From those first allied reports on "foo-fighters" and the information on the "bell project" which entered public domain one could safely assume that some projects had already yielded results. Any government would continue that research especially when taking into account the vast superiority of 'anti-gravitic' technology and signal resonance as compared to their conventional counterparts, jet propulsion and matter acceleration.

Though there is little proof of it, the gradual increase in UFO sightings reported since those early days, accompanied by witness reports which indicate that UFO designs have increased in complexity and size, hint at a continuation of those research programs. Lastly, the fact that differently shaped UFOs have been sighted over different countries, namely the USA and Russia, would indicate that more than one country is in possession of these technologies.
Read discussion
Reply · RoscoJEF · 28 Sep 2015 10:03
28 Sep 2015 10:45:22
That was great Frankie. Very similar reasons to me. I might add apart from experiencing a UFO, once saw which could be best described as a grim reaper type figure walking in the cemetery and then disappeared behind a grave stone. My dad was with me and when I said I think I saw something he described the same thing to me. Never believed in paranormal until then and now I wouldn't dispute anyone if they encounter something themselves.

keep them coming

RoscoJef
Read discussion
Reply · zari · 28 Sep 2015 09:22
28 Sep 2015 10:14:00
Battle tactics is not something the establishment would wish to accurately analyze for the purpose of teaching their troops. I'm not talking just about the USA here.

The military teaches limited tactical variability under hierarchical departmentalization in order for their troops to only be operational while executing orders. Like the slaves troops of old their purposefully low battle efficiency serves their masters in case they eventually decide to question their orders and set their own path.

In guerilla warfare small independent groups identify their own targets and execute their own missions without any need for oversight. They do not rely on technology which makes them hard to locate, the little equipment they rely on allows them maneuverability and a much larger area of action, they are not taught to protect assets and preserve structures so they are mostly unpredictable.

If all troops were trained in guerilla tactics when they returned home from offensive wars and eventually reflected on their actions and the motives of those who were issuing their orders, they would turn against their governments with devastating results.
Read discussion
Reply · Hazard54 · 28 Sep 2015 08:37
28 Sep 2015 09:21:07
Enjoyed it too! Apart from the accent ;)

Only joking mate! Keep them coming :)
Read discussion
Reply · xXJediXx · 28 Sep 2015 06:54
28 Sep 2015 07:51:59
I enjoyed that frankie. Keep them coming .

Thanks
Read discussion
Reply · KimPhilby · 27 Sep 2015 22:05
27 Sep 2015 22:45:52
Its the whole thing of as soon as they hit trouble they dig in to return fire but then become static and pinned down. Like in black hawk down. The British army is trained to find the weak point and force their way through. The Russian army just takes it head on takes the casualties and forces their way through. The Americans by going static invited more casualties. Bad tactical doctrine.
Read discussion
Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Posts appear after editor approval.