Talk Sense

Message from the editors

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

19 Nov 2011 10:34Discussion #520Talk Sense

19 Nov 2011 11:34:14
german market in birmingham illuminat everywhere. Carved pyramid and oberlisk crystals. Wooden owls. Cuddly owls.

19 Nov 2011 15:54

Where in birmingham? i was around the bullring all day today, didnt notice anything

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

19 Nov 2011 16:42

In Vicky square mate, had to pop to the bullring for a bit.

Loads of stalls selling handmade German wares, carved wooden owls, soft cuddly owls, crystals in the shape of pyramids and obelisks.

Good day but the drunks were starting to come out in force.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

22 Nov 2011 14:06

I am tempted to say this is slightly daft but I wasn't there to be fair. All I will say is that just because something is in the shape of an obelisk doesn't mean it is Illuminati. AT the end of the day all crystals form obelisk shapes, it is the most obvious shape when selling crystals etc.
What about all the stuff made of crystals that was shaped into other things? Do you just ignore that?

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

19 Nov 2011 08:15Discussion #519Talk Sense

19 Nov 2011 09:13:56
is pudsey bear really blind in one eye?

19 Nov 2011 18:29

Sometimes

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

20 Nov 2011 16:37

He must be he gets DLA

Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

18 Nov 2011 22:29Discussion #518Talk Sense

18 Nov 2011 23:21:26
agreed with the guy who proposed the more meritocratic system. Another thing that needs sorting is the legal system. Was just watching spiral the french legal drama. And in france they have investigating magistrates independent of the executive. And i quote "its more fairer than the anglo saxon system where you need money to get the best lawyers"

Reply to this post

18 Nov 2011 20:49Discussion #517Talk Sense

18 Nov 2011 21:46:37
ed , do you personally think something big will happen in 2012 or do you think it ill just pass by, so to speak? if so what do think it will be or want it to be? thanks mate.
huddz red {Ed001's Note - I think it will be exactly the same as 2000, nothing will happen.}

18 Nov 2011 21:24

Sorry ed but what was suppose to happen in 2000?

Irish Red {Ed001's Note - depends on who you spoke to, but 7th Day Adventists, amongst others, believed it was going to be the end of the world.}

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

18 Nov 2011 21:24

Ok cheeers for the response mate, what bout you ed 033?
huddz red
{Ed033's Note - 2012 will probably be like 2011 but worse. More earth changes ie more floods, more violent weather. More natural disasters than 2011 i.e. more larger earthquakes. Even more economic problems than 2011 and a lot of hype from the media about 2012 being the end of the world but most of us will still be here in 2013. I really hope we don't allow WW3 to take place.}

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

19 Nov 2011 19:43

Isn't something supposed to happen with the magnetic field?

{Ed033's Note - The magnetic field is in the middle of changing, the completion of this current magnetic flip may not take place for up to another 200 years, although it may happen much sooner. It is unlikely the completion of the magnetic flip will take place in 2012.}

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

22 Nov 2011 14:06

Hi all, according to what you read into, it's pretty obvious the end of the world is not set for 2012. IF the Illuminati stuff is true, then expect some big global leader to be elected to rule from Israel for starters. Then between 2012 and 2023 expect massive changes in ruling in that area of the world (Zion). Apparently, 2012 is just the beginning. It isn't the day the world ends. The mayans didn't predict the end of the world is 2012, they just stopped their calenders then. Something significant will start but may be so subtle it goes unnoticed, and is something that is instead traced back to 2012 in years to come when people start wondering when 'it' started.

The whole 2000 thing was rubbish - it was some cyber geek's assumption that the new digital era would self-implode as it did not know how to handle to turning of the millennium. Many then cottoned onto this and ran with it and forecast world-wide economic collapse etc. Rather like the end scene of fight club where all the accounts go back to zero.

Then there are people who tried to make it seem significant for the sake of it and said things like the human race is going to nuke itself into extinction. Why would we have done that just because the date changed?!

Raz

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

18 Nov 2011 16:39Discussion #516Talk Sense

18 Nov 2011 17:37:53
Just something different what do yous think about the Paul is dead conapiracy its one I have always liked what yous think ..... rfc man

18 Nov 2011 18:08

Completely false in my opinion.

Firstly, finding a scouse, slightly lookey likey, singer songwriter, left handed bass player is some job description.

Some of the photo comparisons i've seen that show a difference in appearance in a very short period of time could easily be the result of being a music star and all the trappings that go with it.

Constant recording, touring, publicity exercises, partying and very frequent use of recreational drugs would have a noticable effect on anyone.

Some of those i can vouch for!

Paragon
{Ed033's Note - I don't think there is enough evidence that Paul did die and was replaced. Here is supposedly a comparison picture but doesn't prove anything - www.talkconspiracy.co.uk/ar_6.php

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

18 Nov 2011 19:44

I don't personally believe it myself its just one iv always liked if u play songs backwards u hear Msgs like pauls dead and the cover work with the clues on it and just some of the lyrics in there songs its always been one where i don't wish anyrhing bad to anyone but ud love it to be true ..... rfc man
{Ed033's Note - If you play any recording of spoken language backwards you will here something - reversespeech.com/home.htm

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

18 Nov 2011 19:53

LOL fair enough. Ed I guess I'm just a sucker for those ones like Paul Elvis and there is even a mj one kicking about
{Ed033's Note - There is a Lord Lucan conspiracy but that one is true.}

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

18 Nov 2011 20:02

I think it was just Lennon being a practical joker. He knew people would be on this for years.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

18 Nov 2011 21:38

Jim Morrisons death was all a bit mysterious , and he had a motive to
fake it, it seems more plausible than
the others to me.

JR

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 8 replies

Reply to this post

18 Nov 2011 12:22Discussion #515Talk Sense

18 Nov 2011 11:06:06
Why are we all surprised when our elected leaders turn out to be self serving, liein' two faced back stabbing Bas****ds? Surly to be capable of climbing the greasy pole that is politics in today's world they are exactly the skills you would need to rise to the top.
Call me naive but I was told in school that democracy was about being able to vote in a member of Parliament who would represent the collective views of his supporters. Now it seems that the orders come from the top down and not the bottom up, so to speak. As to who give our leaders their instructions is open to debate, as these pages are a testament. "The meek ain't gunna inherit she@" as a wise man once said.
I.V Lennin

18 Nov 2011 15:05

I actually thought that when we voiced our opinion about the political frailities in our country that the politicians were having a vote on a new system. Suilly me. It was turned around by the politians to a vote a system on how we voted instead of an abolition of the party political clap trap that we all have to endure and all the party political nonsense that drags our country down. I'm not usually so dim but heyho, we all have bad days. Chugs

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

18 Nov 2011 18:53

But how can you get rid of political parties? Sorry if i have misread that butt hats the impression i got when you meant the party political claptrap.

Also i assume that you mean the recent vote on that AV system. Well i for one voted against and am glad that it lost. It was desogned only to benefit the Lib Dems who knew they would pick up millions of 2nd votes and would have meant that they would have always had the power over whoever formed a govt. We would have had this coalition mess after every election. We would have ended up in as a bad a mess as Italy. 40 changes since 1946. Coalitions always provide weak govt. {Ed001's Note - parties do need to be abolished. Our MP is meant to represent the people of his/her constituency, but they are not doing that but instead representing their party. If ever they do decide to do the job they were elected to, whips come out and put a stop to it.}

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

18 Nov 2011 19:16

But then ed surely thats more the system that needs changing and not the parties. Abolish whips, install an electronic voting system that just counts the votes and not who voted so they have a degree of anonymity and can vote with their conscience or in line with what their constituents have said.

If you abolish the parties then you lose the choice of candidate. How would you choose candidates with no party system? How could you even form a govt with out parties? You;d just have 600 odd independents trying to form a govt, who would be in charge?

Or do you favour Parliament becoming just a legislative body more liek the American House of Representitives? But then you'd need a body similar to the Senate, and you'd have the same problems of electing it. Would you have power in the hands of an executive like the President, but how do you choose him? Just have anyone who cna afford it throw their name in at an elcetion time and have them battle it out on the issues, no party lines? Would you like to see someone like Blair in a fight against a Murdoch backed figure?

Sorry if i've waffled on but their are a lot of permutations. {Ed001's Note - I didn't say I had all the answers, but the current system is certainly not a good one and it needs to be upgraded and improved.}

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

18 Nov 2011 19:37

No Ed its not perfect but before changing it, change needs to be carefully considered lest we make things worse.

I'm not sure i could stomach President Blair and First Lady Cherie. God i've got chills thinking about it.

I think it needs to be in small steps. Getting rid of the whips and a more free voting system in Parliament would be a good first step.

{Ed033's Note - A good first step is to start moving towards mike montagne's mathematically perfected economy - www.perfecteconomy.com/wp/

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

18 Nov 2011 20:02

Yes Ed that would be a good step, but i wouldn't trust the current politicians or the current system to implement it. i think that the politics needs to be changed first in order to drive the economic and societal changes needed.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 7 replies

Reply to this post

18 Nov 2011 10:06Discussion #514Talk Sense

18 Nov 2011 11:05:08
viva la revolucion!

18 Nov 2011 12:22

Bourgeois parlimentarianism, the highest state of society.
(No way)
Third World debt, Third World exploitation.
(Damn)
What a society we're living in,
(You're right, I.V.)
Selling Third World drugs at First World prices!
They say Lenin was wrong. Who says?
(That's right)
It's enough to give me the f**king blues.

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

18 Nov 2011 10:05Discussion #513Talk Sense

18 Nov 2011 11:04:39
Why are we all surprised when our elected leaders turn out to be self serving, liein' two faced back stabbing Bas****ds? Surly to be capable of climbing the greasy pole that is politics in today's world they are exactly the skills you would need to rise to the top.
Call me naive but I was told in school that democracy was about being able to vote in a member of Parliament who would represent the collective views of his supporters. Now it seems that the orders come from the top down and not the bottom up, so to speak. As to who give our leaders their instructions is open to debate, as these pages are a testament. "The meek ain't gunna inherit she@" as a wise man once said.
I.V Lennin

Reply to this post

17 Nov 2011 23:07Discussion #512Talk Sense

17 Nov 2011 23:24:16
I cant believe that most people do not see what is happening right now, they are either really stupid, hypnotized or just dont give a f***! Although some people are waking up, its not enough. Its time that those of us who is awake did more (peacefully). I have children and i dont want them to be, at best an economic slave or at worst, well i dont dare to think.

{Ed033's Note - What is your solution?}

18 Nov 2011 09:35

I'm in no way advocating violence, but I truly feel that current power structure is constructed so that peacefull protest will prove ineffectual. The political infrastructure in the developed world can ignore protests because they do not impact change. This by design so that change can only come through violence; Therefore leading to a greater likelyhood that the majority of society will dismiss those calling for change as narrow minded hooligans. Also the powers that be know that idea of violence goes against everything those of us who really want change stand for. They have safeguarded themselves in a way that change can only be made through a sacrifice of one values and a continuation of the current cycle of harming others for ones own gain. I'm sure there is a way to impact change without such drastic measures but I stand inept to figure out what it is. However I do know that the tried and true means of the usual protests are inefectual and a new theory must be devised

Agree · 4 · Disagree · 0

18 Nov 2011 14:14

My solution is to get a internet campaign to forums like this to every nation around the world and for one day for every week NO ONE buys petrol, a big ask i know but it would be a small step in the right direction,you can even have a peacefull protest now like in new york or london,but if the word gets about striking once a week they cant make you buy petrol.
frankyscouse {Ed001's Note - those kind of protests don't work though mate, because the day after more petrol than ever is bought because people need it. If you want to protest about oil, stop using your car altogether.}

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

18 Nov 2011 16:02

Edd they dont work because we have never in history carried our actions out,so if it was a world wide strike and for instance they did raise the petrol prices the next day ,well then it would be two days of action against oil prices, pie in the sky you might think but its gonna take something like this that is peacefull or the other option a worldwide revolution ,i think most people would go the peacefull way.
frankyscouse {Ed001's Note - people will still need to buy petrol, it will do nothing until people start changing over to other means of transport.}

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

18 Nov 2011 18:53

Thats the problem with any kind of economic boycott, they've got you by the short and curlies, whatever you boycott you are going to need to go and buy it at some point, whether its a day, 2 days, a week or whatever.

The only thing we could do is all refuse to pay tax, like back in the poll tax riots. They couldn't imprison everyone after all. But there would still be a cost. Some people still thousands in unpaid tax don't they?

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

17 Nov 2011 17:35Discussion #511Talk Sense

17 Nov 2011 18:08:29
Re Ed001 saying Bush was guilty etc etc for
providing the means for warmongering...If
we take that to its logical conclusion then
every business which produces armaments
AND their employees are equally guilty. I am
not sure that you can manufacture guns/rockets/explosives etc which can only be
used for defence?
Puzzled {Ed001's Note - possibly you could say that, but there is a bit of a difference from being a lowly worker who needs to work to feed his/her family to being President of the most powerful nation on earth with the power to make decisions that affect us all.}

17 Nov 2011 17:58

Put it this way America gave Osama Bin Laden guns years ago because he was fighting people in his own country, and when Osama released a terrorist video the America government flew all of Bin ladens family out of America. All leaders are guilty of Warmongering in one way or another we just hear what the government wants us to hear

MJ

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0

17 Nov 2011 20:23

It is true that a 'lowly worker' is different in that he does not instigate the use of the arms he manufactures however without those arms the use thereof could not be instigated.

Also Ed001 I notice that your emphasis seems to be on Bush - no word on Clinton?

Puzzled {Ed001's Note - again, just as bad, if not worse because he tried to pretend to be better.}

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

17 Nov 2011 17:23Discussion #510Talk Sense

17 Nov 2011 17:35:10
Mort

A link to the Tesla coil www.altair.org/tesla.htm
also youtube has video's about how to build them although i want to one about the size of a car so it can power my house

MJ

{Ed033's Note - You can also attempt to build a John Bedini motor if you have basic electronic knowledge. Type Bedini into youtube - www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYtUL8OU7s4

17 Nov 2011 17:43

Cheers MJ. Mort.

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Reply to this post

17 Nov 2011 15:13Discussion #509Talk Sense

17 Nov 2011 15:57:21
ed i appreciate your point but honestly if i were to rank them then Bush would be grade two. Hitler and saddam would be grade one. Bush definitely warmongered for iraq. But i don't recall him gassing civilians. Or having police dragging people of the streets and disappearing. As far as we know anyway. I just think that you cannot compare anything to hitler. The only one that comes close is stalin. I know people don't like the yanks but they've just done the same as every other empire in history, fought a war for resources. Technology changes but the politics doesn't. Its just on a bigger scale today. But its not the same as actually ordering the total extermination of an entire people and culture based on dodgy racial theory. {Ed001's Note - but the point was that he is still a murderer and supplier of materiel needed to perpetuate atrocities. He also had the power to prevent numerous mass murders and killings but instead he not just sat idly by, but actually provided assistance to carry on the killings. So I am afraid he has to be ranked amongst the worst of the worst.}

17 Nov 2011 15:26

Stalin - calculated death toll approximately 29 million......from purges and planned famine 1928-1938 left 17.4 million death. Another 11 million non-battle deaths from 1940-49 and 500,000 in Gulag deaths (1950-53).

Hitler death toll plus-or-minus 11 million. These from the infamous death camps (concentration camps) to eliminate the Jewish population, as well as gypsies, homosexuals, political opposition, mentally defective (Hitler's term) and others deemed a challenge to Hitler's idea of a perfect Aryan society.

And, as a side, Mao Zedong exceeds Hitler or Stalin with 44-1/2 million to 72 million. These were rural and urban purges, the "Great Leap Forward", cultural revolution, labor camps and Tibetan massacres. {Ed001's Note - I notice you don't include the mass murder of the Kurds by both Hussein and the Turks, that seems to always get forgotten because the Turks are in NATO. There were a fair few million of those that have been wiped from the face of the earth.}

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

17 Nov 2011 17:21

Hi Ed that was a different guy I think backing my point up. I did refer to Saddam gassing civilains, didn't have any figures available at the time. Also i;d forgotten China, just because no-one ever mentions it, i hadn't even heard of those figures before.

Lets just say that there have been a lot of nasty little sh!ts in power. {Ed001's Note - it seems that the people that choose to get power are the wrong people.}

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

17 Nov 2011 17:23

Agree there have been lots of races (cleansed ) ,but i could include the disappearence of lots of races even the loss of millions of irish from the famine and millions of african nations , Im just puttin in the big hitters ed . cherrs .

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

17 Nov 2011 17:23

This is good all about the bush family/nazi links

www.robertreckmeyer.com/dark-forces-bush-family-conspiracy.html

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

17 Nov 2011 18:55

I kind of agree with both point of views,i see bush as bad as hitler ,stalin, hussein etc etc the only difference he wears a suit ,but bush is not the main player , he is getting told what to do,which is just as bad.
frankyscouse

Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 11 replies

Reply to this post

Talk Sense

Create a new post

Create New Post