Talk Sense

Share your thoughts. Join the discussion.

Text size
16px

Talk Sense

Message from the editors

Disclaimer: Please note that the content on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as anything else such as qualified professional advice. Anyone on this site seeking any advice should consult a qualified professional. This site's owner/creators cannot vouch for the veracity of the content on this site and are not liable for any risks or issues associated with using or acting upon the information on this site.

Discussion #11757Talk Sense

30 Oct 2021 12:29:09
Heart Stone Research -
Stellium7 questions the mainstream narrative with thorough research. Is it possible Titans once roamed this realm?

Watch on youtube only

{Ed033's Note - Thanks SM.
Southern Monkey
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11862Talk Sense

30 Oct 2021 08:41:15
Basic question for standard or anyone else for that matter. Let's go a little old school. Who killed JFK? Was it Lee Harvey Oswald? A loaded question I know. My thoughts on this have changed dramatically since having my eyes opened to the footage after the fatal shot.

 

{Ed033's Note - Thanks Supasub.
Supasub
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
southampton
30 Oct 2021 11:35:31
Lee Harvey Oswald did it.
I know this because BBC told me .
And no way could people do such a big conspiracy and cover it up .
Lol.
{Ed033's Note - Yes, that's their Standard response
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Rian
30 Oct 2021 12:51:09
Great answer Southampton. We all know he did it.

Here's a great documentary by Francis Conolly.

JFK TO 911 EVERYTHING IS A RICH MAN'S TRICK

url: bitchute.com/video/vsT4rOS03wXi/

Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Supasub
30 Oct 2021 14:51:18
What about Jackie? Her dress she wore that day has been locked away probably because of a potential ballistics report. I think it's been pushed back many more years again before anyone can get access to it. You would have thought she'd be more helpful?
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
southampton
30 Oct 2021 18:42:17
Yh I see what your refering to supasub.
If her dress has indeed been hidden away, Then yes it could possibly of been the driver.
But films been edited
And how would without investigation we know
Another report I heard it could have been the sewer, and a few different locations.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Liv4Life
30 Oct 2021 19:31:07
Question for everyone, how many people do you remember were in the car when jfk was shot?
{Ed033's Note - 6
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 11 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #2448Talk Sense

30 Oct 2021 04:32:55
One World Government and Population reduction from Malaysia's former Prime Minister in 2015.

 

{Ed033's Note - Thanks duccablue.
duccablue
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
duccablue
31 Oct 2021 01:53:59
Thanks Ed, sorry it's on FB watch, couldn't find the original source.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11756Talk Sense

29 Oct 2021 20:09:43
This is an older, very interesting documentary that, having watched years ago when I was a 24/ 7 carer and not having enough time to do real thinking/ research on, popped up on my YT feed again.

Trying to find anything about Luc Montagnier now you just get loads of sites disputing his belief that C.V. is BS. How ironic. Has anyone more information relating to these studies?

Water Memory (2014 Documentary about Nobel Prize laureate Luc Montagnier)






It could also tie in with the research Dr Masaru Emoto has performed with the emotional interactions with freezing water?

Dr Masaru Emoto's Water Experiments

 

{Mr Ed 33°'s Note - Thanks SM.

Another question for Standard or DavidMK would be; How did all the Water on Earth get here?
Southern Monkey
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Standard
29 Oct 2021 23:06:47
There was water already here and then we probably got some more from an asteroid would be my guess. Surely there isn't a 'water conspiracy' as well?
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Southern Monkey
30 Oct 2021 16:01:45
"There was water already here" This is a statement of fact with no proof. And then you go on to tell us it is your own 'guess' about more water from comets which is just more MS rhetoric.

Down the page you say we are 'taught at a very, very early age' certain things (indoctrinated) . Now Just suppose that was a lie? . Can't comprehend that? Then why choose this page to live in a box you are unable and unwilling to think beyond the edges of? . I don't believe you intend to troll, but is one of the main reasons, such as this, that people read you that way.

And no 'LOL'? would have been good having a super villain on here ;)
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #7014Talk Sense

29 Oct 2021 12:47:43
Ok, let's ask Standard about a more complex Physics based Moon issue.

Let's see how 'bright' you are Standard and see if you can come up with a 'brilliant' answer:

As you're a Physics Student, based on the Inverse Square Law of Light and the resolution of the Human Eye, how many Lumens does the Moon need to output based on its alleged size and distance from Earth for the average human (who is standing on Earth nearest to the Moon) to see it? (assuming the Standard response is that during a New Moon, the Moon 'reflects' zero Lumens and that's why we can't see a New Moon).

 

rank0 rank1 rank2 Ed033
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Standard
29 Oct 2021 14:38:20
Not sure what the question is but I think you're a little bit confused. Lumens is total quantity of visible light emitted from a source. The moon isn't a light source, it reflects light from the sun. So i'm not really sure what your asking.

Why can we see the moonlight even though it's 200000 km away or whatever it is? Because we're seeing the entire moon face reflect the light, not a small surface patch of the moon. Hope this clarifies, your question didn't really make much sense.
{Ed033's Note - Ok, this site is too advanced for you? You have to first realise and acknowledge that if i put any light source 1 inch from your eyes, and then move the light source away from your eyes, the further the light source is moved away, the dimmer the light. This is the Inverse Square Law of Light.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Tj70
29 Oct 2021 17:28:33
I could talk all day about light rays, the bending of, the reflection of, the refraction of etc (my degree and my career as an optician) but I'll just say one thing Standard. the irony is that the moon IS a light source.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
DavidMK
29 Oct 2021 18:22:28
You are being unfair to Standard Ed, what you are saying is not correct. It may seem preposterous that with the photon model of light that a large shell of emitted electrons would eventually get so thinned out after light-years of travel they would still be visible or detectable even. But brightness is what diminishes, not the photons themselves. If even a couple photons per second from that point in the sky make it to your eye, then it's visible. The more photons, the more brightness. It will never be zero. Out of 300 billion stars in the Milky Way only about 9,000 stars are close enough and bright enough to be visible to the naked eye. That is brighter than magnitude 6.5, the traditional criterion for naked-eye visibility.
In total their combined light isn't much. Their combined magnitude is almost exactly –5. The Sun is 487,530,000 times brighter than the 9000 visible stars in total which says that the light from these 9000 stars is 0.0000002 % of the total starlight hitting the Earth.
{Ed033's Note - Let's take this step by step. This isn't aimed at you specifically, but everyone:

Specifically, why don't we see the New Moon?
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
DavidMK
29 Oct 2021 21:07:56
The moon does not create light, it reflects sunlight. When the moon lies between the Earth and the Sun, it is only the back side of the moon that is lit by the Sun. In this situation the side of the moon facing the Earth is not able to reflect any light at all and appears dark.
{Ed033's Note - This is repeating the mainstream version, we try to use our own brains on here.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
DavidMK
29 Oct 2021 21:20:53
I have a question for Ed and the flat earthers. I don’t believe this theory but I also don’t believe everything I’m told and am prepared to listen to the other side of an argument and have watched all the videos posted here. However, the flat earth videos do contain a lot of contradictions and bad science. For example, many I have seen state the sun and moon are in fact only about 4 miles above us. Some of these same videos then also say that we have never visited the moon and can’t get out of near earth orbit.

Now I don’t believe in flat earth or the moon conspiracy, but if their assertions are true then

1) Standard air flights are at 5-7 miles up, so we would be flying above the sun and moon

2) Referring back to point 1, there would be no near earth orbit as our planes are already above the moon and so could presumably land on it :)
{Ed033's Note - If you had watched all the videos posted here, you would be aware that it's most likely that the Sun and Moon that we see are projections / reflections.

If the Earth is a Spinning/moving Globe, then we'd have to account for it, please come up with one thing on Earth where we have to account for curvature and one thing on Earth where we have to account for Earth's spin/movement?
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 14 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11799Talk Sense

28 Oct 2021 15:04:56
I know i said I would stop posting on here but just got sentimental from Rian thinking I'm a troll and haven't been on this page 8 years ago. Just found my old name and it's quite a laugh, I was far down the rabbit hole. Aron, was the sign off I used. I even once said I'd buy your book ed33, so let's see if we can repair our friendship a little bit lol.

 

{Ed033's Note - Ok Standard, watch this 5 minute video and explain how we definitely got to the Moon if Obama and the Actors pretending to be on the Space Station say we can't go beyond 'Low Earth Orbit'?

Never been beyond 'Low Earth Orbit' video.

Standard
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Rian
28 Oct 2021 18:48:59
Ha ha glad you're sticking around aran/ standard.

We don't all agree on the same stuff, but most people come here with a curious mind and a belief that the world is not as the msm would have us believe.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Southern Monkey
28 Oct 2021 20:28:07
You have a book, ed?

Standard. You are in the early stages of awakening otherwise you'd be gone from here long ago. It's a tough journey I am sure everyone on here will agree. Don't give up though.

Challenge everything you have been SKOOLED to believe. I mean, you like science? The act of a question being scrutinised and figured out. Well do just that. Question and think of ways to challenge all of that you are told to be truth. That is exactly what this page is about.

Once you realise most of the truth is all theories backed up by big money you will only get more questions. Again, what this site is for and there are a lot of people wanting to figure it all out.

BTW did you know we have a live chat Sunday at 5pm?
{Ed033's Note - No, here is the thread from 2015:

"02 Feb 2015 20:09:10
Mr ed 33 I must admit I often don't agree with a lot you have to say but I admire all the work you do and and always find it interesting non the less.
Anyway just wondering if you have plans to do a ed 33 book about your fav conspiracys and your views. I for one would purchase it as I do believe it would be a good read.
so get cracking and get a book done.

kind regards Mr negative

{Ed033's Note - i wouldn't expect anyone to agree with a lot i have to say for 2 reasons.
1. Even with the same information, people come to different conclusions.

2. Most people don't even take a look at any of the information out there, so how could they agree with me.

Yes, i have wanted to write a book or 2. It would be nice if a publisher could send me a 6 figure advance.

Deffo would buy your book as well edd, once I win the lottery I will send a healthy donation towards it.

{Ed033's Note - Thanks frankyscouser

I'll send you an advance on that book.


Oh wait, thought you said six finger advance

Mad dave

I'd read it to! You guys are much more smarter than me and I learn almost everything I know off the football pages and this page that I try to check out daily!

{Ed033's Note - thanks Aron"
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Southern Monkey
28 Oct 2021 21:04:01
Well, I apologise, Ed. I never knew we were amongst such establish stars. I thought Tesco got rid of you? do you still wear the horse sized glasses?
;)
{Mr Ed 33°'s Note - Yes i'm retired now and still like my daily dose of Chlorophyll.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Southern Monkey
28 Oct 2021 21:14:47
P. S. Standard, please don't have the booster. You're 21. Aren't we all? haha. Just do some more research and inner/ self thinking before you decide to have it. It doesn't stop anything to do with C.V., but what it can do, even in those seemingly unaffected, we just don't know.
Agree · 1 · Disagree · 0
Standard
29 Oct 2021 00:03:57
8 years later and I'd still buy your book ed, I'm always interested in Alternative views. Regarding the video, it's correct we can't currently do it. Context is missing, we can't currently do it cost effectively. We could build the same ship for an outrageous sum or we could develop the new technology at a much cheaper rate. So we cannot currently, not literally, but metaphorically. It wouldn't make sense. Back in the day it did make sense, to beat the Russians. The spacecraft we used all them years ago were extremely expensive and it's now destroyed as they cannot be used. Elon Musk has solved part of that problem through reusing the rocket ships.

Regarding evidence we've landed on the moon, I'm sure everything you've read about it you don't believe in. So I won't even go into the physics side, but have you ever thought about how much effort would go into faking it? The ship was built, and launched, people were at the launch so that definitely happened. The amount of time building the ship happened, as there's records. And communication between the ship and control happened, again, because records. Seems like a lot of effort and landing on the moon would just be easier. Way too much effort involved for faking it.

Unless you believe that all of that was faked aswell, and in that case. I literally have to evidence for you. I wasn't even alive when this happened and I didn't bring a go pro with me on the trip, so I cannot prove it If the current evidence can :D

The moon landing is one of my favourite conspiracies so thanks for the video!
{Mr Ed 33°'s Note - Thanks for the Standard response.
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0

Read all 18 replies

Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11755Talk Sense

28 Oct 2021 07:12:41
DEAL WITH THE DEVIL AKA Big pharma. (can not locate original source video)

url: bitchute.com/video/DoVl27m4hWy3/

 

{Ed033's Note - Thanks SM.
Southern Monkey
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11754Talk Sense

28 Oct 2021 07:07:02
Ever wondered what the MSBS news would be like if it was the truth? ;)

url: bitchute.com/video/tbPgwsCE3V3a/

 

{Ed033's Note - Thanks SM.
Southern Monkey
Agree · 0 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Discussion #11751Talk Sense

27 Oct 2021 17:31:27
UK RELEASING VACCINATED FELONS TO REPLACE THE UNVACCINATED TRUCKERS THEY JUST FIRED

url: bitchute.com/video/6dqWseejHz2W/

 

Southern Monkey
Agree · 2 · Disagree · 0
Reply to this post

Log in or register to reply.

Create a new post

Log in or register to post.

Create New Post

Create New Post

Please log in to create a new post.

Log inRegister

Posts appear after editor approval.