26 Feb 2020 18:23:23 Perhaps (hopefully) you are correct, Rian. I am not at the forefront of viral research so it would be impossible to know what is actually possible.
I don't know how advanced nanotech is but I am aware of the studies/ research of using nanobots to destroy cancerous cells whilst ignoring healthy cells. This would mean the ability to program something so small you could have trillions injected into you and you wouldn't even know.
We know the MS never tell us the 'real' truth and, like I said, I am just trying to figure things out. Maybe it is all as they say (I very much doubt that, though) and it is an inevitable outcome of 'micro evolution'.
One thing we can be sure on though, is that no crisis will go to waste.
"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before. "
26 Feb 2020 17:13:19 Duccablue, You asked why we can't see stars on the videos shot in space.
This was NASA's first attempt at filming the stars. After seeing this, that was a completely laughable attempt at showing stars, it seems they just don't bother trying to show them at all anymore.
"Stargazer" balloon launch.
There is some confusion though with astronauts and 'experts', as to whether you can actually see stars in space, or not?
25 Feb 2020 23:11:01 Not if all the people 'they' wanted to be immune had, had an anti-vaccine. Either knowingly or unknowingly. Not too much of a stretch of the imagination.
25 Feb 2020 08:04:26 I did mention Italy but deleted that part to make a point more obvious, I guess.
As for cherry picking, that's exactly what I have had to do. If I put down all the 'facts' I have seen but can not prove (pretty much all the news we are getting) it would make one hell of a nightmarish read and I am guessing Ed wouldn't post it.
The MS and Independent (individuals, not the newspaper) news coming in from all countries, varies wildly. And it is extremely difficult to know what the actual truth of the matter, is.
The problem I have is that SARS Ebola and Covid-19 have all been reported to have come from animals (camels, monkeys, snakes, pangolin) but there has never been any proof of this. But its always the narrative.
I guess if I am honest, it's starting to worry me a tad, and I just wanted some perspective from Ed and fellow posters.
I apologise if it appeared that I am trying to twist this into a conspiracy by omitting certain things. This was never my angle, I am just trying to figure it all out.
24 Feb 2020 19:17:02 Haha, subjective gravity. Don't give 'them' ideas, Ed.
The Michelson-Morley experiment explanation is a joke.
Actually, the same person I spoke to about the vacuum / pressurised atmosphere, I explained the M-M experiment to them. They looked perplexed. Not from the fact they didn't understand what I had explained. More the fact they couldn't compute what the experiment concludes because it goes against their programming.
It's frustrating not being able to talk to intellectuals that are boxed in by MSBS thought.
But it's great when you see you have got through to them, on some level.
24 Feb 2020 17:20:56 I really can not get my head around how a pressurised atmosphere and a vacuum can sit side by side with no barrier separating them. It just wouldn't work.
I have had discussions where people argue that the air thins and gradually turns to a vacuum, all held in place by gravity.
If gravity was holding the air in place, how is it we get different layers of clouds moving in different direction?
23 Feb 2020 22:02:52 I did think it would be a big step watching this, for someone that hadn't look into Our ancient petrified past before. But hoped it would spark a few to think about it. As you say, this is obviously petrified biological matter.
I don't believe he is nuts. But I suspect the people who do, think the same about us, Ed, and are probably on the wrong page.
24 Feb 2020 00:24:42 "Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. " - Nikola Tesla.
24 Feb 2020 00:21:37 I may not be right, Southampton, but I think you are incorrect. Sorry :)
A rocket is basically a controlled explosion over a period of time.
To me the force is happening inside the rocket as the fuel escapes, it doesn't need the escaping fuel to push on something to make it move because there are internal forces at play, which make the rocket move.
Remember that we are told space is a vacuum. A vacuum will not hinder the result of internal forces and this will create a directional movement directly related to where the force originated. Therefor a controlled forward movement in relation to a rocket.
23 Feb 2020 18:21:53 I found the original footage interview to try and see if the translation is right. YT's translator just starts to spurt out random words because there is Russian being translated into Hungarian and vice-versa. None of it made sense. The word space did pop up though. haha
I was going to give up then I saw a comment from a Hungarian who went on to translate the interview. I have know idea if it is correct, but what is said I felt worthy of passing on.
Translation comment form YT:
"The more I listen to it, the more it is indeed like he is trying to subtly say he wasn't been into space. The interviewer last minutes as finale asks him whether he believes in aliens (22 25 min) and he responds "What does it mean whether I believe? They just exist. And by the way our aryan civilization is the only one who came to Earth from outer space". Then the interviewer says "In this train of thought, maybe when you were in space, extrodinary things have happened! " on which the austronaut answers (23 02 min) "How could I know? Might have happened, but no one said anything to me. "
After this the interviewer says "Igor Petrovich, there seem to be some kind of stange code between all austronauts to not speak on this topic very openly. " on which he responds (23 24 min) "No, nothing like that. We just do not have the time. Everything I know I am ready to say in the next 30 minutes if I need to".
The interviewer then says "Since we do not have 30 more minutes, I will leave this door wide open, and I want to thank you that you admitted the existence of alien life form, after all you are hero of Solviet Union and we can trust you! "
On which he in closing words says a bit nerviously "Look, I said the code of honor isn't stopping the austronauts from talking about what is happening in space. They just do not know. In fact we haven't been into space. If anyone says otherwise it is not true. "
23 Feb 2020 18:06:46 If what Gunnar Heinsohn said is true, which considering him being a professor emeritus of University of Bremen, is very likely. Then it makes perfect sense to me.
It's a simple concept but the fact that these layers are on the same level, says everything. Then you have the buildings / art etc all looking the same.
What is it they are so scared of people knowing by adding in seven centuries? . Or is it something to do with hiding the true date?
Its a shame Gunnar didn't release some books in English. His concept is straightforward, easy to understand and research compared to the crazy complex studies of Fomenko.
There doesn't appear to be anything more in English from Gunnar either in video or book, but if you happen to see anymore, I'd be interested to watch / read.
I guess I could try and find a PDF of one of his books and use Google translator.
Southern Monkey · 26 Feb 2020 18:20