07 Oct 2015 13:51:54
The worst and most corrupt government is the American.
Ed033, what's your thoughts on 911? I've done research for years in it and believe it was an inside job
{Ed033's Note - What else can it be?
9/11 can be split into 3 parts. Pentagon, Shanksville and Manhattan.
i think we can explain how the Pentagon and Shanksville attacks took place but Manhattan is difficult to work out.
1. How the The Pentagon attack was carried out:
This is the best and most comprehensive presentation on what really happened concerning the 9/11 Pentagon Attack
Barbara Honegger - Behind the Smoke Curtain presentation length: 3 hours (but it's definitely worth watching)
youtube.com/watch?v=4fvJ8nFa5Qk
2. How the Shanksville crater was probably made (8 minutes long video):
youtube.com/watch?v=MQTNy6Jb26A
3. Manhattan
i believe that black technology was used on 9/11 and that's why we can't get to the bottom of what happened.
i think they had to use black technology to turn the towers into dust because as the towers are/were built on an artificial basin (known as 'The Bath Tub'), it meant that if they performed a usual demolition, they risked the artificial basin cracking under the force of the demolitions, which could have flooded the whole of Manhattan (which the seem to have wanted to avoid).
The other problem we have with 9/11 is that aluminium plane wings cannot slice through steel and Boeing 767s cannot fly at 500 mph near the ground. Only a military missile can fly at that speed at ground level. But how do you get a military missile to look like a Boeing 767?
2 impossibilities about the one of the 9/11 planes (2 minute video)
youtube.com/watch?v=P3NtaDC_ZEo
But if you watch the above 2 minute video, you might believe that the plane was a CGI graphic but Richard D. Hall did some excellent work to show that CGI could not have been used if you watch the below 22 minute video.
9/11 can be split into 3 parts. Pentagon, Shanksville and Manhattan.
i think we can explain how the Pentagon and Shanksville attacks took place but Manhattan is difficult to work out.
1. How the The Pentagon attack was carried out:
This is the best and most comprehensive presentation on what really happened concerning the 9/11 Pentagon Attack
Barbara Honegger - Behind the Smoke Curtain presentation length: 3 hours (but it's definitely worth watching)
youtube.com/watch?v=4fvJ8nFa5Qk
2. How the Shanksville crater was probably made (8 minutes long video):
youtube.com/watch?v=MQTNy6Jb26A
3. Manhattan
i believe that black technology was used on 9/11 and that's why we can't get to the bottom of what happened.
i think they had to use black technology to turn the towers into dust because as the towers are/were built on an artificial basin (known as 'The Bath Tub'), it meant that if they performed a usual demolition, they risked the artificial basin cracking under the force of the demolitions, which could have flooded the whole of Manhattan (which the seem to have wanted to avoid).
The other problem we have with 9/11 is that aluminium plane wings cannot slice through steel and Boeing 767s cannot fly at 500 mph near the ground. Only a military missile can fly at that speed at ground level. But how do you get a military missile to look like a Boeing 767?
2 impossibilities about the one of the 9/11 planes (2 minute video)
youtube.com/watch?v=P3NtaDC_ZEo
But if you watch the above 2 minute video, you might believe that the plane was a CGI graphic but Richard D. Hall did some excellent work to show that CGI could not have been used if you watch the below 22 minute video.
07 Oct 2015 18:23:29
It has to be a inside job AL, it's laughable when the story we were told becomes the hardest to believe now.
It has to be a inside job AL, it's laughable when the story we were told becomes the hardest to believe now.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
07 Oct 2015 17:54:20
9/11 was a fake terror attack used to justify military action in the middle east. Western governments are controlled by powerful international interests who stand to benefit from this military action (through oil, other resources, strategic geographic positioning causing never-ending wars etc). So it may be a bit simplistic to label the event as an 'inside job' however there would certainly have been groups or individuals within the US establishment who were involved or compliant, under the orders of their internationalist superiors.
Theres loads of smoking gun evidence which disproves the official narrative, too much to mention all in one place, but for instance:
1. Plane wings don't slice through structural steel
2. Jet fuel does not burn at a high enough heat to manipulate the structural steel to cause a collapse, let alone within the witnessed time frame
3. The collapse of the towers at free fall speed defies basic physics and can only be explained logically by some form of controlled demolition. And the collapse of tower 7 which wasn't even hit defies any practical logic
4. The fact that the supposed pilots were amateurs, had never been inside a cockpit of the model of jet used and could certainly not have pulled off the tricky manoeuvres (especially at the pentagon) at the stated speeds
5. The speeds given that the jets were travelling at in any case were beyond that which those models are designed to travel at near ground level, which would have meant danger of the planes being damaged well before impact let alone making it nigh on impossible for them to be flown accurately
6. The lack of debris first witnessed at the pentagon and total lack of any signs of a plane at the supposed crash site of flight 93
7. The witness accounts that what flew into the pentagon resembled a 'missile' or 'missile with no wings'
8. The fact that cctv footage from local businesses (which would surely give a clear view of a huge jet flying low then into the pentagon) was confiscated and has never been made public
I could go on all day, in fact I'm shocked at how many holes there are in the official version. Were they testing how easy it is to fool us?
The best documentary I have seen on the subject is called 'september 11 the new pearl harbour' and is available on youtube. I always recommend it to people who want to learn more about 9/11.
september 11 the new pearl harbour
youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M
9/11 was a fake terror attack used to justify military action in the middle east. Western governments are controlled by powerful international interests who stand to benefit from this military action (through oil, other resources, strategic geographic positioning causing never-ending wars etc). So it may be a bit simplistic to label the event as an 'inside job' however there would certainly have been groups or individuals within the US establishment who were involved or compliant, under the orders of their internationalist superiors.
Theres loads of smoking gun evidence which disproves the official narrative, too much to mention all in one place, but for instance:
1. Plane wings don't slice through structural steel
2. Jet fuel does not burn at a high enough heat to manipulate the structural steel to cause a collapse, let alone within the witnessed time frame
3. The collapse of the towers at free fall speed defies basic physics and can only be explained logically by some form of controlled demolition. And the collapse of tower 7 which wasn't even hit defies any practical logic
4. The fact that the supposed pilots were amateurs, had never been inside a cockpit of the model of jet used and could certainly not have pulled off the tricky manoeuvres (especially at the pentagon) at the stated speeds
5. The speeds given that the jets were travelling at in any case were beyond that which those models are designed to travel at near ground level, which would have meant danger of the planes being damaged well before impact let alone making it nigh on impossible for them to be flown accurately
6. The lack of debris first witnessed at the pentagon and total lack of any signs of a plane at the supposed crash site of flight 93
7. The witness accounts that what flew into the pentagon resembled a 'missile' or 'missile with no wings'
8. The fact that cctv footage from local businesses (which would surely give a clear view of a huge jet flying low then into the pentagon) was confiscated and has never been made public
I could go on all day, in fact I'm shocked at how many holes there are in the official version. Were they testing how easy it is to fool us?
The best documentary I have seen on the subject is called 'september 11 the new pearl harbour' and is available on youtube. I always recommend it to people who want to learn more about 9/11.
september 11 the new pearl harbour
youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
07 Oct 2015 19:02:46
I rememeber hearing somewhere the only countries Rothschild didn't control bank was was Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran.
Is that right?
I rememeber hearing somewhere the only countries Rothschild didn't control bank was was Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran.
Is that right?
{Ed033's Note - yes, plus Cuba and North Korea, apparently
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
07 Oct 2015 19:20:22
Of course I forgot north Korea lol.
Of course I forgot north Korea lol.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0