Big Al’s profile

17 Dec 2015 13:45:12
Correct me if I'm wrong but any children she had outside of her marriage wouldn't have been in line?

I think it was more what she knew, who she seeing, and the threat of her talking.

17 Dec 2015 12:14:50
the only question that should be asked is who gained from here death?
once you figure that out then it will all makes sense.
Below is a documentary about Princess Diana.

04 Dec 2015 12:02:30
Left me with a lump in my throat.

07 Oct 2015 19:20:22
Of course I forgot north Korea lol.

07 Oct 2015 19:02:46
I rememeber hearing somewhere the only countries Rothschild didn't control bank was was Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran.

Is that right?

07 Oct 2015 17:54:20
9/11 was a fake terror attack used to justify military action in the middle east. Western governments are controlled by powerful international interests who stand to benefit from this military action (through oil, other resources, strategic geographic positioning causing never-ending wars etc). So it may be a bit simplistic to label the event as an 'inside job' however there would certainly have been groups or individuals within the US establishment who were involved or compliant, under the orders of their internationalist superiors.

Theres loads of smoking gun evidence which disproves the official narrative, too much to mention all in one place, but for instance:
1. Plane wings don't slice through structural steel
2. Jet fuel does not burn at a high enough heat to manipulate the structural steel to cause a collapse, let alone within the witnessed time frame
3. The collapse of the towers at free fall speed defies basic physics and can only be explained logically by some form of controlled demolition. And the collapse of tower 7 which wasn't even hit defies any practical logic
4. The fact that the supposed pilots were amateurs, had never been inside a cockpit of the model of jet used and could certainly not have pulled off the tricky manoeuvres (especially at the pentagon) at the stated speeds
5. The speeds given that the jets were travelling at in any case were beyond that which those models are designed to travel at near ground level, which would have meant danger of the planes being damaged well before impact let alone making it nigh on impossible for them to be flown accurately
6. The lack of debris first witnessed at the pentagon and total lack of any signs of a plane at the supposed crash site of flight 93
7. The witness accounts that what flew into the pentagon resembled a 'missile' or 'missile with no wings'
8. The fact that cctv footage from local businesses (which would surely give a clear view of a huge jet flying low then into the pentagon) was confiscated and has never been made public

I could go on all day, in fact I'm shocked at how many holes there are in the official version. Were they testing how easy it is to fool us?

The best documentary I have seen on the subject is called 'september 11 the new pearl harbour' and is available on youtube. I always recommend it to people who want to learn more about 9/11.

september 11 the new pearl harbour
youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M

07 Oct 2015 18:23:29
It has to be a inside job AL, it's laughable when the story we were told becomes the hardest to believe now.