Supasub’s profile

19 Sep 2014 15:40:44
Put my point on the wrong thread so I will bring it to the top:

Would the vote have been "rigged" had there been a yes vote franky? The fact that it seemed like more "yes" on social media sites only suggests that those people would vote in that way and to suggest social media sites represents a general view is wrong. Most middle aged and older businessmen & women I know don't even really use social media and they are more likely the ones who would vote no. I doubt all the farmers, landlords, old school business men & women of Scotland would use social media sites. Many people wouldn't say how they vote because of ridicule and reprisals too. I'm English and half swedish with some irish and Scottish blood chucked as have most of us I expect but either way had Scotland voted yes I wouldn't have been that bothered but I am of the belief that things are better off more together than apart. I don't understand how easily some people bought into the fact that just swapping one government for another would make the people of Scotland have any more honesty and power and less of a self serving government than they have now. I'm happy that Scotland is still with us, not for any reason, I just think it's better for all. Now one thing that does remain and is now enhanced is yes or no, Scotland is almost split down the middle which won't help to be honest and this will rumble on. On a slightly different note why is it that most english people I know generally in sport myself included would either want one of the home country's, (Wales, Scotland, ni) to beat another team/country unless our own, or not be bothered. But when it comes to many Scots in my experience they would support amy other team against England, I suppose backed up by a general dislike, resentment or even hatred against the English. Is this also directed at Wales and n. I. or just the English? I know it's historical but is it just because of things before all our lifetimes as there is nothing I can think of in the last few generations? It's not even as if English people I know think they are above Scotland or anyone else, far from it. And in my own opinion it came across to me as one of the most democratic votes I've experienced in my lifetime. Even the votes that didn't count and we're fairly insignificant were broken down to the vote and reasons given why. I don't think you could get any more of a fairer vote any where in the world which is I believe a good thing.

15 Aug 2014 15:39:30
Funnily enough I was thinking the exact same thing about bale when I saw a picture of him recently. Ronaldo has Definately bulked up since being at madrid. I have suspicions about all top level leagues but Definately Spain, Italy and even Germany as I think doping is possibly more accepted in those countries for example but not spoken about. It just goes on under the surface. It's also noticeable that since guardiola left barca suddenly and the timing of the whole fuentes/Armstrong scandal that Barca's energy levels are not as high in the last season or so compared to previous. I think you will see a rapid decline in messi's level of performance as even at his young age as there are rumours now that his body is now riddled with the after effects of doping/hgh.

23 Jul 2014 22:07:48
Looks like an interesting programme starting on more 4. Nevada triangle.

02 May 2014 20:55:14
Hi Ed, thought I'd bring subject to the top again as I want people to realise what type of company they are:
I think I should add my bit as I was part of Subway for 8 years hence my name. Someone I know (not a muslim) converted an average performing subway store to a Halal store a couple of years ago in not particularly a heavy muslim area. I'm not sure if it did much better but he did have to have the entire shop cleaned immaculately (and I'm not talking about a wipe round) then it had to be blessed to even be considered to qualify as a halal store. Subway will do anything directed by the American office to increase revenue (not profit) as it makes its money regardless from franchisees royalties wether they are making money or not, (nearly every subway store in the world is franchisee owned opposed to other companies, which is not great for franchisee's).
They are a typical pyramid and I have seen friends lose nearly everything if not everything surrounding vat and the "pasty tax" (which was introduced because of subway) because of their negligence and disregard for franchisee's. What has escaped the media is that Subway operate a similar tax avoidance scheme to starbucks and whoever else was in the news a couple of years ago through paying royalties to Holland then to Lichtenstein onto curucao ( dutch Caribbean I think) then I think onto America. Still don't know how it's remained the same. There is a lot more I can tell about withdrawn meats and products but I'm angry now and will carry on another time. Awful company.

Supasub

13 Sep 2013 11:40:52
Just got back from my hols a week ago and felt the need to post on my visit to Disney land, florida. My wife and kids particularly wanted to go there and it's difficult for me to say to them lokk at that symbol blah, blah. Since coming on this site and learning about what is potentially going on I could'nt help but see some things there in a different light. They've wasted not time in their purchase of Lucas/star wars to now have very obvious pyramid symbolism with their new "star tours" area/ride. Can anyone say if George Lucas had any links regarding the star wars movies or is this something new since its been taken under disneys wing as I've never noticed it before. I also re-thought about the whole "monsters inc" film which was one of my favourite animated children films. Consider 2 male "monsters" one with horns the other with 1 eye getting emotionally attached to a young female child after the child learns that's it's ok to go through different "doors".
They then are reluctant to hand the child back all the while this child is lead to believe she is in a very safe environment. I have started to think there is a very dark undertone to the film which is a shame. Not to mention the big letter M with a single eye on it. M being a significant letter to some as it's the 13th in the alphabet maybe as significant as the M in mcdonalds whose owner had shadowy links. Does anybody remember when monsters inc came out as I think it would have still been just Pixar. Did Pixar have some shadowy links to anyone previously? Is it just me or has anyone else noticed this about this particular film? I haven't seen the new one but I know my kids have but at the same time it's almost impossible for me to subtly suggest it may not be a good film to watch.
Not to mention then going to Kennedy space centre and learning that they are developing a new launch system called SLS which should be able to transport something not only into space and say the moon but also to another destination or 2 after that which then got me thinking about the potential for a breakaway civilisation. It's being developed by none other that Lockeed who if I'm right in thinking have a clear (well to me now anyway) freemasonry or pentagram logo depending on how you look at it. Don't get me wrong I still had a great time doing other stuff and being with the family but felt myself analysing a lot of the details. Sometimes it would be easier to be ignorant and not know what you see.
Going back to Disney, it must be owned by so many different shareholders that how is there potentially someone within the organisation still potentially putting these things in films and logo's? Who would it be? Sorry for the slightly rambling post but feeling a bit hungover and wanted to get it out my system as it's a bit tricky to talk to the wife in depth sometimes about this sort of thing.